Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

~~ Insane Price Ahhh! 2013 Subaru Impreza 4d Hatchback 2.0l I Premium ~~ on 2040-cars

US $17,200.00
Year:2013 Mileage:31876 Color: Conditions
Location:

United States

United States

Not sure what else to tell you... A Subaru is pretty much the best car you can own for all seasons. I think the pictures speak a lot for themselves. I took the pictures right after driving in the rain so that's why the car appears a little dirty in some pictures. This car is basically new. My wife and I bought it new last year and now we need to sell it. We bought it with a full sports package (roof-rack, weather mat in the trunk, fully tinted windows, etc.) and with a three year warranty. We've done every scheduled servicing. The car has not had any problems a flat tire that was fixed and an engine light that came on and was resolved at the shop. All service has been done professionally at Mike Shaw Subaru on 104th in Federal Heights.

~Premium Features:
Full-screen GPS navigation.
Back-up camera.
Heated seats.
Alloy Wheels.
Great sound system.
Lo-Jack installed in case of theft.
Fully-tinted windows.
Roof-rack.
Power everything.

Inspection done on 7/21/14 gave the following results:
~Considered Features:
4WD/AWD
ABS BRAKES
AIR CONDITIONING
ALLOY WHEELS
AM/FM STEREO
AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
AUXILIARY AUDIO INPUT
CD AUDIO
CLOTH SEATS
CRUISE CONTROL
FRONT SEAT HEATERS FULL ROOF RACK
NAVIGATION SYSTEM
OVERHEAD AIRBAGS
POWER LOCKS
POWER MIRRORS
POWER WINDOWS
REAR VIEW CAMERA
SIDE AIRBAGS
SIRIUSXM TRIAL AVAILABLE
TRACTION CONTROL


~Interior Conditions:
Headliner: OK
Front Seats: OK
Rear Seats: OK
3rd Row Seats: OK
Carpet: OK
Dash/Console: OK
Odor: OK
Radio: OK
Windshield: OK
Smoke Smell: OK
Sun Visor: OK

~Mechanical Conditions:
Dash: OK
Transmission: OK
Engine: OK
4WD: OK
A/C: OK
Rear Mechanical: OK
Exhaust: OK
Oil Sludge: OK
Fluids: OK
Odometer: OK
Non US Specs: OK
Convertible Top: OK
Window Motor: OK

~Exterior Conditions
Front TIres: OK
Rear Tires: OK
Wheels: OK
Drive Fender: OK
Hood: OK
Pass Fender: OK
Roof: OK
Trunk Lid/Rear Gate: OK
Driver Front Door: OK
Pass Front Door: Ding(s)
Driver Rear Door: OK
Pass Rear Door: OK
Driver Quarter: OK
Pass Quarter: OK
Rocker Panel: OK
Front Bumper: OK
Rear Bumper: OK
Head Lights: OK
Tail Lights: OK
Grille: OK

~Structural Conditions:
Bed Liner: OK
Pinch Rails: OK
Frame: OK
Bumper Support: OK
Apron: OK
Floorpan: OK
Core Support: OK
Keys: OK
Undercarriage: OK

Auto blog

Consumer Reports says infotainment systems 'growing first-year reliability plague'

Mon, 27 Oct 2014

The Consumer Reports Annual Auto Reliability Survey (right) is out, and the top two spots look much the same as last year's list with Lexus and Toyota in first and second place, respectively. However, there are some major shakeups for 2014, with Acura plunging eight spots from third in 2013 to 11th this year, and Mazda replaces it on the lowest step of the podium. Honda and Audi round out the top five. This year's list includes six Japanese brands in the top 10, two Europeans, one America and one Korean.
Acura isn't the only one taking a tumble, though. Infiniti is the biggest loser this year by dropping 14 spots to 20th place. Other big losses come from Mercedes-Benz with an 11-place fall to 24th, and GMC, which declines 10 positions to 19th.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, it's not traditional mechanical bugs hauling down these automaker's reliability scores. Instead, pesky problems with infotainment systems are taking a series toll on the rankings. According to Consumer Reports, complaints about "in-car electronics" were the most grumbled about element in new cars. Problem areas included things like unresponsive touchscreens, issues pairing phones and multi-use controllers that refused to work right.

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study

2013 Subaru Outback Limited

Wed, 09 Jan 2013

Subaru has given the 2013 Outback a host of detail changes and updates, though you'd hardly know from looking at it. The mild exterior changes mostly go unnoticed, and if you're comparing on a numbers basis, the new 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine is bang-on what the old engine would do. The biggest news is EyeSight, Subaru's new stereo camera-based system that drives lane-departure warning, active cruise control, automatic emergency braking and forward collision alert functions.
The 2013 Outback spent some time in my driveway, and as far as jacked-up wagons with off-road cladding go, this is one of the most affordable of the lot. That doesn't mean it's cheap; the Outback I tried was a Limited model with moonroof, navigation, EyeSight, leather and CVT added on. That takes the Outback from its roughly $25,000 starting point and adds nearly $10,000, landing solidly in the mid-$30,000 range. Still, against its most natural competitors like the Volvo XC70 and Audi A6 Avant, the Outback is a better value.
DRIVING NOTES