2006 Scion Xa on 2040-cars
Clive, Iowa, United States
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Hatchback
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:1.5L 1497CC l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Model: xA
Mileage: 74,000
Exterior Color: Flint Mica
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Charcoal
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 4
Number of Doors: 5
Year: 2006
Trim: Base Hatchback 5-Door
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
This has been an awesome car. All Scheduled maintenance has been done by local mechanic. All records available. Always garaged, looks and drives great. Mostly highway miles as I bought it specifically to drive back and forth to Omaha from Des Moines for work. Non-smoker, title in hand, has the upgraded wheels. Tires only have approximately 5000 miles on them. Feels like new. Makes a perfect first car or great anytime car for someone who is tired of the hassle of parking, fitting in the garage or wants great gas mileage, comfort and the ability to haul a huge amount of stuff in a convenient package. Also has the Aux port for Ipod etc to run sound. Very tight in every way.
Scion xA for Sale
2006 scion xa with extras. 5 speed manual new oem clutch 65k miles clear title(US $6,500.00)
2006 scion xa base 5dr 1.5/a4
2005 scion xa 4dr sdn auto moonroof one owner clean carfax power windows(US $7,251.00)
2006 scion xa base hatchback 5-door 1.5l silver with black interior(US $3,900.00)
2005 scion xa 5-door 1.5l release series 2.0, alpine bluetooth, tint, extras(US $7,250.00)
2006 toyota scion xa hatchback 5-door 1.5l ac 5-spd fully serviced clean xb(US $5,900.00)
Auto Services in Iowa
White`s Automotive ★★★★★
Smart Honda ★★★★★
Route 3 Tire ★★★★★
Precision Repair ★★★★★
Northwest CARSTAR Auto Body Repair Experts ★★★★★
Napa Auto Parts - Genuine Parts Company ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford, Toyota clean up in Best Car For The Money Awards
Fri, 22 Feb 2013The U.S. News Best Cars for the Money Awards picks winners by looking at the average transaction price, five-year total cost of ownership, the regard a car has from the automotive press, reliability figures from J.D. Power and Associates and safety data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The result, according to the magazine, is "the best combination of critical acclaim and long-term value."
Ford nabbed six of the 21 categories that received awards this year, the Focus, Fusion, Fusion Hybrid, Taurus, Escape and Edge getting trophies. Toyota and its Lexus and Scion sub-brands took another five, the Tacoma and Tundra owning the two categories given to pickup trucks. The other ten awards were split between Honda with three, Buick with two, and one each for Subaru, BMW, Hyundai, Chevrolet and Mazda.
Follow the link to see all the winners and read about why they were chosen.
Scion was slain by Toyota, not the Great Recession
Wed, Feb 3 2016Scion didn't have to go down like this. Through the magic of hindsight and hubris, it's easier to see what went wrong. And what might have been. What the industry should understand is this: Scion wasn't a losing proposition from the get-go. Its death is due to negligence and apathy. This is more than just the failure of a sub-brand. It's the failure of a company to deliver new and compelling products over an extended period of time. Toyota will point to the Great Recession as the reason it hedged its bets and withdrew funding for new vehicles, instead of using that as an opportunity to redouble efforts. This was as good as a death warrant, although myopically no one realized it at the time. Sadly, GM's Saturn experiment was a road map for this exact form of failure. No one at Toyota seemed to think the Saturn experience was worth protecting their experimental brand from. Or they weren't heard. Brands live and die on product. Somehow, Scion convinced itself that its real success metric was a youthful demographic of buyers. It seems like this was used to gauge the overall health of the brand. Look at the aging and uncompetitive tC, which Scion proudly noted had a 29-year-old average buyer. That fails to take into account its lack of curb appeal and flagging sales. Who cares if the declining number of people buying your cars are younger? Toyota is going to kill the tC thirteen years [And two indifferent generations ... - Ed.] after it was introduced. In that time, Honda has come out with three entirely new generations of the Civic. Scion wasn't a losing proposition from the get-go. Its death is due to negligence and apathy. At launch, the brand could have gone a few different ways. The xB was plucky, interesting, and useful – a tough mix of ephemeral characteristics – but the xA didn't offer much except a thin veneer of self-consciously applied attitude. That's ok; it was cute. Enter the tC, which managed to combine sporty pretensions with decent cost. It took on the Civic Coupe in the contest for coolness, and usually managed to win. More importantly, an explicit brand value early on was a desire to avoid second generations of any of its models, promising a continually evolving and fresh lineup. At this point, the road splits. Down one lane lies the Scion that could have been. After a short but reasonable product lifecycle, it would have renewed the entire lineup.
2016 Scion iM Review [w/video]
Fri, Aug 7 2015Scion is all grown up. When the brand launched in 2003, it was as if Scion wanted to be the anti-Toyota. You could almost imagine it saying, "We aren't our parents, dude. We're different." Scion's decision to eschew mainstream vehicles was largely successful. The original xA, xB, and tC were affordable, economical, stylish, and – most importantly – different. But the brand's aging lineup couldn't keep the interest of the young, urban buyers it so coveted. Sales suffered severely after the 2009 industry collapse and have failed to return to their 2006 peak. So much like the bearded 20-something that's finally realized an artisanal headcheese startup isn't going to pay the bills, Scion has finally introduced its first truly mainstream model, the 2016 iM. You already know the basics on the iM, courtesy of Managing Editor Steven Ewing's testing in California in June. But since there's little substitute for more mileage and extra time with the car, we ventured out to Michigan's second largest city, Grand Rapids, for a second look. The iM is exactly the kind of vehicle Scion needs right now. Ewing spent most of his time on California's beautiful winding roads, but our second go in the iM was much more sedate, consisting largely of freeway cruising and some city driving. In short, these miles backed up our original assessment: the iM is exactly the kind of vehicle Scion needs right now. But that's not without a few problems. We spent almost all of our drive time behind the wheel of the continuously variable transmission model which, in many ways is better than the six-speed manual-equipped car we originally tested. Toyota's CVT works well; it's on par with the industry's best. The transmission keeps the revs low and responds quickly to throttle inputs, but at the same time, the tach needle is quick to retreat when acceleration isn't demanded. The stepped nature of the CVT is a bit off-putting at first – it feels a lot more sudden on the "upshifts" – but it's easy to ignore. Weirdly, there are no paddle shifters, but you can still pick your "gears" via the floor-mounted shifter. The iM doesn't hate a little bit of fun. We played with the CVT's sport setting, and while we wouldn't recommend using it on a regular basis, we liked the way it kicked up the revs upon corner entry. The engine never felt flat-footed midway through a turn, giving the impression that the iM doesn't hate a little bit of fun.









