Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Pontiac Solstice Base Convertible 2-door 2.4l, Deep Blue, One Owner on 2040-cars

US $12,500.00
Year:2006 Mileage:66331 Color: Blue /
 Black
Location:

Mandeville, Louisiana, United States

Mandeville, Louisiana, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
Engine:2.4L 2384CC 145Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1g2mb33b96y110277 Year: 2006
Make: Pontiac
Model: Solstice
Trim: Base Convertible 2-Door
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2
Mileage: 66,331
Options: CD Player, Convertible
Exterior Color: Blue
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Interior Color: Black
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Number of Cylinders: 4
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This little roadster was purchased brand new by me thru eBay motors in Atlanta. I flew there and drove her home!  I need to sell her now because my "bad hip" hurts when clutching...My hubby is a big guy and has trouble getting in and out of her, but we still love to take her for the occasional spin!  There was a front end accident with minor damage that was expertly repaired.

The tires have over 75% of tread to go as they have been replaced.  She has a new battery, a recent comprehensive tune-up and has been serviced at prescribed intervals. She likes premium gasoline, gets 23-28 mpg. There are the expected dings from discourteous people who opened their doors on her, but none deeper than paint and no rust. The cup holder by the passenger's knee is broken. There are two small blemishes in the interior from a drunk guy who was smoking. So, the car has been smoked in, but not for at least 3 years and there is NO trace of odor of any kind.

The engine compartment is clean. The canvas top is fully (manually) operational and in excellent condition. There are no cracks in any of the plastic or the rubber. I gave her spa treatments!

 

Auto Services in Louisiana

Uptown Imports Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2923 Tchoupitoulas St, Gretna
Phone: (504) 891-5068

Twin City Tires ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Auto Transmission
Address: 700 Stella ST, Swartz
Phone: (318) 512-4160

Spires Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 2027 Old Natchitoches Rd, Swartz
Phone: (318) 361-5115

Pumpellys Tire Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1500 Ruth St, Vinton
Phone: (337) 527-6355

Parker`s Automotive & Towing Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: Frierson
Phone: (318) 741-3191

Mr Fixits ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair, Auto Transmission
Address: 213 W Cornerview St, Sorrento
Phone: (225) 647-4417

Auto blog

Baseball team to dress like Trans Am, complete with screaming chicken

Fri, Feb 8 2019

Come to think of it, the Screaming Chicken actually sounds like the name of a minor league baseball team. Well, it isn't, but the famous logo of the same name that graced the hood of the 1970s Pontiac Trans Am will at least be making it to a baseball uniform this summer. The Lansing Lugnuts, a Single-A affiliate of the Toronto Blue Jays, will be rocking these special uniforms to honor the late Burt Reynolds and his film Smokey and the Bandit. By default, it will also be honoring the car the movie made famous: the 1977 Trans Am painted black with gold trim and, of course, the screaming chicken on the hood. This is a pretty good history of the emblem. So why the Lugnuts and Burt Reynolds? Although he claimed to be born in Georgia for much of his career, he admitted in a 2015 autobiography that he was in fact born in Lansing, Mich. After a few years, his family settled in Florida. Not exactly hometown hero stuff, but minor league baseball promotions have been made of more tenuous connections. The Burt Reynolds tribute night will be July 20, and if you want to get a screaming chicken jersey for yourself (I mean, wouldn't they be perfect for a cars and coffee?), the game-used jerseys will be auctioned off for charity after the game.

