2002 Fuel Injected Pontiac 2-dr Se Grand Am Only 103,000 Miles on 2040-cars
Ashland, Oregon, United States
|
Pontiac Grand am SE 2-door Coupe, 4-Cylinder, fuel injected, excellent condition only 103,000 miles, well taken care of. New tires, Alignment and battery. Always changed oils and fluids at 3,000 miles. Paint is in excellent condition. Everything works. Drives very nice and has that sporty feeling when you're behind the wheel. If you want a great vehicle this is the one, selling only because owner is moving to Kansas and needs a truck to move items or they would not be selling it. You cannot go wrong with this vehicle, this vehicle is great for young or old. Maintained always by Martins Auto, family owned auto repair business for all makes of cars, they have been established for many, many years in Reno. We have all the records on this vehicle from Martins Auto, we purchased it 8-years ago. You can talk directly to the Martin about the quality of this vehicle. Other features include: Spoiler, Anti-Lock Brakes, Power Windows, Front Wheel Drive, Bucket Seats, and Cruise Control. This vehicle also includes: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Mirrors, CD Single-Disc Player, Cloth Seats, Power Steering, Rear Window Defrost, Remote Trunk Release, Tilt Wheel, Vanity Mirrors, Trip Odometer 25 MPG City - 32.5 MPG Highway, 380 to 395 miles per tank GM's Ecotec 2.2-Liter 4-Cylinder Engine Delivers Excellent Fuel Efficiency and Low Emissions in a Quiet, Reliable, Durable Package. To read more on this motor please go to this website: http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2002/02/07/035471.html Here are a few site of other 2-dr sports for sale. $6499 2002 22,300 miles http://www.2040cars.com/Pontiac/Grand-Am/2001-pontiac-grand-am-se1-coupe-2-door-3-4l-only-22-300-miles-370020/ $4950 2001 180,500 miles http://www.cheapusedcarsbyowner.com/detail/2001-Pontiac-Grand-Am-SE1-for-sale-HeRUCUeeeaRaePzPssH.html $5678 2002 86,845 miles http://www.leandertrucksncars.com/cat_pages/pontiac.shtml $5900 2003 182,592miles http://www.easyautosales.com/used-cars/2003-Pontiac-Grand-Prix-SE-115306704.html Sold |
Pontiac Grand Am for Sale
2003 pontiac gran am(US $3,599.00)
1999 pontiac grand am gt sedan 4-door 3.4l(US $2,500.00)
Pontiac grand am 2001, very good condition for sale, cheap & negotiable(US $2,000.00)
2003 pontiac grand am gt sedan 4-door 3.4l(US $4,300.00)
2002 pontiac grand am se coupe 2-door 2.2l(US $3,700.00)
Auto Services in Oregon
Vic Alfonso Cadillac ★★★★★
T. B`s Oak Park Automotive ★★★★★
Sun Automotive ★★★★★
Seaport Auto Wholesale Inc ★★★★★
Schuck`s Auto Supply ★★★★★
Save On Tires ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM recalling 1.4 million older vehicles for oil leak fire risk
Tue, Oct 27 2015General Motors is recalling 1,411,332 older vehicles with its 3.8-liter V6 yet again due to a fire risk. Specifically, there are 1,283,340 of them in the US, and the affected models are the: 1997-2004 Pontiac Grand Prix 2000-2004 Chevrolet Impala 1998-1999 Chevrolet Lumina 1998-2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 1998-1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue 1997- 2004 Buick Regal The fault with these vehicles is that oil can drip onto the hot exhaust manifold during hard braking, which can potentially cause of fire. In the last six years, there have 19 reported minor injuries from this problem but no crashes or fatalities, according to the company. Spokesperson Alan Adler also told Autoblog: "GM has reports of 1,345 fires in vehicles that were repaired under two previous recalls for this issue." At this time, GM is still developing a remedy for the problem. According to Adler, the company advised owners to park these vehicles outside for the previous recalls. "The cars can be safely driven. In cases where a customer reported an engine fire while driving, smoke was reported, which would be an indication of a malfunction," he said. This is GM's fourth recall for this problem since 2008, according to The Detroit News. At one point it was believed that aging valve cover gaskets allowed the oil to leak out and drip onto the manifold. A campaign in 2009 covered nearly 1.5 million of these models through the 2003 model year for the same issue. At the time, dealers installed new spark plug wire retainers as a fix. Related Video: GM Statement: General Motors is recalling 1,283,340 older sedans and coupes in the U.S. from the 1997 to 2004 model years because drops of oil may be deposited on the hot exhaust manifold through hard braking, which can cause engine compartment fires. GM is working on a remedy. The company is aware of post-repair fires in some vehicles but no crashes or fatalities. There have been 19 reported minor injuries over the last six years. These vehicles with 3.8-liter V6 3800 engines are affected: 1997-2004 Pontiac Grand Prix, 2000-2004 Chevrolet Impala, 1998-1999 Chevrolet Lumina and 1998-2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, 1998-1999 Oldsmobile Intrigue and 1997-2004 Buick Regal. Including Canada, Mexico and exports, the total population is 1,411,332.
