2008 Toyota Prius Touring - Navigation - Back Up Camera - !! Low Miles !! on 2040-cars
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Body Type:Hatchback
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Hybrid-Electric
For Sale By:Dealer
Make: Toyota
Model: Prius
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 56,692
Sub Model: NAVIGATION * BACKUP CAMERA * BLUETOOTH
Exterior Color: Tan
Interior Color: Tan
Doors: 4
Number of Cylinders: 4
Engine Description: 1.5L L4 FI DOHC 16V
Toyota Prius for Sale
- 2012 toyota prius three hatchback 4-door 1.8l(US $21,989.00)
- 2012 toyota prius base 1.8l 10k miles bluetooth usb **free ca shipping**(US $16,500.00)
- 2009 toyota prius touring hatchback 4-door 1.5l(US $15,000.00)
- 2001 toyota prius hybrid 82.245 miles 47 mpg amazing gas saver(US $4,500.00)
- 2006 toyota prius, one owner, low mileage, perfect condition, super clean(US $11,700.00)
- 2007 black touring!(US $14,477.00)
Auto Services in Tennessee
Troy`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Tire World & Auto Service ★★★★★
Snider Automotive ★★★★★
Simple Auto Repair ★★★★★
Safari Auto Sales ★★★★★
Roberts Auto Sales Lot 1 ★★★★★
Auto blog
Toyota's production fuel cell car to cost between $50-100k
Fri, 03 May 2013
While the cost of building a hydrogen fuel cell vehicle continues to go down over time, reports over the last few years have steadily maintained that the first Toyota hydrogen-powered vehicles for customers should ring up for around $50,000. Company officials cited this figure way back in 2010, and have reiterated it in subsequent years.
So, while a recent Automotive News report about the cost of Toyota's 2015 Hydrogen car doesn't offer up any new figures, it does offer an interesting pricing wrinkle. According to the report, the "cost factor" for the hydrogen vehicles will be in the $50k ballpark, meaning the retail price could be anywhere from there, up to as much as around $100,000.
Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #336 LIVE!
Mon, 10 Jun 2013We're set to record Autoblog Podcast #336 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments via our Q&A module below. Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our UStream (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.
Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #336
Jeep rear-mounted fuel tank controversy
Ford fights back against patent trolls
Fri, Feb 13 2015Some people are just awful. Some organizations are just as awful. And when those people join those organizations, we get stories like this one, where Ford has spent the past several years combatting so-called patent trolls. According to Automotive News, these malicious organizations have filed over a dozen lawsuits against the company since 2012. They work by purchasing patents, only to later accuse companies of misusing intellectual property, despite the fact that the so-called patent assertion companies never actually, you know, do anything with said intellectual property. AN reports that both Hyundai and Toyota have been victimized by these companies, with the former forced to pay $11.5 million to a company called Clear With Computers. Toyota, meanwhile, settled with Paice LLC, over its hybrid tech. The world's largest automaker agreed to pay $5 million, on top of $98 for every hybrid it sold (if the terms of the deal included each of the roughly 1.5 million hybrids Toyota sold since 2000, the company would have owed $147 million). Including the previous couple of examples, AN reports 107 suits were filed against automakers last year alone. But Ford is taking action to prevent further troubles... kind of. The company has signed on with a firm called RPX, in what sounds strangely like a protection racket. Automakers like Ford pay RPX around $1.5 million each year for access to its catalog of patents, which it spent nearly $1 billion building. "We take the protection and licensing of patented innovations very seriously," Ford told AN via email. "And as many smart businesses are doing, we are taking proactive steps to protect against those seeking patent infringement litigation." What are your thoughts on this? Should this patent business be better managed? Is it reasonable that companies purchase patents only to file suit against the companies that build actual products? Have your say in Comments.