Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Toyota 4runner Sport Sr5 Expedition Build 4x4 Beautiful on 2040-cars

US $2,000.00
Year:2002 Mileage:167000 Color: Gray /
 Gray
Location:

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Trenton, New Jersey, United States
Advertising:


Beautiful Expedition 4runner Sport 4x4, 1 Owner, Clean no accident CARFAX! Factory Loaded, Power Options, Sport Edition, Sunroof, etc. This beautiful 4Runner 4x4 Sport is a well preserved SUV. It has No-Accident and clean CARFAX/Auto-check reports. The interior is in beautiful condition presenting itself like a very low mile 4Runner Sport and the exterior looks wonderful. This 4Runner will take you anywhere you want to go and get there as comfortable as any SUV produced and it will do it for many years to come. Email me or text me for more details!

Email: Sonya.Med.ina8@gmail.com
Cell#: (614) 385-1424





Auto Services in New Jersey

Vitos Auto Electric ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 1374 Stuyvesant Ave, Elizabeth
Phone: (908) 688-3818

Town Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 107 Grove St, Essex-Fells
Phone: (973) 744-0808

Tony`s Auto Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 711 W Oregon Ave, Audubon
Phone: (215) 389-6129

Stan`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 714 Old Shore Rd, Barnegat-Lgt
Phone: (609) 242-7826

Sam`s Window Tinting ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Automobile Detailing
Address: 132 E Route 59, Pompton-Lakes
Phone: (845) 623-3800

Rdn Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 344 S Main St, Long-Beach-Township
Phone: (609) 698-2100

Auto blog

Hello, Siri? Please don't crash the car

Tue, Oct 7 2014

Hands on the wheel and eyes on the road? You could still be distracted while driving. Voice-recognition software that many automakers tout as a safer alternative to handheld devices can still divert drivers' attention, a new study published by AAA found. Researchers noted that workload ratings were the highest on their scales when participants in the study used Siri. The technology is alluring because it allows drivers to do things like change the radio station or compose a text message without removing their hands from the wheel or their gaze from the road. But many of those tasks increase a driver's cognitive workload. Depending on the situation, that can be dangerous. "It's especially problematic, because you can be distracted and not know it," J. Peter Kissinger, president of the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, told Autoblog. "That's the nature of mental distraction. It's hard to appreciate. ... Often, you don't know you're distracted until it's too late." There's significant variation in the results of the study. Simple, single-task car commands for operations like changing the radio station caused minimal increases in workload, about the same as listening to an audio book. Composing information using speech-to-text technology was more burdensome, and using menu-based functions caused a high level of cognitive workload. Siri-based interactions posed the highest levels of distraction, according to AAA. Researchers noted that workload ratings were the highest on their scales when participants in the study used Siri, and two of the three simulator crashes they observed during the study of 36 participants came while the subjects were interacting with Siri. The subjects weren't looking at nor making contact with their iPhones during these interactions. "Common issues involved inconsistencies in which Siri would produce different responses to seemingly identical commands," the researchers wrote. "In other circumstances, Siri required exact phrases to accomplish specific tasks and subtle deviations from that phrasing would result in a failure. ... Some participants also reported frustration with Siri's occasional sarcasm and wit." It wasn't just the complexity of the task that caused variations in level of distraction – the variations could also be dependent on the particular make and model of the car being tested.

The ugly economics of green vehicles

Sat, Sep 20 2014

It's fair to say that most consumers would prefer a green vehicle, one that has a lower impact on the environment and goes easy on costly fuel (in all senses of the term). The problem is that most people can't – or won't – pay the price premium or put up with the compromises today's green cars demand. We're not all "cashed-up greenies." In 2013, the average selling price of a new vehicle was $32,086. The truth is that most Americans can't afford a new car, green or not. In 2013, the average selling price of a new vehicle was $32,086. According to a recent Federal Reserve study, the median income for American families was $46,700 in 2013, a five-percent decline from $49,000 in 2010. While $32,000 for a car may not sound like a lot to some, it's about $630 a month financing for 48 months, assuming the buyer can come up with a $6,400 down payment. And that doesn't include gas, insurance, taxes, maintenance and all the rest. It's no wonder that a recent study showed that the average family could afford a new car in only one of 25 major US cities. AutoTrader conducted a recent survey of 1,900 millennials (those born between 1980 and 2000) about their new and used car buying habits. Isabelle Helms, AutoTrader's vice president of research, said millennials are "big on small" vehicles, which tend to be more affordable. Millennials also yearn for alternative-powered vehicles, but "they generally can't afford them." When it comes to the actual behavior of consumers, the operative word is "affordable," not "green." In 2012, US new car sales rose to 14.5 million. But according to Manheim Research, at 40.5 million units, used car sales were almost three times as great. While the days of the smoke-belching beater are mostly gone, it's a safe bet that the used cars are far less green in terms of gas mileage, emissions, new technology, etc., than new ones. Who Pays the Freight? Green cars, particularly alternative-fuel green cars, cost more than their conventional gas-powered siblings. A previous article discussed how escalating costs and limited utility drove me away from leasing a hydrogen fuel cell-powered Hyundai Tucson, which at $50,000, was nearly twice the cost of the equivalent gas-powered version. In Hyundai's defense, it's fair to ask who should pay the costs of developing and implementing new technology vehicles and the infrastructure to support them.

First live photos and impressions of Toyota's 2014 Corolla

Fri, 07 Jun 2013

After releasing official pictures and a press release about an hour earlier, Toyota chose an aircraft hanger at the Santa Monica airport as the venue for the global introduction of its highly anticipated 2014 Corolla. Following an extended aerial acrobat show, which included performers running along the walls, swimmers romping in a massive overhead clear plastic pool and angry dancers destroying their cardboard stage in a glittery fit... the all-new C-segment star of the show was lowered on cables from the ceiling. (After the strobe lights and pounding sound that preceded it, the final vehicle reveal was almost anticlimactic.)
Face-to-face with the eleventh-generation sedan, we liked what we saw. Compared to last year's Corolla, the new model appears smaller in person - yet that is mostly an optical illusion. By the tape, it is four inches longer and slightly wider than its predecessor, but a bit shorter. The wheelbase has been stretched nearly four inches, yet the front and rear overhangs only give or take about an inch in the conversion. With the exception of the enormous wheel/fender gap (the new Corolla seems to ride too high), its overall proportions are very pleasing.
The fresh styling is modern and stylish, with sculpted lines that add character to a formerly bland sedan