Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1998 Toyota 4runner Sr5 Sport Utility 4-door 3.4l on 2040-cars

US $3,000.00
Year:1998 Mileage:186696 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Sherman, Connecticut, United States

Sherman, Connecticut, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:V6
VIN: Jt3hn86r7w0189901 Mileage: 186,696
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 6
Year: 1998
Make: Toyota
Model: 4Runner
Trim: Sr5
Options: Sunroof, Cassette Player, 4-Wheel Drive
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Drive Type: 4wd
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1998 Toyota 4 Runner SR5 4WD
 
 186K. Body in excellent shape, no rot or dents. Mechanically sound, daily driver. 

Interior has some dirt/stains to mats and seats that may come clean with a wash. Husky floorliners in the front. One tear in drivers seat seam. Center Console has a crack. Crack in cargo area lining. Windshield is cracked- does not affect drive ability. 
The exhaust needs work as well. Almost all mileage highway miles, makes 90-mile round trip daily. Passed CT emissions inspection within last 8 months.
 
• V6 Engine
• Working AC, F&R Climate Zones
• PS/PB
• AM/FM/Cassette- power antenna does not work
• Power Windows/Locks
• Power Sunroof
• Power Window in Tailgate
• 4WD – excellent in snow
• Good AT Tires
• HD Floor Mats
• Cargo Cover
• Full-size Spare
 
 Located in CT, pick up only. Happy to show the 4runner- send me an emails with questions. Thanks.
 
 

Auto Services in Connecticut

RPM Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 186 Boston Post Rd, Whitneyville
Phone: (203) 299-2061

Ron`s Auto Body & Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 934 Hanover Rd, Meriden
Phone: (203) 639-9114

Pisano Bros Automotive Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 117 Jefferson St, New-Canaan
Phone: (203) 961-0778

On The Line Autobody Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4 Miller Rd, Ridgefield
Phone: (845) 628-9000

Northeast Diesel Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Bus Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 1293 Norwich Rd, Windham
Phone: (860) 230-0707

New England Collision ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 465 Derby Ave, New-Haven
Phone: (203) 389-6400

Auto blog

Hello, Siri? Please don't crash the car

Tue, Oct 7 2014

Hands on the wheel and eyes on the road? You could still be distracted while driving. Voice-recognition software that many automakers tout as a safer alternative to handheld devices can still divert drivers' attention, a new study published by AAA found. Researchers noted that workload ratings were the highest on their scales when participants in the study used Siri. The technology is alluring because it allows drivers to do things like change the radio station or compose a text message without removing their hands from the wheel or their gaze from the road. But many of those tasks increase a driver's cognitive workload. Depending on the situation, that can be dangerous. "It's especially problematic, because you can be distracted and not know it," J. Peter Kissinger, president of the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, told Autoblog. "That's the nature of mental distraction. It's hard to appreciate. ... Often, you don't know you're distracted until it's too late." There's significant variation in the results of the study. Simple, single-task car commands for operations like changing the radio station caused minimal increases in workload, about the same as listening to an audio book. Composing information using speech-to-text technology was more burdensome, and using menu-based functions caused a high level of cognitive workload. Siri-based interactions posed the highest levels of distraction, according to AAA. Researchers noted that workload ratings were the highest on their scales when participants in the study used Siri, and two of the three simulator crashes they observed during the study of 36 participants came while the subjects were interacting with Siri. The subjects weren't looking at nor making contact with their iPhones during these interactions. "Common issues involved inconsistencies in which Siri would produce different responses to seemingly identical commands," the researchers wrote. "In other circumstances, Siri required exact phrases to accomplish specific tasks and subtle deviations from that phrasing would result in a failure. ... Some participants also reported frustration with Siri's occasional sarcasm and wit." It wasn't just the complexity of the task that caused variations in level of distraction – the variations could also be dependent on the particular make and model of the car being tested.

2014 Toyota Prius crash test rating drops to four stars

Thu, Jan 16 2014

If nothing has changed, then how come something changed? That's the question behind the recent drop from five to four stars in the crash test rating for the Toyota Prius. As you can see on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) website, the 2014 Prius gets four stars overall while the 2013 got five. The two cars are basically identical, so what gives? Toyota says it is not sure why NHTSA rated the Prius a four this time. Starting with the 2011 model year, NHTSA updated its rating system and says in a FAQ that vehicles that had four- or five-star ratings could get lower ratings "even if no changes have been made to the vehicle." Green Car Reports says that the issue is a new set of frontal barrier tests that were conducted on the 2014 Prius last month and that resulted in the first new bits of crash test data for the car in years. The 2012 and 2013 Prius models were rated based on tests done in February 2011 on a 2011 Prius. All of these are variants of the third-generation model. The next-gen Prius is expected in 2015. Jana Hartline, environmental communication manager at Toyota Motor Sales, USA, told AutoblogGreen that the company doesn't quite know what's going on with the drop in crash test scores: There have been no changes in the test standards and no changes in the car, other than minor reinforcement for small overlap crash test which we believe did not compromise integrity. We are not sure why it rated a 4 this time. We are looking at the test results and we are confident the new generation will move back to 5 stars. 2014 Prius still has a five-star rating for the side crash test and four in the rollover test. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.

Toyota engineer warns automous cars could increase fuel use, urban sprawl

Fri, 18 Jul 2014

An increasing number of people are starting to consider the potential downsides of a transition to autonomous cars. The FBI is already looking at them for the potential ill effects on law enforcement, and a scientist for Toyota is raising the possibility that driverless vehicles could actually be detrimental to the environment over the long term.
Ken Laberteaux, who studies future transportation for Toyota, thinks that autonomous cars could lead to more pollution, not less, says Bloomberg. However, Laberteaux's theory isn't so much based purely on science as it is considering behavioral and historical trends. "US history shows that anytime you make driving easier, there seems to be this inexhaustible desire to live further from things," said Laberteaux during a presentation at the Automated Vehicles Symposium in San Francisco, CA, cited by Bloomberg.
Laberteaux's belief is that if commuters can make their drives easier, then they will be more willing to live farther away from the cities where they work. The end result would be more urban sprawl and increased pollution from the longer travel times.