2001 Porsche Panamera 4 on 2040-cars
Berlin, Connecticut, United States
Stunning in midnight blue on gray supple leather! One owner clean Carfax, impeccable condition throughout. Serviced at Danbury Porsche from day one, and is completely up to date with 60 mile service done! Includes both keys (keyless go), books, records, AWD, Navigation, and back up cam! Fully loaded version! This Porsches is as close to flawless as it gets. The Porsche combination of elegance and performance is a must see! Warrantied with financing available if qualified before auctions end. We are willing to have pre-purchase inspection preformed before auctions end. This car runs and drives as new and is as close to a flawless example that exists! We will take trade-ins if seen before end of auction. This vehicle qualifies for a extended warranty at additional cost. Please call with questions or payment options 860-202-3400 Gary
|
Porsche Panamera for Sale
One owner cpo panamera hybrid(US $79,888.00)
2011 4s used 4.8l v8 32v automatic hatchback bose premium(US $56,995.00)
2013 porsche panamera s hybrid 22" wheels(US $79,800.00)
18k mls!** porsche cert!** bose/r-camera/lane change assist/r-camera/full lthr(US $98,990.00)
26k 1-owner mls!** porsche cert!** pdcc/bose/xm/r-camera/full lthr** $129k msrp!(US $96,990.00)
2011 porsche panamera 4dr hb power mirrors tire pressure monitor
Auto Services in Connecticut
Valenti Motors Inc ★★★★★
Tires Plus Wheels ★★★★★
Story Brothers Inc ★★★★★
South Valley Auto ★★★★★
People`s Auto LLC ★★★★★
Pandolfe`s Auto Parts ★★★★★
Auto blog
2013 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S
Fri, 19 Jul 2013I don't care who you are; when a new Porsche 911 rolls up in your driveway, that's a pretty good day. This was my very first experience with Porsche's 991 911, and after having spent time with just about every tune and trim of the last car, I was hotly anticipating comparing and contrasting.
Somehow (I don't remember sending out any cash-filled, unmarked envelopes) I'd scored a week in the 911 Carrera 4S over a long holiday weekend, too. That meant that I'd get to A) log a ton of miles in one of the best cars in the world, B) get to show-off the Porsche to family and friends and C) tempt cops in three states to pull me over. Good thing I've got the Autoblog traffic lawyer on speed dial...
Driving Notes
Infiniti cribs new US boss from Porsche
Mon, 19 Aug 2013Just weeks before he was supposed to become CEO of Porsche Cars Australia, Infiniti has apparently offered Porsche COO and Executive Vice President Michael Bartsch a deal he couldn't refuse. Thus, Bartsch has join the company as Vice President of Infiniti Americas, the luxury marque's top North American post. Bartsch replaces Ben Poore, who has been with the automaker since 2008, having led both a 22-percent sales surge in 2012 and the brand's current sales slough, Automotive News reports.
Bartsch, Porsche's No. 2 US executive, has held the COO and Executive Vice President positions at Porsche since 2005 and was scheduled to become CEO of Porsche's Oz division on September 1. Infiniti has experienced a number of recent personnel changes in the past week: it named Vincent Gillet, formerly an executive for Starwood Hotels & Resorts, to lead its marketing efforts worldwide and Simon Cox, a former designer for automakers including Ford and Peugeot, to head a new design studio in London.
Poore reportedly will pursue other interests outside of the auto industry. Read more about the personnel change in the press release below.
Roger Rodas' widow suing Porsche over Carrera GT crash
Tue, 13 May 2014
Investigations undertaken by local law enforcement may have vindicated Porsche from any wrongdoing in the crash that killed actor Paul Walker and racing driver Roger Rodas last year, but the latter's widow is apparently not convinced. According to emerging reports, Kristine Rodas has filed a lawsuit seeking unspecified damages from Porsche Cars North America.
In her suit filed with the Los Angeles Superior Court, Rodas' attorney Mark Geragos reportedly disputes the findings of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, which asserted that the vehicle was traveling at an unsafe speed of 90 miles per hour on city streets, identifying the speed as the cause of the accident. Instead the lawsuit claims that the vehicle was only going 55 mph and that the cause of the crash was improper equipment - namely a faulty right rear suspension and the lack of a crash cage and proper fuel tank.