Crew Max Trd Off Road Limited 4x4 Custom New Lift Wheels Tires Nav Roof Leather on 2040-cars
American Fork, Utah, United States
Fuel Type:Flex Fuel Vehicle
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Make: Toyota
Options: Sunroof, Compact Disc
Model: Tundra
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Side Airbag
Mileage: 22
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Sub Model: CrewMax LIMITED
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Gray
Doors: 4
Number of Cylinders: 8
Cab Type: Crew Cab
Engine Description: 5.7L V8 FI DOHC 32V
Drivetrain: 4-Wheel Drive
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Toyota Tundra for Sale
- One owner perfect carfax only 39k miles perfect carfax(US $21,500.00)
- 2010 toyota tundra 4x4 crewmax platinum
- 2012 toyota tundra(US $38,950.00)
- 2010 toyota tundra(US $38,950.00)
- 2010 grade 5.7l v8 used 5.7l v8 32v automatic rwd premium(US $25,500.00)
- 2001 toyota tundra sr5 ext. cab pick-up clean solid running truck va inspected
Auto Services in Utah
Utah Window Tinting ★★★★★
Utah Valley Tire Inc ★★★★★
Turn Key Service Tech INC ★★★★★
Turn Key Service Tech ★★★★★
Sunburst Automotive Repair ★★★★★
Rocky Mountain Collision of West Valley City ★★★★★
Auto blog
What's in a trademark? Sometimes, the next iconic car name
Thu, 07 Aug 2014
The United States Patent and Trademark Office is a treasure trove for auto enthusiasts, especially those who double as conspiracy theorists.
Why has Toyota applied to trademark "Supra," the name of one of its legendary sports cars, even though it hasn't sold one in the United States in 16 years? Why would General Motors continue to register "Chevelle" long after one of the most famous American muscle cars hit the end of the road? And what could Chrysler possibly do with the rights to "313," the area code for Detroit?
Toyota found not at fault in alleged unintended acceleration crash
Fri, 11 Oct 2013Toyota has already paid out millions and billions of dollars in settlements surrounding unintended acceleration, but the first lawsuit in the matter, which headed to a California court in July, has reached a verdict. Following the 2009 death of Noriko Uno, whose 2006 Camry was hit by another car and then sped out of control before crashing into a tree, the jury found that Toyota was not at fault in the crash.
Even though the 2006 Camry (shown above) wasn't involved in any of the unintended acceleration-related recalls and it was not equipped with a brake override, Automotive News reports that the jury's verdict says there was no defect in the car and actually blames the entire incident on the driver that ran into Uno's car - to the tune of $10 million. The accident started when the other driver ran a stop sign and hit Uno's car, and the report says that medical conditions (including diabetes) caused Uno to fail to stop her Camry.
The AN article also states that this lawsuit was a bellwether case for around 85 other personal-injury and wrongful-death suits against Toyota, but there are still many impending suits across the country. Scroll down for an official statement on this particular case from Toyota.
Automakers want to stop the EPA's fuel economy rules change, and why that's a shortsighted move
Tue, Dec 6 2016With a Trump Administration looming, the EPA moved quickly after the election to propose finalizing future fuel economy rules last week. The auto industry doesn't like that (surprise), and has started making moves to stop the EPA. Ford CEO Mark Fields said he wanted to lobby Trump to lower the standards, and now the Auto Alliance, a manufacturer group, is saying it will join the fight against cleaner cars. The Alliance represents 12 automakers: BMW, Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Jaguar Land Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Porsche, Toyota, VW, and Volvo. Gloria Bergquist, a spokesperson for the Alliance, told Automotive News that the "EPA's sudden and controversial move to propose auto regulations eight months early - even after Congress warned agencies about taking such steps while political appointees were packing their bags - calls out for congressional action to pause this rulemaking until a thoughtful policy review can occur." The EPA was going to consider public comments through April 2017, but then said it would move the deadline to the end of December. That means that it can finalize the rules before President Obama leaves office. The director of public affairs for the Consumer Federation of America, Jack Gillis, said on a conference call with reporters last week when the EPA originally announced its decision that it is unlikely that President Trump will be able to roll back these changes. Gillis also said on the same call that any attempt by the automakers to prevent these changes would be history repeating itself. "These are the same companies that fought airbags, and now promoting the fact that every car has multiple airbags," he said. "These are the same companies that fought the crash-test program, and now are promoting the crash-test ratings published by the government. So, it's clear that they're misperceiving the needs of the American consumer." There are more reasons the Allliance's pushback is flawed. Carol Lee Rawn, the transportation program director for Ceres, said on that call that the automotive industry is a global one, and many automakers are moving to global platforms to help them meet strict fuel economy rules around the world.