1978 Toyota Land Cruiser on 2040-cars
Paradise, Utah, United States
1978 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ40. USA Model. Aftermarket AC.
The 40 was completely broken down into pieces and sent to the sandblaster. The hard top, doors, frame, ambulance
doors, hood, floorboards and windshield were all in good shape. The rear panels, rear sill, front fenders, rocker
panels and wheel wells were replaced using new steel from Cool Cruisers and Real Steel Cruiser Parts. Body work
and paint (in Toyota Olive Brown 653) were all completed professionally.
Also installed is a Old Man Emu suspension springs, shackles, bushings and pins from CC. Shocks are Pro Comp.
Steering Stabilizer is Hell4Stout.
Steering, clutch work correctly. Braking system has undergone a full refurbishment including a new master
cylinder.
Electrical, including all gauges work correctly and are using new signals.
Upholstery - Front seat upholstery done professionally. Rear jump seats are vinyl covers.
Drive Train - Original 4.2 liter 2F engine married to the original 4-speed transmission and stock transfer case.
The engine as gone through a basic tune-up and has more power than any other 2F on the road. Brand new carburetor
from Spector. All smog equipment still in the vehicle.
Wheels/Tires - Brand new 33x10.50 15 BFG AT's on stock wheels that were sandblasted and powder coated in original
Toyota grey.
Soft goods - headliner, emblems, rubber, weatherstripping, mats, pads, etc are all new.
Toyota Land Cruiser for Sale
1984 toyota land cruiser fj60(US $15,400.00)
1995 toyota land cruiser(US $14,000.00)
1984 toyota land cruiser bj42(US $22,400.00)
1974 toyota land cruiser(US $14,700.00)
1984 toyota land cruiser(US $16,450.00)
1980 toyota land cruiser(US $13,300.00)
Auto Services in Utah
Westech Equipment ★★★★★
Tony Divino Toyota ★★★★★
Tony Divino Toyota ★★★★★
Secor Motors Inc ★★★★★
Rogers Automotive ★★★★★
Leavitt Automotive of Saint George ★★★★★
Auto blog
Toyota recalls 209,000 FJ Cruisers over seatbelt issue
Sat, 16 Mar 2013Toyota has announced that it will be issuing a substantial recall of the FJ Cruiser for a problem that could cause the front seatbelt retractors to separate from the vehicle body. This recall will apply to all FJ Cruisers - from 2007 through 2013 - totaling around 209,000 units.
The problem stems from the FJ Cruiser's pillarless door opening design that has the front-occupant seatbelts attached to the rear doors. Toyota says that when the rear doors are "repeatedly and forcefully closed," the retractor could completely separate from the door frame.
While there is no information about this recall from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration yet, Toyota says that there have been no accidents or injuries associated with this issue. No specific fix or recall date are given, but the official press release is posted below.
Toyota Supra ready for its retrospective video closeup
Mon, 20 May 2013Our friends at XCAR have taken the time to train their lenses on the iconic Toyota Supra. With Toyota finally back into the performance car game, it seems only logical to remember one of the brand's most legendary sports cars. While we're all busy ladling praise onto the Scion FR-S and Subaru BRZ twins, it's important to remember that Toyota used to produce all manner of fun-to-drive machinery. The Supra once sat at the top of that list, its most recent iteration giving buyers the option of a ludicrous forced-induction inline six, gorgeous styling and plenty of presence.
Of course, the legend didn't stop once the Supra fell off American order sheets in 1998. Always an aftermarket darling, the Supra has gone on to become a tuner favorite in nearly every corner of grassroots motorsport. From drag racing to road racing and everywhere in between, the Supra is remains a force to be reckoned with nearly 15 years after it last prowled the US auto market. You can catch the tribute from XCAR below.
Hello, Siri? Please don't crash the car
Tue, Oct 7 2014Hands on the wheel and eyes on the road? You could still be distracted while driving. Voice-recognition software that many automakers tout as a safer alternative to handheld devices can still divert drivers' attention, a new study published by AAA found. Researchers noted that workload ratings were the highest on their scales when participants in the study used Siri. The technology is alluring because it allows drivers to do things like change the radio station or compose a text message without removing their hands from the wheel or their gaze from the road. But many of those tasks increase a driver's cognitive workload. Depending on the situation, that can be dangerous. "It's especially problematic, because you can be distracted and not know it," J. Peter Kissinger, president of the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, told Autoblog. "That's the nature of mental distraction. It's hard to appreciate. ... Often, you don't know you're distracted until it's too late." There's significant variation in the results of the study. Simple, single-task car commands for operations like changing the radio station caused minimal increases in workload, about the same as listening to an audio book. Composing information using speech-to-text technology was more burdensome, and using menu-based functions caused a high level of cognitive workload. Siri-based interactions posed the highest levels of distraction, according to AAA. Researchers noted that workload ratings were the highest on their scales when participants in the study used Siri, and two of the three simulator crashes they observed during the study of 36 participants came while the subjects were interacting with Siri. The subjects weren't looking at nor making contact with their iPhones during these interactions. "Common issues involved inconsistencies in which Siri would produce different responses to seemingly identical commands," the researchers wrote. "In other circumstances, Siri required exact phrases to accomplish specific tasks and subtle deviations from that phrasing would result in a failure. ... Some participants also reported frustration with Siri's occasional sarcasm and wit." It wasn't just the complexity of the task that caused variations in level of distraction – the variations could also be dependent on the particular make and model of the car being tested.