Advertising:
2010 Toyota Rav 4 2.5l Vvt-i Dohc In-line 4cyl, One Owner, Rebuilt Salvage Title on 2040-cars
Year:2010
Mileage:13661
Color:
Location:
Fort Edward, New York, United States
|
Very Nice 2010 Toyota RAV 4 for sale, Black with tan cloth interior, 2.5L VVT-i DOHC 16Valve In-line 4Cyl Engine, Automatic, Cruise, A/C, power windows, power locks, power windows, steel wheels, tilt, rear storage and much more. Runs and drives very well. The exterior and interior are in good condition, Mileage that shows is 13,661 (see note*). This 2010 Toyota RAV 4 was
purchased as a water damaged car from Superstorm Sandy. Over 500,000 vehicles
were damaged by the storm. There were so many that the insurance
companies totaled the cars in large groups without the time to test or check
them. All the batteries were disconnected. Because the batteries
were disconnected the “true mileage” ( note*) when totaled was unknown.
In most cases the mileage on the odometer is accurate and reflects the
Autocheck paperwork, but the mileage is considered unknown. The list of repairs for the car include: all fluids changed, wiring issues repaired, interior work on vehicle completed, complete cleaning and detailing. Absolute Auto Credit is a dealership that has been in
business for over 25 years. We have a full staff on premises that completely
inspects every vehicle that is sold. The cars go through a rigid New Payment
in full is required within 3 days of close of auction. Shipping
arrangements and fees are the responsibility of the buyer. Pick up is in Upstate If you would like to see the vehicle in person please call 518-745-0316 to make arrangements. AutoCheck Vehicle History Report2010 Report Run Date: 2013-09-04 13:11:30.761
EDT Report Summary·
Class: CUV - Entry Level ·
Engine: 2.5L I4 SFI ·
Country of Assembly: ·
Vehicle Age: 3 year(s) ·
Calculated Owners: 1 ·
VIN: 2T3ZF4DV4AW050139 ·
Year : 2010 ·
Make : ·
Model: RAV4 ·
Style/Body: Hardtop 4D
AccidentCheckNot all accidents / issues are reported to AutoCheck Title and ProblemCheck
OdometerCheck
Vehicle Use and EventCheck
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Toyota RAV4 for Sale
Sport suv 2.5l
Low miles alloy wheels automatic sunroof cruise control off lease only(US $15,999.00)
Red gray one owner finance wheels power cruise control camera mp3 ipod bluetooth
Automatic factory warranty cruise control cd player all power off lease only(US $13,999.00)
2011 toyota rav4 limited 4wd damaged clean title priced to sell wont last l@@k!(US $8,450.00)
Toyota rav 4 2008 4wd dark metalic gray excellant to very good condition(US $17,000.00)
Auto Services in New York
Zuniga Upholstery ★★★★★
Automobile Parts & Supplies, Upholsterers, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 31 Crown St, Brightwaters
Phone: (866) 595-6470
Westbury Nissan ★★★★★
New Car Dealers
Address: 15 Kinkel St, Locust-Valley
Phone: (516) 338-5600
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 907 Old Country Rd, Old-Westbury
Phone: (516) 334-1442
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 7374 Pittsford Palmyra Rd, Port-Gibson
Phone: (585) 223-1840
Value Auto Sales Inc ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service
Address: 4854 Broadway, Wales-Center
Phone: (866) 595-6470
TM & T Tire ★★★★★
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Tire Dealers
Address: North-Salem
Phone: (718) 729-3500
Auto blog
Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota
Wed, Feb 25 2015It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study
Suppliers love Toyota and Honda: Why that matters to you
Mon, May 15 2017You might think that a survey of automotive suppliers and their relationship with OEMs is the automotive equivalent of nerd prom. In some ways that's what the North American Automotive OEM-Supplier Working Relations Index (WRI) is. The study, the 17th annual conducted by Planning Perspectives Inc., is based on input from 652 salespeople from 108 Tier One suppliers, or, PPI points out, 40 of the top 50 automotive suppliers in North America. Suppliers to General Motors, Ford, FCA, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan. But the results have consequences in terms of tens of millions of dollars for OEMs - and in the