This or That: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 vs. 1984 Pontiac Fiero

Tue, Feb 10 2015

Welcome to another round of This or That, where two Autoblog editors pick a topic, pick a side and pull no punches. Last round pitted yours truly against Associate Editor Brandon Turkus, and my chosen VW Vanagon Syncro narrowly defeated Brandon's 1987 Land Rover. In fact, it was, by far, the closest round we've seen, with 1,907 voters seeing things my way (for 50.8 percent of the vote) versus 1,848 votes for Brandon's Rover (49.2 percent). Sweet, sweet victory! For this latest round of This or That, I've roped Editor Greg Migliore into what I think is a rather fun debate. We've each chosen our favorite terrible cars, setting a price limit of $10,000 to make sure neither of us went too crazy with our automotive atrocities. I think we've both chosen terribly... and I mean that in the best way possible. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 Jeremy Korzeniewski: Why It's Terrible: Taken in isolation, the Chrysler Crossfire isn't necessarily a terrible car. In fact, it drives pretty darn well, and there's a lot of solid engineering under its slinky shape. Problem is, that engineering was already rather long in the tooth well before Chrysler ever got its hands on it, having come from Mercedes-Benz, which used the basic chassis and drivetrain in a previous version of its SLK coupe and roadster. Granted, the SLK was an okay car, too, but even when new, it hardly set the world on fire with sporty driving dynamics. Chrysler took these decent-but-no-more bits and pieces from the Mercedes parts bin – remember, this car was conceived in the disastrous Merger Of Equals days – and covered them with a rather attractive hard-candy shell. Unfortunately, the super sporty shape wrote checks in the minds of buyers that its well-worn mechanicals were simply unable to cash, though an injection of power courtesy of a supercharged V6 engine in the SRT6 model, as seen here, certainly helped ease some of those woes. In the end, Chrysler was left with a so-called halo car that looked the part but never quite performed the part. It was almost universally panned by critics as an overpriced parts-bin special, which, I must add, was damningly accurate. As a result, sales were very slow, and within the first few months, dealers were clearancing the car at cut-rate prices, just to keep them from taking up too much of the showroom floor. Why It's Not That Terrible, After All: I can speak from personal experience when discussing the Chrysler Crossfire. You see, I owned one. Well, sort of...

What car brand should come back?

Fri, Apr 7 2017

Congratulations, wishful thinker! You've been granted one wish by the automotive genie or wizard or leprechaun or whoever has been gifted with that magical ability. You get to pick one expired, retired or fired automotive brand and resurrect it from its heavenly peace! But which one? That's a tough decision and not one to be made lightly. As we know from car history, the landscape is littered with failed brands that just didn't have what it took to cut it in the dog-eat-dog world of vehicle design, engineering and marketing. So many to choose from! Because I am not a car historian, I'll leave it to a real expert to present a complete list of history's automotive misses from which you can choose, if you're a stickler about that sort of thing. And since I'm most familiar with post-World War II cars and brands, that's what I'm going to stick to (although Maxwell, Cord and some others could make strong arguments). So, with the parameters established, let's get started, shall we? Hudson: I admit, I really don't know a lot about Hudson, except that stock car drivers apparently did pretty well with them back in the day, and Paul Newman played one in the first Cars movie. But really, isn't that enough to warrant consideration? Frankly, I think the Paul Newman connection is reason enough. What other actor who drove race cars was cooler? James Dean? Steve McQueen? James Garner? Paul Walker? But, I digress. That's a story for another day. Plymouth: As the scion of a Dodge family (my grandfather had a Dodge truck, and my mom had not one, but two Dodge Darts – the rear-wheel-drive ones with slant sixes in them, not the other one they don't make any more), I tend to think of Plymouth as the "poor man's Dodge." But then you have to consider the many Hemi-powered muscle cars sold under the Plymouth brand, such as the Road Runner, the GTX, the Barracuda, and so on. Was there a more affordable muscle car than Plymouth? When you place it in the context of "affordable muscle," Plymouth makes a pretty strong argument for reanimation. Oldsmobile: When I was a teenager, all the cool kids had Oldsmobile Cutlasses, the downsized ones that came out in 1978. At one point, the Olds Cutlass was the hottest selling car in the land, if you can believe that. Then everybody started buying Honda Civics and Accords and Toyota Corollas and Camrys, and you know the rest. But going back farther, there's the 442 – perhaps Olds' finest hour when it came to muscle cars.