2013 Toyota Rav4 Le on 2040-cars
411 S Metro Pkwy, Rogers, Arkansas, United States
Engine:Gas I4 2.5L/152
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 2T3ZFREV7DW039345
Stock Num: R158060A
Make: Toyota
Model: RAV4 LE
Year: 2013
Exterior Color: Barcelona Red Metallic
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 10736
Looks Fantastic! OIL CHANGED! Carfax One Owner! 31 MPG! Low miles with only 10,736 miles! This near new Toyota RAV4 LE has a great looking Red exterior! Our pricing is very competitive and our vehicles sell quickly. Please call us to confirm availability and to setup a time to drive this RAV4! We are located at: 411 South Metro Parkway, Rogers, AR 72758. Arkansas's Largest selection of used and Certified Toyota vehicles. Come see for yourself how Toyota of Northwest Arkansas's honest and upfront approach will change the way you buy a New Toyota.
Toyota RAV4 for Sale
2011 toyota rav4 limited(US $24,988.00)
2012 toyota rav4(US $21,995.00)
2014 toyota rav4 limited(US $29,680.00)
2005 toyota rav4 base(US $9,995.00)
2008 toyota rav4 base(US $12,995.00)
2006 toyota rav4 base(US $12,990.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Spittler Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Robert Sangster Garage ★★★★★
Precision Tune Auto Care ★★★★★
Prairie Grove Tire & Lube ★★★★★
Napa Auto Parts - Collier Auto Supply Inc ★★★★★
M & M Tire-Auto/Goodyear Tire ★★★★★
Auto blog
Auto News Recap for 9.9.16 | Autoblog Minute
Sat, Sep 10 2016A recap of the week in automotive news, including Honda Civic Type R spy shots, Toyota Supra spy shots, and a teaser of the Lexus UX crossover concept. Honda Lexus Toyota Crossover Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video honda civic type r supra hot hatch lexus ux concept
Scion rules out roadster, turbo versions of FR-S
Tue, Nov 25 2014Ever since Toyota and Subaru released the sports car alternatively known as the GT86, 86, BRZ and Scion FR-S a couple of years ago, rumors have circulated that even more exciting variants could be in store. But at least as far as Scion is concerned, those rumors are apparently nothing more than wishful thinking. Speaking with WardsAuto at the LA Auto Show last week, Scion chief Doug Murtha said that the prospect of an FR-S roadster has been taken off the table entirely. Apparently Scion lobbied parent company Toyota to produce just such a model, but after failing to find other markets interested enough in the model to put it into production, corporate HQ said no. "I think we were pretty aggressive on our (submitted plan), but we looked at what we would have conceivably lost on the product and said, 'We're not going to even push it further,'" Murtha said, going on to note, "Nobody was more disappointed than we were." Murtha further shot down the idea of a turbo version of the FR-S, dismissing it as a prospect the blogosphere (that's us) wanted to happen but "that's not something that's coming." Either variant might have helped Scion and Toyota boost sales of the model (which are predictably dropping after their first two years on the market), but the investment also might not have paid off their development, tooling and marketing costs. Of course, Murtha can only speak for Toyota, but we'd be surprised to see Subaru go it alone on either model, as costs would be that much more prohibitive without a partner. Bummer.
Scion was slain by Toyota, not the Great Recession
Wed, Feb 3 2016Scion didn't have to go down like this. Through the magic of hindsight and hubris, it's easier to see what went wrong. And what might have been. What the industry should understand is this: Scion wasn't a losing proposition from the get-go. Its death is due to negligence and apathy. This is more than just the failure of a sub-brand. It's the failure of a company to deliver new and compelling products over an extended period of time. Toyota will point to the Great Recession as the reason it hedged its bets and withdrew funding for new vehicles, instead of using that as an opportunity to redouble efforts. This was as good as a death warrant, although myopically no one realized it at the time. Sadly, GM's Saturn experiment was a road map for this exact form of failure. No one at Toyota seemed to think the Saturn experience was worth protecting their experimental brand from. Or they weren't heard. Brands live and die on product. Somehow, Scion convinced itself that its real success metric was a youthful demographic of buyers. It seems like this was used to gauge the overall health of the brand. Look at the aging and uncompetitive tC, which Scion proudly noted had a 29-year-old average buyer. That fails to take into account its lack of curb appeal and flagging sales. Who cares if the declining number of people buying your cars are younger? Toyota is going to kill the tC thirteen years [And two indifferent generations ... - Ed.] after it was introduced. In that time, Honda has come out with three entirely new generations of the Civic. Scion wasn't a losing proposition from the get-go. Its death is due to negligence and apathy. At launch, the brand could have gone a few different ways. The xB was plucky, interesting, and useful – a tough mix of ephemeral characteristics – but the xA didn't offer much except a thin veneer of self-consciously applied attitude. That's ok; it was cute. Enter the tC, which managed to combine sporty pretensions with decent cost. It took on the Civic Coupe in the contest for coolness, and usually managed to win. More importantly, an explicit brand value early on was a desire to avoid second generations of any of its models, promising a continually evolving and fresh lineup. At this point, the road splits. Down one lane lies the Scion that could have been. After a short but reasonable product lifecycle, it would have renewed the entire lineup.