Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1966 Pontiac Gto Project Car Classic Car Hot Rod Muscle Car on 2040-cars

US $16,800.00
Year:1966 Mileage:0 Color: Blue /
 Black
Location:

Rossville, Georgia, United States

Rossville, Georgia, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Coupe
Engine:V-8-389
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 242176B133192 Year: 1966
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Pontiac
Model: GTO
Trim: 2 DOOR
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: AUTOMATIC
Power Options: Power Windows
Mileage: 0
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Black
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

FOR SALE IS MY 66 GTO MATCH # 389 TRI POWER! HAVE ALL PHS DOC'S TO BACK THIS UP ! OTHER OP'S ARE POWER WINDOWS, POWER TRUNK ,POWER BRAKES AND REAR DEFOG. I BOUGHT THIS CAR FROM MAC'S RESTORATIONS IN ATL GA WHO HAS HAD IT FOR THE PAST 12 YEARS ALL WORK HAS BEEN DONE IN HIS SHOP LOOKS GOOD! IT WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF FULL RESTO, FRAME HAD BEEN BLASTED AND PAINTED ALL NEW FRAME MOUNTS AND BUSHINGS ALL NEW FRONT END TIE RODS, BALL JOINTS, AS YOU CAN SEE FRONT END WAS TAKEN OFF AND PAINTED ORIG BLUE ALL WINDOWS WORK AND GLASS IS IN GOOD CONDITION. MOTOR WAS REBUILT, CARB'S ARE NEW, GAS TANK HAS BEEN BOILED OUT NEW SENDING UNIT, NEEDS GAS LINE FROM TANK TO CARB WE STARTED IT WHEN I BOUGHT IT SOUNDS GREAT! CAN'T BE DRIVEN BECAUSE OF GAS LINE! HAS A TORBO 350 IN IT NOW BUT ALSO COMES WITH ORIG REBUILT POWER GLIDE REAR END IS 10 BOLT POSIE. BUMPERS FRONT AND REAR ARE NEW.THERE JUST BOLTED ON, FOR TRANSPORT EVERY THING IS HERE FOR THIS CAR. EVEN NEW DASH PAD STILL IN THE BOX. EXHUHST LOOKS TO BE NEW I HAVE ORIG MANIFOLDS. I WOULD LOVE TO FINISH THIS PROJECT BUT I'M PRESSED FOR THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL= MONEY= I WILL TRY AND POST PHS DOC'S TO SHOW IT'S ORIG TRI POWERED AT THIS POINT ALL THE NEEDS IS BLOCKED OUT AND PAINTED NEW TIRES I WILL GIVE THE HIGH BIDDER EVERYTHING I GOT WITH THE CAR. EVEN T

Auto Services in Georgia

Young`s Upholstery & Seat Covers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 104 Temple Ave, Newnan
Phone: (770) 251-0310

Vic Williams Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 441 Butler Industrial Dr, Dallas
Phone: (770) 445-4645

United Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 4746 Atlanta Hwy, Gainesville
Phone: (770) 967-8333

Unique Auto App ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 5717 Peachtree Industrial Blvd, Scottdale
Phone: (770) 936-3070

Ultimate Benz Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 6938 Chapman Rd, Lithonia
Phone: (770) 484-7550

Transmission For Less.Com ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission Parts
Address: 1880 Buford Hwy, Duluth
Phone: (770) 205-9222

Auto blog

What car brand should come back?

Fri, Apr 7 2017

Congratulations, wishful thinker! You've been granted one wish by the automotive genie or wizard or leprechaun or whoever has been gifted with that magical ability. You get to pick one expired, retired or fired automotive brand and resurrect it from its heavenly peace! But which one? That's a tough decision and not one to be made lightly. As we know from car history, the landscape is littered with failed brands that just didn't have what it took to cut it in the dog-eat-dog world of vehicle design, engineering and marketing. So many to choose from! Because I am not a car historian, I'll leave it to a real expert to present a complete list of history's automotive misses from which you can choose, if you're a stickler about that sort of thing. And since I'm most familiar with post-World War II cars and brands, that's what I'm going to stick to (although Maxwell, Cord and some others could make strong arguments). So, with the parameters established, let's get started, shall we? Hudson: I admit, I really don't know a lot about Hudson, except that stock car drivers apparently did pretty well with them back in the day, and Paul Newman played one in the first Cars movie. But really, isn't that enough to warrant consideration? Frankly, I think the Paul Newman connection is reason enough. What other actor who drove race cars was cooler? James Dean? Steve McQueen? James Garner? Paul Walker? But, I digress. That's a story for another day. Plymouth: As the scion of a Dodge family (my grandfather had a Dodge truck, and my mom had not one, but two Dodge Darts – the rear-wheel-drive ones with slant sixes in them, not the other one they don't make any more), I tend to think of Plymouth as the "poor man's Dodge." But then you have to consider the many Hemi-powered muscle cars sold under the Plymouth brand, such as the Road Runner, the GTX, the Barracuda, and so on. Was there a more affordable muscle car than Plymouth? When you place it in the context of "affordable muscle," Plymouth makes a pretty strong argument for reanimation. Oldsmobile: When I was a teenager, all the cool kids had Oldsmobile Cutlasses, the downsized ones that came out in 1978. At one point, the Olds Cutlass was the hottest selling car in the land, if you can believe that. Then everybody started buying Honda Civics and Accords and Toyota Corollas and Camrys, and you know the rest. But going back farther, there's the 442 – perhaps Olds' finest hour when it came to muscle cars.

