2001 Volvo S80 T6 Executive Edition. 2.8l I6 Twin Turbo. Automatic. 127k. on 2040-cars
Patterson, New York, United States
2001 Volvo S80 T6 Executive Edition for sale. Clean title. Automatic transmission with available tiptronic manual sport shifting. 127k miles. This is the top of the line model with every option. FULLY LOADED. Drives very well and comfortably, it's like riding on a cloud!. It gets above average gas mileage surprisingly(being such a large and powerful car). This is a high performance 2.8L I6 Twin Turbo 268hp engine and it requires premium fuel only! Very roomy and comfortable 4 door sedan with heated, power adjusted leather seats. The perfect combination of luxury and sport from Swedish engineers. Black exterior paint which is glossy and in decent shape. The car is not brand new so it would be unrealistic to expect mint condition. It has minor scratches and dings nothing terribly obvious. Interior I would rate at a 8/10. The car was purchased as a spare until we could shop around and buy a new car. We just bought that brand new car so now we need to make some room. The KBB value is estimated at $2,971 - $5,449, and similar cars are selling for between $4000 and $5000+.
Black Exterior with Tan Leather Interior Transmission: 4-Speed Automatic Overdrive with Tiptronic Standard Engine 2.8L 268 hp I6 Horsepower 268 @ 5400 RPM Torque (lb-ft) 280 @ 1800 RPM City (mpg) 18 Highway (mpg) 26 Sunroof Air Conditioning Power Windows Power Door Locks Leather Seats Heated Seats Driver Multi-Adjustable Power Seat Power Seats Cassette Player CD Player Driver and Passenger Side Airbags ABS Brakes Traction Control Tilt Steering Daytime Running Lights (insurance saver $$$) The car does have some minor issues but is completely driveable and ready to go. It does leak some oil. Haven't had time to look to see exactly where it's coming from, but it could be something as simple as an oil pan gasket, I'm not sure. As long as the oil is full, there's no worries. Lastly, the exhaust emits some smoke, probably due to the oil leak, the excess is being burnt off. Feel free to msg and come take a look, I've been as honest as I could and I'll answer any questions you may have. Don't wait for your chance at an affordable luxury car! This car won't last at this price!! $200 deposit due within 2 days of auction end, remaining balance within 7 days. Please do not bid if you do no have funds available!! Thanks for Looking! |
Volvo S80 for Sale
2013 volvo 3.2l(US $26,900.00)
2010 volvo s80 3.2 used 3.2l i6 24v automatic fwd sedan premium(US $9,999.99)
2006 volvo **amazing condition**(US $6,995.00)
11 s80 3.2l s60 s40(US $15,942.00)
2008 volvo s80 v8 sedan 4-door 4.4l(US $7,995.00)
2002 volvo s80 2.9l
Auto Services in New York
Zuniga Upholstery ★★★★★
Westbury Nissan ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Value Auto Sales Inc ★★★★★
TM & T Tire ★★★★★
Auto blog
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Volvo S60 Polestar concept plays in the snow with Mercedes C63 AMG
Thu, 24 Jan 2013Chris Harris took to a snowy stretch of tarmac to get a fingertips-on-the-wheel feel of the Volvo S60 Polestar concept. Harris says the turbocharged sedan with 508 horsepower and 424 pound-feet of torque - and a manual transmission - is "a study to see if Volvo can get back into the fast-car market." The Polestar S60 concept, one of which was already purchased for $300,000 by a private buyer, is still making the publicity rounds because even Volvo's Chinese owners realize that, as Harris says, "Volvo sold more cars because it made fast cars" like the old 850 T5 Wagon that stormed the British Touring Car Championship in the 1990s.
For reference, Harris compares the blue wonder to the Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG and its 487 hp and 442 lb-ft. The question is, were Volvo to get the price of a production version of the S60 Polestar to climb way down from its 200,000-pound sticker, could it be worthy competition to the established giants?
You can watch Harris divine the answer via a lot of drifting through the snow and a drag race in the video below.
California adapts ZEV mandate with PHEVs for smaller automakers
Fri, Jun 5 2015California is the nation's largest market for zero-emissions vehicles with over 100,000 of them estimated to be on the roads there. The state's goal is to keep that number growing every year. To that end, the California Air Resources Board is now tweaking its rules in a way that might not boost ZEVs but could mean more plug-in hybrids for the Golden State. Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Subaru, and Volvo asked for an exemption to the state's zero-emissions vehicle mandate last year due to their relatively small development budgets compared to larger automakers. CARB denied their request but did craft a compromise, according to Automotive News. Rather than being required to offer a ZEV in the state, companies with an annual global revenue of less than $40 billion, like those in this group, may instead sell plug-in hybrids to earn ZEV credits. The companies aren't completely off the hook, though. If these plug-in hybrids don't earn enough credits, the corporations must buy them on the market to make up the difference. Automakers with popular electric models like Nissan and Tesla have made a big business through this trading system by selling their surplus to rivals. Tesla alone pocketed $51 million in the first quarter from this part of its business, according to Automotive News. The changes to the regulations also aren't set in stone, yet. CARB is meeting in 2016 and could adjust things further at that time. Related Video: News Source: Automotive News - sub. req. via Hybrid CarsImage Credit: Justin Sullivan / Getty Images Government/Legal Green Jaguar Land Rover Mazda Mitsubishi Subaru Volvo Emissions Electric Hybrid California zev credits zero emissions vehicle