quality, technology, and cost of the next vehicle you buy. There are a couple of ways to look at the results of the WRI. One is, "So what else is new?" And the other is, "Damn! How did that happen?" The study looks at five relationship areas — OEM Supplier Relationship; OEM Communication; OEM Help; OEM Hindrance; Supplier Profit Opportunity — within six purchasing areas — Body-in-White; Chassis; Electrical/Electronics; Exterior; Interior; Powertrain. In the overall rankings, Toyota is on top for the 15 th time in 17 years, with a score of 328. Honda, the only company to best Toyota (in 2009 and 2010), comes in second, at 319. Those two companies, explains John Henke, president of PPI, have collaborative working arrangements with colleagues and suppliers alike built into the very fabric of their cultures. This, however, is not a situation where one can readily conclude it is about "Japanese companies," because the third company with headquarters on the island of Honshu, Nissan, came in dead last. This is the "How did that happen?" portion. The Nissan score of 203 puts it 125 points behind Toyota. There hasn't been a number that low since the then-Chrysler Corp. scored 187 in 2010, when the company was clawing its way out of the recession. Clearly, the suppliers don't feel particularly engaged by the buyers at Nissan. Henke explains that whether a company does well or not on the WRI is rather simple. All people do things based on what they're measured on. "If you're measured on taking 10% out of your annual buy, you immediately know how to do it. But if you're also measured on improving relations, suddenly there is a new dynamic as to what you can do to achieve both.
Bibendum 2014: Former EU President says Toyota could lose 100,000 euros per hydrogen FCV sedan
Thu, Nov 13 2014Pat Cox does not work for Toyota and we don't think he has any secret inside information. Still, he's the former President of the European Parliament and the current high level coordinator for TransEuropean Network, so when he says Toyota is likely going to lose between 50,000 and 100,000 euros ($66,000 and $133,000) on each of the hydrogen-powered FCV sedans it will sell next year, it's worth noting. That was just one highlight of Cox's presentation at the 2014 Michelin Challenge Bibendum in Chengdu, China today, which addressed the main problem of using more H2 in transportation: cost. The EU has a tremendous incentive to find an alternative to fossil fuels, since Europe today is 94 percent dependent on oil for its transportation sector and 84 percent of that 94 percent dependency is imported oil. The tab for that costs the EU a billion euros a day, Cox said, on top of the environmental costs. To encourage a shift away from petroleum, European Directive 2014/94 requires each member state to develop national policy frameworks for the market development of alternative fuels and their infrastructure. For the member states that choose to fulfill 2014/94 by developing a hydrogen market – and to be clear, Cox said, it's not an EU diktat that they do so, since a number of other alternatives are also allowed – the aim is to have things in place by the end of 2025. The plans don't even have to be submitted until the end of 2016. The long lead time is due to a quirk in a hydrogen economy. In hydrogen infrastructure, "the first-mover cost is not the first-mover advantage, but the firstmover disadvantage." – Pat Cox In deploying a hydrogen infrastructure, Cox said, "the first-mover cost is not the first-mover advantage, but the first-mover disadvantage, and high risk." That's why the EU and member states will financially support the early stages, but everyone agrees that "if this is to work, it will have to be ultimately and essentially a commercially viable and commercially driven infrastructure roll-out." Since 1986, European Union research programs have spent 550 million euros on hydrogen-related and fuel-cell-related research, including methods of hydrogen storage and distribution as well as improved fuel cells vehicles, Cox said. Expensive problems remain to be solved. At a conference in Berlin, Germany this past summer, Cox said, the unit cost of the refueling stations was identified as the main problem.