Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1969 Ford Torino Gt 6.4l on 2040-cars

Year:1969 Mileage:0 Color: Red /
 White
Location:

Commerce, Texas, United States

Commerce, Texas, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:GAS
Engine:6.4L 390Cu. In. V8 GAS Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:U/K
For Sale By:owner
VIN: 9r44f141907 Year: 1969
Make: Ford
Mileage: 0
Model: Torino
Exterior Color: Red
Trim: GT
Interior Color: White
Drive Type: U/K
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This is a 1969 grand torino gt it has no motor or transmission  or suspension and is on a body cart, this is a rust free car and has no body rot only minor surface rust on the inner firewall but no holes and perfect frame rails. I have these original items with car grille with headlights and bezels, taillights, bumpers, door panels window tracts all exterior trim, dash, all ac duct and vents, wipers and motor,all bolts, window cranks, door handles and misc interior trim, headliner, gauges, trunk hinges. The trunk is full of parts all labed by previous owner some parts are in ziplock baggies. The only body panel that needs replacement is the radiator support as someone cut it to take out the motor. This car is in great condition and would make a great restoration project as this car is very hard to find in this shape. If you are shipping this car you will need a forklift to load as there is no running gear under the car. happy bidding.

Auto Services in Texas

Z`s Auto & Muffler No 5 ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 16548 Stuebner Airline Rd, Jersey-Village
Phone: (281) 370-4500

Wright Touch Mobile Oil & Lube ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6011 Whitter Forest Dr, Jersey-Village
Phone: (832) 272-5376

Worwind Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 101 Bowser St, Scurry
Phone: (972) 563-3700

V T Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 243 Blue Bell Rd Bldg A, Atascocita
Phone: (281) 999-6444

Tyler Ford ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2626 S Southwest Loop 323, Winona
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Triple A Autosale ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 155 Maplewood St, Lumberton
Phone: (409) 246-8030

Auto blog

Bill Ford op-ed argues we can't just build and sell more of the same cars

Thu, 10 Jul 2014

It's hardly a secret that the auto industry is undergoing an enormous, tectonic shift in the way it thinks, builds cars and does business. Between alternative forms of energy, a renewed focus on low curb weights and aerodynamic bodies, the advent of driverless and autonomous cars and the need to reduce the our impact on the environment, it's very likely that the car that's built 10 years down the line will be scarcely recognizable when parked next to the car from 10 years ago.
Few people are as able to explain the industry's many upcoming changes and challenges as clearly as William Clay Ford, Jr., better known as Bill Ford. The 57-year-old currently sits as the executive chairman of the company his great-grandfather, Henry Ford, founded over 110 years ago.
In an op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Ford explains that the role of automakers is, necessarily, going to change to suit the needs of the future world. That means changing the view of not just the automobile, but the automaker. As Ford explains it, automakers will "move from being just car and truck manufacturers to become personal-mobility companies."

IIHS Crash-tests Expose American Muscle Cars' Weaknesses | Autoblog Minute

Thu, Jun 2 2016

Turns out American muscle cars aren?t that strong according to IIHS crash tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put three iconic American sports cars through a range of performance crash tests. Chevrolet Dodge Ford Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video crash test camaro challenger

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.