1967 Ford F100, V8, 4 Spd, 2wd on 2040-cars
Reno, Nevada, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:352 V8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Make: Ford
Model: F-100
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Trim: Pickup
Drive Type: Two Wheel
Mileage: 37,796
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
This is a 1967 Ford F100 pickup, 352 CI V8, 4 speed, two-wheel drive. Vin Tag:
F10YRA28961
115 M F100 N 81 FE 9
05000 172 4000 72
Odometer reading is 37795.9, odometer does not read in 100,000's so do not know actual mileage. Runs excellent. Bondo in passenger door per photo. Rust in typical places, per photos. Fuel tank/fuel system are clean. All glass is good, windows work. Overload springs. Dual exhaust. Optional flashers in glove box. Optional spare tire carrier. Aftermarket brake controller. Barden bumper. 3 seat belts. No power steering or power brakes. Slight exhaust leak at heat riser. Non-stock radio. Owner's manual included. I see no leakage. Battery not included. I do have video of the truck running and will be happy to send. Truck is sold as-is where-is. Clear Nevada title. I know no history on the truck. Will be happy to answer any questions I can.
Ford F-100 for Sale
- 1967 ford f100 turquoise, original california truck
- 1953 ford f-100 over-the-top 100+k build show truck w/the best of everything !
- 1965 ford f-100 pickup 352 mild cam flowmasters rebuilt c6 clean ready 4 paint
- 1955 ford f100 4x4
- 1960 ford f100 pickup truck(US $15,500.00)
- 1959 ford f-100 panel truck in ca running project(US $1,999.00)
Auto Services in Nevada
Updated Auto ★★★★★
Sudden Impact Auto Body and Collision Repair Specialists ★★★★★
Sudden Impact Auto Body & Collision Repair Specialists ★★★★★
Speed House ★★★★★
Smog-N-Go ★★★★★
Skip`s Spring Svc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford files trademark application for 'Model E'
Fri, 27 Dec 2013In early December, Ford filed an application with the US Patent and Trademark Office for the name "Model E." Historically, Ford never produced a Model E, and while automakers are known to file for trademarks they never use, some have wondered if the application might be used for a concept car.
Based on other recent events, though, it could be a legal move. In 2000 Ford sued an online start-up called Model E over the similarity of that name to Ford's industry-shaping Model T, but the judge dismissed the case citing lack of proper grounds. In August 2013, Tesla applied for trademark registration for Model E, and at the time, Ford said it would review the application. Tesla actually made two applications for Model E, one for automobiles and structural parts therefore, the other for "providing maintenance and repair services for automobiles," and there are plenty of theories about what the name could be applied to.
The Published for Opposition date for Tesla's applications is December 31, 2013, after which anyone who thinks they'd be harmed by Tesla being granted the trademark gets 30 days to register their issues. This is just speculation, but Ford's application - which was filed for automobiles only - might be about protecting what it sees as unwelcome encroachment on the name Model T, protection it wasn't able to enforce before when the stakes were only online and much smaller.
Detroit 3 and UAW set for showdown over tiered wages
Mon, Mar 23 2015This week, thousands of United Auto Workers will converge on Cobo Center in Detroit for the Special Convention on Collective Bargaining, an every-four-year event that lets members tell UAW leaders what the negotiating priorities should be during contract negotiations. This is where a lot of sand and a lot of lines start coming together in preparation for contract negotiations between the UAW and the Detroit 3 automakers, which will happen later this year. Number one on the UAW agenda is the end of the two-tier wage system created in 2007 to help the automakers get through bankruptcy; veteran workers are paid the Tier 1 rate of around $29.00 per hour, new hires are paid the Tier 2 rate of between $15 and $20 and get about half the benefits of Tier 1. Tier 2 hiring has been an undoubted success for the automakers, allowing them to keep factories in the US and hire more workers. By agreement, it is capped at a certain percentage of each automaker's workforce, and while the union's ultimate position is to get rid of the dual-scale system entirely; one leader said Ford could easily afford the $335 million it would take to convert all its workers to Tier 1 out of its $6.9 billion in 2014 North American profit, and General Motors could do the same out of the $5 billion it is handing to investors through the (admittedly forced) share buyback. Other delegates say that at the very least they'd be happy with enforcement of the current caps in the new contract. The automakers, conversely, would welcome expansion of the Tier 2 ranks. Including benefits, import automakers pay workers "in the high $40 range" per hour, according to an analyst, while Ford and GM pay about $59 in wages and benefits per hour. More Tier 2 workers on the rolls would let those two companies get labor cost parity with the competition. Fiat-Chrysler pays wages closer to the imports because of special exceptions in its UAW contract that allow unlimited Tier 2 hiring; those exceptions will end on September 14 and bring FCA into line with the other domestics, unless the new contract maintains them. FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne is opposed to the two-tier system, having called it "almost offensive." One analyst says the UAW might win a sizable pay raise for Tier 2 and a small increase for Tier 1, but the keystone issue will be how the hiring matrix can help the automakers keep overall wages in line with the imports.
2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid
Mon, 01 Apr 2013Your Mileage May Vary
As difficult as it is to write this, I was actually excited about the 2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid. With the beautiful looks of the newest midsize fighter from Ford and a fuel economy estimate capable of shaming even the stalwart Camry Hybrid, the battery-augmented four-door seemed like a recipe for unabashed success. But appearances love nothing more than swapping our boundless enthusiasm for cold platters of disappointment. The 2013 Fusion Hybrid gets hobbled right out of the gate with a lofty price tag, and real-world driving keeps the sedan from even approaching those EPA figures.
With so many excellent midsize hybrids on the market, is there any reason to consider the newest Fusion Hybrid? Are sharp aesthetics, a well-executed interior and capable driving dynamics enough to overcome the machine's shortfalls? Not from where I'm standing.