Base Manual Truck 2.7l Manual on 2040-cars
Dillsburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Engine:2.7L 2694CC l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Extended Cab Pickup
Fuel Type:GAS
Interior Color: Gray
Make: Toyota
Model: Tacoma
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Trim: DLX Extended Cab Pickup 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4WD
Mileage: 142,054
Sub Model: Base
Number of Cylinders: 4
Exterior Color: Green
Toyota Tacoma for Sale
- 4x4 certified 2.7l 159 hp automatic a/c rear sliding window front skid plate
- Trd sport v6 certified 6-speed manual 4.0l 236 hp 4x4 full power / loaded sharp!
- Prerunner sr5 v6 only 11k miles super clean must see!(US $27,896.00)
- 2006 toyota tacoma pre runner 2wd crew cab pickup 4-door 4.0l long travel truck(US $22,900.00)
- 02 toyota tacoma sr5 4wd 4cyl 5speed towhitch toolbox noaccidents cleancarfax!!(US $10,489.00)
- 2008 toyota tacoma prerunner double cab sport 63k miles navigation new tires(US $15,990.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
West Penn Collision ★★★★★
Wallace Towing & Repair ★★★★★
Truck Accessories by TruckAmmo ★★★★★
Town Service Center ★★★★★
Tom`s Automotive Repair ★★★★★
Stottsville Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
Lexus eschews production in China over quality concerns
Sat, 03 May 2014One of the more popular trends in the auto industry is setting up production operations in China. Mainstream manufacturers like Ford, General Motors and Volkswagen have done it, and even luxury marques like Audi, BMW and Mercedes-Benz have or will soon have manufacturing ops in the People's Republic.
One company that isn't building cars in China, though, is Lexus. The Toyota-owned luxury brand still manufactures all of its vehicles in Japan (aside from a few RXs, which are built at a Toyota factory in Canada). According to Tokuo Fukuichi, Lexus just isn't ready to build cars there yet.
"The German Three have a brand image that they have cultivated over the past century in their long history, but Lexus is not in people's minds like that yet," Fukuichi-san told Reuters UK.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
Judge halts Toyota unintended acceleration cases, triggers time for settlement negotiations
Mon, 16 Dec 2013So far, the lawsuits brought forth against Toyota for unintended acceleration have gone both ways: the automaker was found not at fault in a 2009 California crash and liable for a 2007 crash in Oklahoma. Both cases involved a Camry and resulted in fatalities. With a big chunk of these UA cases (around 200) set to his the docket of US District Judge James V. Selna in Santa Ana, California, Bloomberg is reporting that the judge has halted the lawsuits until March after Toyota and its lawyers have had extra time to try and settle the cases.
According to the article, Toyota is looking to take care of the cases out of court with an "intensive settlement process." Having already paid out $1.6 billion in "economic loss" suits, this latest settlement process is aimed at the wrongful death and personal injury cases allegedly associated with unintended acceleration. A hearing for the settlements will be held on January 14 with conferences on the matter commencing in February. There is no word as to when lawsuits may start back up if settlements can't be agreed upon.