HERE IS MY 2001 TOYOTA HIGHLANDER. . LAST YEAR I REPLACED THE WHOLE REAR END AND EXAUST SYSTEM. 3 YEARS AGO ALL NEW STRUTS.WERE REPLACED AND A NEW FRONT WINDOW INSTALLED, NEWER STEEL RIMS & TIRES. THE RESON FOR SELLING IS THE MOTOR HAS FAILED AND NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. THIS CAR IS SOLD AS IS AND I ONLY WANT SOMEONE TO HAVE IT THAT WILL RESTORE IT OR USE IT TO RESTORE ANOTHER HIGHLANDER, THE BODY HAS NO DAMAGE AND NEVER BEEN IN AN ACCIDENT. THE ONLY PROBLEM IS THE REAR PASAGER SIDE DOOR HAS A SMALL DENT WHERE MY SON LET IT HIT A BARRIER WHEN HE OPEN THE DOOR. YOU CAN SEE THE PICTURES. READ ELECTRIC WINDOW HAS FAILED ON THE REAR PASSANGER SIDE.
|
Toyota Highlander for Sale
- 2009 limited used 3.5l v6 24v automatic awd suv leather alloy wheels fog lights(US $25,382.00)
- 2011 toyota highlander low mils, leather seats, backup camera, sunroof, l@@k
- 2001 toyota highlander limited 3.0l v6 leather clean florida car fwd we finance(US $7,999.00)
- 2011 toyota highlander ltd sunroof nav rear cam 38k mi texas direct auto(US $29,980.00)
- 2010 toyota highlander hybrid limited sport utility 4-door 3.3l
- 3.5l 4x4 1 one owner four wheel drive 3rd row seat bluetooth usb mp3 power seat
Auto blog
Scion was slain by Toyota, not the Great Recession
Wed, Feb 3 2016Scion didn't have to go down like this. Through the magic of hindsight and hubris, it's easier to see what went wrong. And what might have been. What the industry should understand is this: Scion wasn't a losing proposition from the get-go. Its death is due to negligence and apathy. This is more than just the failure of a sub-brand. It's the failure of a company to deliver new and compelling products over an extended period of time. Toyota will point to the Great Recession as the reason it hedged its bets and withdrew funding for new vehicles, instead of using that as an opportunity to redouble efforts. This was as good as a death warrant, although myopically no one realized it at the time. Sadly, GM's Saturn experiment was a road map for this exact form of failure. No one at Toyota seemed to think the Saturn experience was worth protecting their experimental brand from. Or they weren't heard. Brands live and die on product. Somehow, Scion convinced itself that its real success metric was a youthful demographic of buyers. It seems like this was used to gauge the overall health of the brand. Look at the aging and uncompetitive tC, which Scion proudly noted had a 29-year-old average buyer. That fails to take into account its lack of curb appeal and flagging sales. Who cares if the declining number of people buying your cars are younger? Toyota is going to kill the tC thirteen years [And two indifferent generations ... - Ed.] after it was introduced. In that time, Honda has come out with three entirely new generations of the Civic. Scion wasn't a losing proposition from the get-go. Its death is due to negligence and apathy. At launch, the brand could have gone a few different ways. The xB was plucky, interesting, and useful – a tough mix of ephemeral characteristics – but the xA didn't offer much except a thin veneer of self-consciously applied attitude. That's ok; it was cute. Enter the tC, which managed to combine sporty pretensions with decent cost. It took on the Civic Coupe in the contest for coolness, and usually managed to win. More importantly, an explicit brand value early on was a desire to avoid second generations of any of its models, promising a continually evolving and fresh lineup. At this point, the road splits. Down one lane lies the Scion that could have been. After a short but reasonable product lifecycle, it would have renewed the entire lineup.
8 car technologies designed to keep you safe
Thu, Feb 22 2018Technologies are always advancing forward, especially in your vehicle. As more safety technologies are being introduced into the market, it can be hard to keep track of everything. So here are 8 technologies designed to keep you safe on the road. Want more coverage? Head over to http://bit.ly/2CcOngW Ford Kia Mercedes-Benz Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Volvo Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video FCA automatic emergency braking
Vote to unionize Toyota Canada plant faces delay
Fri, 04 Apr 2014Volkswagen isn't the only automaker with high-profile unionization efforts afoot at one of its North American factories. Unifor, Canada's largest private-sector union, is attempting to organize Toyota's factories in Ontario, reports Reuters. A vote was originally set for next week, but Unifor has apparently found more workers eligible to vote, delaying the proceedings. It hasn't rescheduled the ballot yet, but claims there are 7,500 employees with the right to vote, with over 3,000 having already signed union cards.
Toyota is pushing against organizing, saying that workers already have a payment and benefits near the top of the industry, and noting that it has never laid off a permanent employee in Canada. Unifor has reportedly countered by saying that about a quarter of the workforce is operating under a temporary contract, which receives lower benefits.
The automaker has three factories in Ontario - two in Cambridge and one in Woodstock. To form a union, a majority of eligible employees must vote to join Unifor. If successful, they would be the first wholly owned Toyota plants in North America to be organized. Previous attempts to unionize the Japanese automaker's Canadian factories in 2001 and 2008 failed due to lack of support.