'73 Vw Fastback, 2nd Owner, Very Original Like New, 52k Orig Mi, No Reserve on 2040-cars
Santa Maria, California, United States
1973 VW Fastback with Full Auto Transmission / Less than 54,000 Orig. Miles / Nearly all Stock & Original / Accident & Rust-Free California Car / 2nd Owner / Professionally Maintained This ’73 VW Fastback is in incredible condition, nearly all stock and original. Originally purchased from the VW dealer in Santa Maria, California, the first owner took excellent care of the car clocking just over 51,000 miles until 2006 when the car was put in storage. When she died in 2013 it was purchased from her estate by the same VW-trained master mechanic who had maintained it at his shop since 1975. Since buying it the mechanic has driven it about 200 miles. After 47 years in the business, the mechanic is retiring and selling off his inventory. After buying the car, the mechanic did the following maintenance work: New batteryAll new fuel hoses New Bosch fuel pump 4 new tires Replaced all fluids New brakes, front & rear Full engine tune-up New gas shocks This car is accident-free and has always been garaged. It starts, runs and drives like new. The fuel-injected engine is all stock and idles smoothly. The fully automatic transmission works perfectly. The paint, upholstery, glass, door cards, carpet, headliner and trunk liners are all original and in like new condition. The car has never been smoked in. There is no rust anywhere. The pan is solid all around. Gauges and lights work as they should except for the clock which stopped working at 9:22. There is a small dash crack by the speaker grill. It comes with the original blue California license plates, the original dealer license plate frames, original jack and tool kit, and the original owner’s manual . This car needs nothing but a new owner. The car is located in Santa Maria, CA where it’s been all it life, and can be viewed there by prior arrangement with the seller. The title is clear but the DMV registration is not current and back fees may be due. It’s smog-exempt in California. This car is in excellent condition. I’ve attempted to give a complete and accurate description but it’s possible I’ve overlooked something. So please ask any questions you may have. However, please note that this car will be sold as is, with no warranty against unknown conditions or conditions that may develop after the sale. This car is being offered with no reserve and will go to the highest bidder upon full payment. A deposit of 10% of the sale amount is due within 24 hours of close of auction and can be made via paypal or cash. Balance is due within 7 days of close of auction and must be made in cash or by certified bank check. If paying by bank check, the car won’t be released until the check has cleared the bank. Buyer is responsible for all pick up or shipping arrangements and costs. The seller is willing to store the car for a reasonable amount of time to allow the buyer to arrange pickup or shipping. Buyer must contact the seller to make storage arrangements as needed. Thanks for watching and happy bidding. |
Volkswagen Type III for Sale
1965 volkswagen squareback custom streetrod chopped hot rod
1963, vw, type 3, notchback, push button, super rare, runs & drives, clean title
1970 volkswagen vw type iii fastback automatic(US $4,500.00)
Vintage vw 1970 volkswagen type 3 fastback project w/title
1965 volkswagen type iii
Volkswagen type111 3 fastback = rare east coast fla, project, roller, aircooled
Auto Services in California
Zoll Inc ★★★★★
Zeller`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Your Choice Car ★★★★★
Young`s Automotive ★★★★★
Xact Window Tinting ★★★★★
Whitaker Brake & Chassis Specialists ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test
Wed, Sep 29 2021The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:
Scott Pruitt unfiltered: EPA administrator talks climate science, car emissions
Tue, Jul 18 2017U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt gave Reuters a wide-ranging interview on Monday at his office in Washington, discussing issues from climate science to automobile emissions. The following is a full transcript of the interview: REUTERS: You have said the EPA will focus on a "Back to Basics" approach under your leadership. What does this mean for how EPA enforces polluters? You have been critical of the idea of regulation by enforcement. PRUITT: I think what I'm speaking about, there is a consent decree approach to enforcement, where you use judicial proceedings to actually engage in regulation. Enforcement should be about existing regulations that you're actually enforcing against someone who may be violating that, very much in the prosecutorial manner. As attorney general [in Oklahoma], I lived that. There was a grand jury that I led. Being a prosecutor, I understand very much the importance of prioritization, of enforcing the rule of law, of addressing bad actors. That's something we are going to do in a meaningful way across the broad spectrum of cases, whether it is in the office of air or the Superfund area, or otherwise. REUTERS: Do you want to see states play a bigger role in enforcing polluters, even though some have less of a capacity to do so – financially and personnel wise? PRUITT: I think the state's role is really, when you look at this office working with states, it should be how do we assist, how do we engage in compliance and assistance with states. The office [at EPA that deals with enforcement] is called OECA, the Office of Enforcement, Compliance and Assistance, so those are the tools we have in the toolbox to achieve better outcomes. So what we ought to be doing is working proactively with state DEQs [Departments of Environmental Quality] to get their state implementation plans [for federal regulations] timely submitted, provide assistance and technical support, drive a draft of state implementation plans, and then actually work with them on how to achieve through those plans better outcomes and air and water quality. As far as enforcement is concerned, we will actually work with states. We actually did that recently with Colorado. There was an oil and gas company that was emitting some 3,000 tons, is that what it was, it was quite a bit of ... it was an ozone case. In any event, we joined with Colorado in that prosecution. So sometimes states will do it, sometimes we will join with them.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #366 LIVE!
Mon, 27 Jan 2014We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #366 tonight, and you can check out the topics below, drop us your questions and comments via our Q&A module, and don't forget to subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so. To take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #366
2015 Lincoln Navigator