Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2007 Toyota Fj Cruiser Sport Utility 4-door 4.0l Arb Winch 40600 Miles Mint on 2040-cars

US $23,900.00
Year:2007 Mileage:40600 Color: Yellow /
 Black
Location:

Durango, Colorado, United States

Durango, Colorado, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Sport Utility
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.0L 3956CC 241Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: Jtebu11f470081418
Year: 2007
Make: Toyota
Model: FJ Cruiser
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: Base Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 40,600
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Yellow
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 6

This is a very low mileage 2007 FJ Cruiser.    
Very well maintained.  
Runs and drives perfectly.  
New truck coming so this one has to go. 


  • 40600 miles

  • 6 speed manual

  • Full Time 4wd

  • Optional Locking Rear Diff

  • ARB Bumper

  • Warn Winch with Remote

  • PIAA lights

  • 2” Lift

  • Old Man EMU shocks/Springs

  • Bridgestone Blizzak Tires with less than 500 miles

  • Car Cover

  • Always garaged

  • Zero Accidents (one small dent in rear bumper)

  • Extra windshield wipers included

  • 2” Tow hitch

  • One small dent in rear bumper- as seen in pictures.


Located in Durango, CO. Shipping cost at buyer's expense, but can assist in process.

Bid with confidence, BikeCharlotte has over 1350 positive feedback over 15 years and this auction will continue that trend.

Auto Services in Colorado

Wreckmasters Body and Frame ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 315 S 14th St, Colorado-Springs
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Wizard Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 2271 W Evans Ave, Aurora
Phone: (888) 690-3854

Tire Warehouse ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 4095 S Santa Fe Dr, Englewood
Phone: (303) 934-2929

Tapp`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Consultants
Address: 8000 E Mississippi Ave, Aurora
Phone: (303) 752-2880

T & R Towing & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: Lochbuie
Phone: (303) 659-6747

Stu Ritter Mercedes-Benz ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 1250 S Inca St, Aurora
Phone: (303) 698-2431

Auto blog

Toyota FT-86 Open Concept leaves us feeling flushed

Wed, 20 Nov 2013

When last we checked in on our topless would-be hero, the Toyota FT-86 convertible had been reportedly placed on "indefinite hold." That was back in early October, not long after Toyota had trotted out the rear-wheel-drive canvasback to Scion dealers as a possible future product carrot if they decided not to turn in their franchises. And yet, we're here at the Tokyo Motor Show, where Toyota has taken the time to at least repaint the FT-86 Open Concept in "Flash Red," if not build a whole other car (the original Geneva showcar was white). It's enough to make our heads spin like a teenager on the verge of a breakup. Will they? Won't they?
At this point, we still don't know any more than you do - the last word we heard out of Toyota was not encouraging, although the story was that the program could still be fast-tracked if management had a change of heart. As the car has never been seen before in Japan, perhaps Toyota is merely extending its domestic audience a courtesy view before it lines this showcar in mothballs, or maybe they're still trying to make a decision on its fate and gauging public reaction on the homefront.
Interestingly, in a new story published today, Automotive News quotes Subaru brand boss Yasuyuki Yoshinaga downplaying the likelihood of a production model, saying flatly "We make the car, so if we don't make it, it can't happen." The executive went on to note, "Our engineering department told me that losing the entire roof requires a complete redesign of the structure. It would need a big change." Given that such a car would probably trade in rather small volumes, that sounds like a significant hurtle.

Dutch Toyota dealer has plans for old Prius batteries as solar backup

Thu, May 1 2014

A Toyota dealer in the Netherlands is looking to the sky for power. The Louwman Hague Toyota dealership has put almost 1,000 solar panels on the roof, and there might be some Prius hybrid batteries involved. Our Dutch isn't as good as it could be and our questions to Toyota in the US haven't turned up any definitive answers, but there is some mention that these solar panels are will someday be feeding power into a bank of Toyota hybrid batteries. The 1,000 panels make up 1,600 square meters, about the size of 4.5 IMAX movie screens, and is the largest in the area. They generate around a quarter of a megawatt of energy [as our readers point out, this is what the translation says, but it doesn't make sense, so we think it might mean a quarter MW of power a day], which is enough to power 80 homes. The excess electricity will go into the battery packs that have (possibly) already been used in a Prius or another of the company's hybrid. There are many examples of automotive batteries being tested as stationary back-up power sources, and maybe this Dutch solution can be used as a guide when Toyota sets up its new US headquarters in sunny Texas.

The ugly economics of green vehicles

Sat, Sep 20 2014

It's fair to say that most consumers would prefer a green vehicle, one that has a lower impact on the environment and goes easy on costly fuel (in all senses of the term). The problem is that most people can't – or won't – pay the price premium or put up with the compromises today's green cars demand. We're not all "cashed-up greenies." In 2013, the average selling price of a new vehicle was $32,086. The truth is that most Americans can't afford a new car, green or not. In 2013, the average selling price of a new vehicle was $32,086. According to a recent Federal Reserve study, the median income for American families was $46,700 in 2013, a five-percent decline from $49,000 in 2010. While $32,000 for a car may not sound like a lot to some, it's about $630 a month financing for 48 months, assuming the buyer can come up with a $6,400 down payment. And that doesn't include gas, insurance, taxes, maintenance and all the rest. It's no wonder that a recent study showed that the average family could afford a new car in only one of 25 major US cities. AutoTrader conducted a recent survey of 1,900 millennials (those born between 1980 and 2000) about their new and used car buying habits. Isabelle Helms, AutoTrader's vice president of research, said millennials are "big on small" vehicles, which tend to be more affordable. Millennials also yearn for alternative-powered vehicles, but "they generally can't afford them." When it comes to the actual behavior of consumers, the operative word is "affordable," not "green." In 2012, US new car sales rose to 14.5 million. But according to Manheim Research, at 40.5 million units, used car sales were almost three times as great. While the days of the smoke-belching beater are mostly gone, it's a safe bet that the used cars are far less green in terms of gas mileage, emissions, new technology, etc., than new ones. Who Pays the Freight? Green cars, particularly alternative-fuel green cars, cost more than their conventional gas-powered siblings. A previous article discussed how escalating costs and limited utility drove me away from leasing a hydrogen fuel cell-powered Hyundai Tucson, which at $50,000, was nearly twice the cost of the equivalent gas-powered version. In Hyundai's defense, it's fair to ask who should pay the costs of developing and implementing new technology vehicles and the infrastructure to support them.