1971 Chevrolet K20 4x2 Completely Restored Beautiful Truck Show Quality on 2040-cars
Carson, Virginia, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:350
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Chevrolet
Model: C/K Pickup 2500
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Trim: CHEYENNE
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 2WD
Options: Leather Seats
Mileage: 84,261
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Sub Model: CHEYENNE
Exterior Color: ORANGE/WHITE
Interior Color: Black
Disability Equipped: No
Number of Cylinders: 8
Number of Doors: 2
UP FOR AUCTION IS MY 1971 CHEVY K20. IT HAS BEEN COMPLETELY RESTORED. I AM A SMALL USED CAR DEALER IN VA. MY DEALER NUMBER IN 25070. THIS IS MY PERSONAL TRUCK. I HAVE INVESTED OVER 50K IN THE RESTORATION OF THIS TRUCK AND I HAVE TO SELL DUE TO NEEDING THE STORAGE SPACE FOR SOMETHING ELSE.MY LOSS IS YOUR GAIN. I WILL ATTEMPT TO DESCRIBE THIS TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY. PLEASE CALL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. THE PICTURES DONT DO THIS TRUCK JUSTICE. IT HAS 100 MILES ON IT SINCE IT WAS FINISHED IT IN 2012.EVERY BOLT, NUT, BRACKET AND HOSE HAS BEEN REPLACED.THE MOTOR, TRANS AND REAR END HAS BEEN GONE THROUGH AND ARE IN GOOD CONDITION. EVERY SINGLE PIECE OF METAL ON THIS TRUCK HAS BEEN REPLACED EXCEPT THE CAB AND DOORS WHICH WERE IN PERFECT SHAPE. THE ENTIRE BED IS BRAND NEW. THERE IS WAY TOO MUCH TO LIST. THIS TRUCK HAS WORKING AIR CONDITIONING, POWER STEERING, POWER DISC FRONT BRAKES, BRAND NEW FRONT END, WHEELS, TIRES, BRAKES AND SHOCKS. THIS TRUCK IS AS TIGHT AND CLEAN AS A BRAND NEW TRUCK. CALL WITH ANY QUESTIONS, 804-720-7459. THANKS FOR LOOKING AND GOD BLESS, STEVE B.
Chevrolet C/K Pickup 2500 for Sale
Only 17k miles! beatuiful 2009 chevrolet silverado crew cab 2500 hd!
2000 chevrolet pick up truck 2500 ext cab 3 door(US $6,500.00)
1975 chevy 4x4 6.6l 400 v8 scottsdale k10 great running condition!
*** beautiful 1966 chevy c20 - one owner - rebuilt original 327 ***
1985 chevrolet crew cab truck(US $3,000.00)
1992 chevrolet k2500 silverado standard cab pickup 2-door 6.5l(US $5,000.00)
Auto Services in Virginia
Wrenches on Wheels ★★★★★
Virginia Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Transmissions of Stafford ★★★★★
Shorty`s Automotive Inc ★★★★★
Shell Rapid Lube ★★★★★
Salem Car Shop Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Bentley Continental GT V8 and Toyota 4Runner | Autoblog Podcast #604
Fri, Nov 15 2019In this week's Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski and Senior Editor, Green, John Beltz Snyder. First, they talk about driving the 2020 Bentley Continental GT V8 First Edition, followed by the 2020 Toyota 4Runner TRD Off-Road. Then they revive a format called "This or That," discussing the Jeep Wrangler vs. Gladiator, Subaru Forester vs. Outback, Mustang vs. Camaro vs. Challenger, and whether they'd rather spend $25,000 on a new or vintage car. They've got an update on a previous Spend My Money segment, and, finally, they help another listener pick a daily driver. Autoblog Podcast #604 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown 2020 Bentley Continental GT V8 2020 Toyota 4Runner This or That: Jeep Gladiator or Jeep Wrangler Subaru Forester or Subaru Outback Ford Mustang, Chevy Camaro or Dodge Challenger Vintage car or new car Spend My Money Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video: Podcasts Bentley Chevrolet Dodge Jeep Subaru Toyota Truck Coupe SUV Luxury Off-Road Vehicles Performance Classics
Pony-car sales war: Mustang vs. Camaro vs. Challenger [UPDATE]
Fri, Jul 3 2015Update: An earlier version of this story misstated the 2015 Mustang's weight when compared with previous models. Additionally, we have added comments from Chevrolet in the text. The Ford Mustang has blown past the Chevy Camaro as America's best-selling pony car, and in June, it wasn't even close. The 'Stang outsold the Camaro 11,719 to 8,611 cars. The Camaro remained ahead of the Dodge Challenger, which sold 6,845 units. Even though the Camaro did post an 11.5-percent sales improvement in June, the competition is arguably stronger than at anytime since the 1970s muscle-car era. The Mustang's sales leapt a whopping 53.6 percent, while the Challenger saw a gain of 56 percent. Several factors are weighing down Camaro sales, including its lame duck status. Chevy is launching a new generation of the Camaro this year that's more than 200 pounds lighter, offers a new turbo four-cylinder engine option, and has a nicer interior than the outgoing model. Put simply: wait a few months and you can get a better car. It's also unlikely Chevy will jack up the price much, as it's historically kept the Camaro within reach of everyday enthusiasts. While Chevy fans wait in anticipation for their new sports car, Ford and Dodge have downshifted. The new Mustang, which went on sale last year, is faster and more sophisticated than its predecessor. It also offers a 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder, which Ford has credited for the Mustang's recent uptick and makes up 36 percent of the car's sales, Ford analyst Erich Merkle said. View 17 Photos June's performance allowed the Mustang to widen its sales gap with the Camaro this year. Through the first five months, Ford sold 68,290 Mustangs, a 54.4-percent increased compared with 2014. Chevy sold 42,593 Camaros, an 8.7-percent decrease. The Challenger – long the No. 3 pony car in sales volume – has seen its sales surge 41 percent this year to 37,011 units. Spokesman Monte Doran said Chevy expected that 2015 would be a "relatively soft year" for the Camaro. "Mustang is taking advantage of years' worth of pent-up demand for an independent rear suspension," he said. "When Camaro introduced an IRS, in 2009, it helped make us the best-selling performance car in America.
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.