Beautiful 2008 Volvo S40 - 47k Miles - $5.8k Below Market Value - No Reserve! on 2040-cars
North East, Maryland, United States
2008 Volvo S40 only 47k miles in excellent condition. 2.4L sedan.
Beautiful Silver Paint, mechanically perfect, tires 70% front, 50% rear Cruise, Sirius Satellite Radio, Premium Sound System, Keyless entry, Front wheel drive (incredible in snow), Power Windows, Dual Air Bags, Side Air Bags, Head Curtain Air Bags, Power Door Locks, Traction Control, Stability Control , ABS (4-Wheel), Power Moon Roof, Alloy Wheels, Spare has never seen the road, tinted windows, Power Drivers Seat, AC & Heat Perfect, Fog Lights, 6 cd changer, Oil and Filter just changed - car is nearly flawless. Car only shows 42k on the odometer and engine has 47k miles so we've listed it at 47k miles. Engine recently replaced because previous owner drove car across flooded road and engine injested water and was damaged. Volvo wanted $10k to replace engine so insurance company bought car and resold it at auction where I bought it and had engine replaced I've driven it for last 1,500 miles but have decided it's too nice of a car to drive in my 120 mile daily commute, so I'm selling it. My loss is your gain. This is NOT a flood car - water never entered interior of car. Vin is: YV1MS390882367867 and Erie Insurance Company - Bethlehem, Pa. will verify this. Local Elkton ASA Certified Master Mechanic with 35 years experience replaced engine with a 47,000 mile engine from a 2007 S40. (Delancy Auto Repair) I've driven the car nearly 1,500 miles since the engine was replaced and it perfect - I MEAN PERFECT! Car runs and handles perfectly - no issues whatsoever - car is priced $5,800 below book value. MD Remanufactured title - no liens Car is priced $5,800 below Clean Retail Value. Test drives and inspection welcomed - you will be impressed and you won't find another S40 this nice with such low miles for the money - I know it. |
Volvo S40 for Sale
2001 volvo s40, no reserve
2001 volvo s40 1.9 turbo all options. 2 owners. 0 accidents. no reserve!!!
2004 volvo s40 timing belt done. new tires. 2 owners. 0 accidents. no reserve!!!
2000 volvo s40 as 4dr sdn w/sunroof
2000 volvo s40 1. white sedan
2009 volvo s40 2.4 .silver/grey leather,all power,sunroof 49k 1 owner mint
Auto Services in Maryland
Why Pay More Automotive ★★★★★
Wes Greenway`s Waldorf VW ★★★★★
United Transmissions ★★★★★
S.A.P. Automotive Center Inc. ★★★★★
Robey`s Service Center ★★★★★
Roberts Custom Exhaust ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford, Volvo, Google, Uber and Lyft form self-driving alliance
Tue, Apr 26 2016Five companies arguably leading the worldwide effort to develop autonomous cars said Tuesday they're forming an organization to lobby the federal government to better prepare America's roads for self-driving technology. The founding members include some of the biggest companies in the automotive, autonomous, and ride-sharing realms – Ford, Google, Lyft, Uber and Volvo. Operating as the "Self-Driving Coalition for Safer Streets," they aim to work with lawmakers and regulators to clarify a disparate set of rules and regulations at both the state and federal levels that could hinder the deployment of autonomous cars. "The U.S. risks losing its leading position due to the lack of federal guidelines for the testing and certification of autonomous vehicles." – Hakan Samuelsson David Strickland, a former administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration who issued the first set of autonomous-related policies in that role (pictured below), will serve as the group's counsel and spokesperson. "The best path for this innovation is to have one clear set of federal standards, and the Coalition will work with policymakers to find the right solutions that will facilitate the deployment of self-driving vehicles," he said in a written statement. In January, Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said his department would accelerate efforts to craft such federal standards. Those efforts include holding two public hearings on standards, the second of which is scheduled to be held Wednesday in Palo Alto, California. Foxx signaled the intent to deliver them by June. Google has been leading the efforts to ensure such standards are national in scope, warning their cars could run afoul of state-specific laws should they cross state borders or if standards varies between the federal efforts and regional ones. The complexity of such efforts was underscored recently, when NHTSA agreed that Google's software could be considered the driver of a vehicle for the purpose of meeting federal motor vehicle standards, an interpretation that would conflict with preliminary California rules that mandate a licensed driver operate a self-driving car that comes equipped with human controls like a steering wheel and brakes. At South By Southwest last month, Jennifer Haroon, Google's self-driving car business leader, said the company couldn't accomplish its goals under those regulations.
Volvo shows glimpses of new Concept C Coupe ahead of Frankfurt [w/video]
Mon, 26 Aug 2013Volvo has released a short teaser video for a concept car that will be unveiled on August 29 ahead of the Frankfurt Motor Show. At first glance, it would appear to be nothing more than a few sketches and some words from Volvo design boss Thomas Ingenlath, but at about the 11-second mark, four images are flashed on the screen revealing the true nature of the video - the Volvo Concept C Coupe.
As Inglenlath suggests in the video, this new concept is designed to help bring more excitement to the brand's lineup, and from what we can tell in these strategically captured shots, the company is definitely on to something. While we don't get too much of look from any one angle, the front reveals what appears to be a concave version of Volvo's signature grille and the side shows off a stylish greenhouse. We have to wonder, do these images confirm the identity of the mystery concept car that's been floating around the Internet this week? In either case, our favorite view is perhaps the rear shot giving us a glimpse of the car's name as well as its flat, wide haunches and C-shaped taillights.
Scroll down to watch the whole video, and if you don't have a trigger-quick mouse finger, don't worry. We made a gallery of screen shots showing the four embedded images.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.