2011 Volkswagen Jetta Se Sedan 4-door 2.5 33mpg Factory Warranty 1 Owner/0 Accid on 2040-cars
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.5L 2480CC 151Cu. In. l5 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Volkswagen
Model: Jetta
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Trim: SE Sedan 4-Door
Options: mp3, blue tooth, satellite radio, Leather Seats, CD Player
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: stability control, FWD, Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 35,477
Power Options: keyless remote, Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 5
Volkswagen Jetta for Sale
- Diesel,leather,panoramic roof,alloy wheels, clean carfax,one owner,books / keys
- 2012 volkswagen jetta se 2.5 ,leatherette , automatic ! only 3,400 miles!(US $13,995.00)
- 2012 volkswagen jetta 2.5 se 17" vw anthracite goal alloy wheels rear spoiler(US $15,900.00)
- 2006 vw jetta 4 drs sedan diesel tdi 5spd manual transmission ///////(US $8,900.00)
- 06 jetta tdi diesel 45mpg leather sunroof certified warranty we finance(US $9,490.00)
- 2011 vw jetta tdi diesel , sunroof, navigation, keyless entry, heated seats43mpg(US $23,900.00)
Auto Services in Alabama
Wycoff Motors ★★★★★
Tweet Shop ★★★★★
Triple G Mufflers & Auto Repair ★★★★★
Town & Country Ford ★★★★★
Springville Road Auto & Tire ★★★★★
Rex`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Italian investigators search Lambo headquarters in VW probe
Thu, Oct 15 2015Italian investigators searched Lamborghini headquarters on Oct. 15 to look for evidence of managers' involvement in Volkswagen's emissions cheating. VW's main office in Verona was also inspected, according to Reuters. Lamborghini is owned by Volkswagen, and Lambo in turn is listed as the owner of VW Group Italia. Authorities wanted to find out if employees were conscious that the vehicles were skirting emissions rules. "It is one thing if I sell water and pretend it's wine, but if I sell water believing it is wine it's different." Verona chief prosecutor Mario Giulio Schinaia said to Reuters. Italian newspaper Gazetta del Sud reported that several managers in Italy were under investigation for alleged fraud. Prosecutors in Germany have also been rigorously investigating VW, and they recently staged a similar raid on the company's headquarters in Wolfsburg, Germany. The automaker reportedly turned over documents and other data relating to the software defeat device. Meanwhile, VW's internal investigation has turned up little wrongdoing, though a recent leak suggested otherwise, and at least 30 managers could have known about the defeat device. The automaker has disputed that figure. Volkswagen of America CEO Michael Horn testified before Congress that he believed only a few individuals were involved. The situation hasn't been easy on VW in the US, either. The Department of Justice has also been pursuing an investigation into the automaker. Plus, state attorneys general are filing lawsuits against the company for defrauding customers. VW has until Nov. 20 to explain a repair for the problem to the California Air Resources Board. Related Video:
VW joins Daimler's protest of new A/C refrigerant as EU deadline for compliance passes
Sun, 06 Jan 2013The case of Dupont and Honeywell's refrigerant R-1234yf is doing the exact opposite of keeping things cool. The two chemical companies have spent years and hundreds of millions of dollars developing R-1234yf to replace R-134a, the new refrigerant shown to be 99.7-percent kinder to the environment than the one it is meant to succeed. Part of that development has been years of testing by governments, outside safety agencies and automakers to approve the chemical for use in cars. It passed the protocols necessary for the European Union to declare that new and significantly revised cars from 2013 onward needed to use R-1234yf, and mandated that every car as of 2017 must use it.
Enter Daimler AG. The automaker created a head-on collision test with a B-Class at their Sindelfingen test track that would lead to the pressurized refrigerant being sprayed on the engine. The result in 20 out of 20 test was that the refrigerant burst into flames as soon as it hit the hot engine, while Daimler says that R-134a does not catch fire in the same test. Another unexpected result of the R-1234yf test was the release of hydrogen flouride, a chemical far more deadly to humans than hydrogen cyanide, emitted in such amounts that it that turned the windshield white as it began to eat into the glass.
Said a Daimler engineer in a Reuters piece, "It was scarcely believable. The most complicated lab tests conducted using the most sensitive measuring instruments around found nothing and all we do is drive a car around a couple of times, open a tiny hole in the refrigerant line and the next thing you know the car is on fire." So Daimler said it wouldn't use the refrigerant, and it recalled the cars it had already shipped with R-1234yf.
Porsche again staring down another $1.8B in hedge fund lawsuits
Wed, 15 May 2013The sequence of events from 2007 that began with Porsche's secret attempt to take over Volkswagen, and instead lead to Porsche being taken over by VW, continues to instigate lawsuits against the Stuttgart sports car manufacturer. A group of hedge funds that suffered over $1 billion in losses sued the car company in New York. Porsche had publicly stated it wasn't trying to buy VW, the hedge funds in question were shorting VW stock, and when Porsche's actual intentions were revealed, the stock shot up and the hedge funds took a beating.
The case was thrown out over the issue of jurisdiction, then appealed, only to see another suit filed on top of that. After that, most of the hedge funds withdrew their claims in New York and Porsche offered a 90-day window to refile in Germany where it is already fighting a number of other suits over the same issue. The hedge funds accepted the offer, refiling in Stuttgart for $1.8 billion in damages. According to Bloomberg, Porsche hasn't commented on the refiling, but as the same plaintiffs are involved, it's safe to assume that the carmaker still feels the case is "unsubstantiated and without merit." It has fared alright so far even in German courts, with two lesser cases against it thrown out last year.