This or That: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 vs. 1984 Pontiac Fiero

Tue, Feb 10 2015

Welcome to another round of This or That, where two Autoblog editors pick a topic, pick a side and pull no punches. Last round pitted yours truly against Associate Editor Brandon Turkus, and my chosen VW Vanagon Syncro narrowly defeated Brandon's 1987 Land Rover. In fact, it was, by far, the closest round we've seen, with 1,907 voters seeing things my way (for 50.8 percent of the vote) versus 1,848 votes for Brandon's Rover (49.2 percent). Sweet, sweet victory! For this latest round of This or That, I've roped Editor Greg Migliore into what I think is a rather fun debate. We've each chosen our favorite terrible cars, setting a price limit of $10,000 to make sure neither of us went too crazy with our automotive atrocities. I think we've both chosen terribly... and I mean that in the best way possible. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 Jeremy Korzeniewski: Why It's Terrible: Taken in isolation, the Chrysler Crossfire isn't necessarily a terrible car. In fact, it drives pretty darn well, and there's a lot of solid engineering under its slinky shape. Problem is, that engineering was already rather long in the tooth well before Chrysler ever got its hands on it, having come from Mercedes-Benz, which used the basic chassis and drivetrain in a previous version of its SLK coupe and roadster. Granted, the SLK was an okay car, too, but even when new, it hardly set the world on fire with sporty driving dynamics. Chrysler took these decent-but-no-more bits and pieces from the Mercedes parts bin – remember, this car was conceived in the disastrous Merger Of Equals days – and covered them with a rather attractive hard-candy shell. Unfortunately, the super sporty shape wrote checks in the minds of buyers that its well-worn mechanicals were simply unable to cash, though an injection of power courtesy of a supercharged V6 engine in the SRT6 model, as seen here, certainly helped ease some of those woes. In the end, Chrysler was left with a so-called halo car that looked the part but never quite performed the part. It was almost universally panned by critics as an overpriced parts-bin special, which, I must add, was damningly accurate. As a result, sales were very slow, and within the first few months, dealers were clearancing the car at cut-rate prices, just to keep them from taking up too much of the showroom floor. Why It's Not That Terrible, After All: I can speak from personal experience when discussing the Chrysler Crossfire. You see, I owned one. Well, sort of...

6 car mashups that God never intended

Sat, May 17 2014

In the 2000s, the musical mashup genre saw a peak of popularity with releases like The Grey Album from Danger Mouse that mixed The Beatles and Jay-Z. UK artist James Pursey from Carwow decided to take the same concept of shoehorning two disparate things together but applied the concept to cars. Your opinion on the results will vary with your sense of humor. These creations are either some funny pieces of abstract art or absolute monstrosities that prove good design should be left alone. Likely the best of the bunch is the Lambotomic (pictured above), which combines a Lamborghini Miura and an Ariel Atom. Granted, the Ariel is little more than a skeleton to begin with, and the outcome looks like a slightly stretched Atom with the new nose and tail from one of the most beautiful vehicles ever. This could actually work. Though, not all of the mashups are quite so pleasant. The Porschiac WW RS (pictured right) is absolutely disgusting. It combines a Pontiac Aztek, which isn't a beauty queen to start with, and a Porsche 911 GT3 RS. Obviously, the 911 is an iconic shape in autonobolia, but that can't save it from the horror of the Aztek. Pursey fits the its nose, wheel, wing, roll cage and stripes onto the Pontiac. The outcome: A design that will show up in your nightmares. Check out the gallery for the rest of the mashups, including the Humi (a Humvee and a Mini), Aston Smartin (Aston Martin and Smart), Rangerini (Range Rover and Lamborghini Aventador) and the Mazdafenda (Mazda MX-5 Miata and Land Rover Defender). They might not all be beautiful (or even pretty), but it's fun to imagine these oddball creations actually driving down the road. Featured Gallery Car Mashups News Source: CarwowImage Credit: James Pursey Design/Style Humor Lamborghini Pontiac Porsche ariel atom lamborghini miura pontiac aztek mashup