GM recalling over 40,000 Chevy, Pontiac and Saturn models over fuel pump woes
Mon, 01 Oct 2012The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has issued a recall for a number of General Motors cars and crossovers bought or currently registered in the hot-climate states of Arkansas, Arizona, California, Nevada, Oklahoma and Texas. As many as 40,859 units consisting of the 2007 Chevrolet Equinox, Pontiac Torrent and Saturn Ion and the 2007-2009 Chevrolet Cobalt (shown) and its Pontiac G5 twin are being recalled for potential fuel leaks.
This recall is being issued due to potentially faulty fuel pump components that can crack and cause gasoline to leak from the return or supply ports and possibly cause a fire. NHTSA has not indicated how many fuel leaks or vehicle fires have been reported. As a fix, GM will replace the fuel pump modules on all affected vehicles free of charge. Since Pontiac and Saturn have been shuttered, owners will be able to go to another GM-brand dealership to have their vehicles repaired.
While the list of affected cars and crossovers varies by state and model year, if you own any of these models and live in Arizona, California, Florida, Nevada, Oklahoma or Texas, be sure to check the official notice below for more details.
This or That: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 vs. 1984 Pontiac Fiero
Tue, Feb 10 2015Welcome to another round of This or That, where two Autoblog editors pick a topic, pick a side and pull no punches. Last round pitted yours truly against Associate Editor Brandon Turkus, and my chosen VW Vanagon Syncro narrowly defeated Brandon's 1987 Land Rover. In fact, it was, by far, the closest round we've seen, with 1,907 voters seeing things my way (for 50.8 percent of the vote) versus 1,848 votes for Brandon's Rover (49.2 percent). Sweet, sweet victory! For this latest round of This or That, I've roped Editor Greg Migliore into what I think is a rather fun debate. We've each chosen our favorite terrible cars, setting a price limit of $10,000 to make sure neither of us went too crazy with our automotive atrocities. I think we've both chosen terribly... and I mean that in the best way possible. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 Jeremy Korzeniewski: Why It's Terrible: Taken in isolation, the Chrysler Crossfire isn't necessarily a terrible car. In fact, it drives pretty darn well, and there's a lot of solid engineering under its slinky shape. Problem is, that engineering was already rather long in the tooth well before Chrysler ever got its hands on it, having come from Mercedes-Benz, which used the basic chassis and drivetrain in a previous version of its SLK coupe and roadster. Granted, the SLK was an okay car, too, but even when new, it hardly set the world on fire with sporty driving dynamics. Chrysler took these decent-but-no-more bits and pieces from the Mercedes parts bin – remember, this car was conceived in the disastrous Merger Of Equals days – and covered them with a rather attractive hard-candy shell. Unfortunately, the super sporty shape wrote checks in the minds of buyers that its well-worn mechanicals were simply unable to cash, though an injection of power courtesy of a supercharged V6 engine in the SRT6 model, as seen here, certainly helped ease some of those woes. In the end, Chrysler was left with a so-called halo car that looked the part but never quite performed the part. It was almost universally panned by critics as an overpriced parts-bin special, which, I must add, was damningly accurate. As a result, sales were very slow, and within the first few months, dealers were clearancing the car at cut-rate prices, just to keep them from taking up too much of the showroom floor. Why It's Not That Terrible, After All: I can speak from personal experience when discussing the Chrysler Crossfire. You see, I owned one. Well, sort of...



