Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1968 Pontiac Gto 4 Speed 400 Ho No Reserve A Awesome Car on 2040-cars

Year:1968 Mileage:12541
Location:

Boulder, Colorado, United States

Boulder, Colorado, United States
Advertising:

This is a 1968 GTO WITH 12,561 miles factory ac and 4 speed matching numbers engine and trans. 

Just painted and other then that very stock besides wheels. 

Dash is cracked and AC needs recharge 

Starts runs and drives like new. 

All new brakes and suspension with less then 500 miles 

Have a ton of extras for her and have both stock and chrome air cleaners as seen in pics there is 0 rust on this car. 



Before bidding call with any questions. 
720-882-4215

    Auto Services in Colorado

    Zarlingo`s Automotive Svc Ctr ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
    Address: 748 Horizon Dr, Loma
    Phone: (970) 242-1691

    Toy Car Care ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
    Address: Black-Hawk
    Phone: (720) 288-0989

    Tony`s Tires & Automotive ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
    Address: 3800 N Garfield Ave, Masonville
    Phone: (970) 667-2435

    Tire Stop ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
    Address: 4727 Broadway St Ste C, Louisville
    Phone: (303) 449-0581

    Rocket Express ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Car Wash
    Address: 13074 W Ida Ave # A1, Indian-Hills
    Phone: (303) 972-3800

    Rio Grande Enterprises, LLC ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Hotels
    Address: 24263 Highway 149, Creede
    Phone: (719) 658-0374

    Auto blog

    This or That: 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 vs. 1984 Pontiac Fiero

    Tue, Feb 10 2015

    Welcome to another round of This or That, where two Autoblog editors pick a topic, pick a side and pull no punches. Last round pitted yours truly against Associate Editor Brandon Turkus, and my chosen VW Vanagon Syncro narrowly defeated Brandon's 1987 Land Rover. In fact, it was, by far, the closest round we've seen, with 1,907 voters seeing things my way (for 50.8 percent of the vote) versus 1,848 votes for Brandon's Rover (49.2 percent). Sweet, sweet victory! For this latest round of This or That, I've roped Editor Greg Migliore into what I think is a rather fun debate. We've each chosen our favorite terrible cars, setting a price limit of $10,000 to make sure neither of us went too crazy with our automotive atrocities. I think we've both chosen terribly... and I mean that in the best way possible. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire SRT6 Jeremy Korzeniewski: Why It's Terrible: Taken in isolation, the Chrysler Crossfire isn't necessarily a terrible car. In fact, it drives pretty darn well, and there's a lot of solid engineering under its slinky shape. Problem is, that engineering was already rather long in the tooth well before Chrysler ever got its hands on it, having come from Mercedes-Benz, which used the basic chassis and drivetrain in a previous version of its SLK coupe and roadster. Granted, the SLK was an okay car, too, but even when new, it hardly set the world on fire with sporty driving dynamics. Chrysler took these decent-but-no-more bits and pieces from the Mercedes parts bin – remember, this car was conceived in the disastrous Merger Of Equals days – and covered them with a rather attractive hard-candy shell. Unfortunately, the super sporty shape wrote checks in the minds of buyers that its well-worn mechanicals were simply unable to cash, though an injection of power courtesy of a supercharged V6 engine in the SRT6 model, as seen here, certainly helped ease some of those woes. In the end, Chrysler was left with a so-called halo car that looked the part but never quite performed the part. It was almost universally panned by critics as an overpriced parts-bin special, which, I must add, was damningly accurate. As a result, sales were very slow, and within the first few months, dealers were clearancing the car at cut-rate prices, just to keep them from taking up too much of the showroom floor. Why It's Not That Terrible, After All: I can speak from personal experience when discussing the Chrysler Crossfire. You see, I owned one. Well, sort of...

    GM recalling 426,000 sedans over faulty transmission shift cable

    Fri, 21 Sep 2012

    General Motors is recalling some 426,240 sedans that may have a faulty transmission shift cable, according to a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration report this morning. The recall concerns a fault within four-speed automatic transmissions equipped on 2007-2010 Saturn Aura models, and 2008-2010 Chevrolet Malibu and Pontiac G6 models.
    The report specifies that tabs on the transmission shift cable may fracture and separate. Such a fault could cause a discrepancy between the actual position of the transmission and the apparent position of the shift lever.
    GM is currently working to notify owners of the vehicles in question, and dealers will check and replace shift cables free of charge. Scroll down to read the complete NHTSA report.

    Airbag recall adds 85k Pontiac Vibes to tally

    Fri, 13 Jun 2014

    The repairs needed for the faulty airbag inflators supplied by Takata continue to expand. Toyota initially announced a recall of 766,300 vehicles equipped with the bad part on June 11 as a followup to a campaign from 2013. Soon after, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened a preliminary evaluation into five automakers who also used the component in their models. Now, NHTSA has released the official announcement of the latest Toyota recall listing 844,277 affected cars, including the newly added 2003-2004 Pontiac Vibe.
    While NHTSA's document didn't include a model-by-model breakdown, General Motors spokesperson Alan Adler estimated to Autoblog that roughly 85,000 Vibes in the US would be covered under the latest recall. Like the rest of the affected models, the airbag inflator could rupture in a crash causing the bag not to work correctly, possibly spraying metal fragments at the occupant.
    Toyota spokesperson Cindy Knight told Autoblog that the reason for the disparity between the earlier press release and NHTSA document was that Toyota was continuing to comb through VINs to create a list of affected vehicles. The original number was an estimate of that process at the time. Scroll down to the recall report from NHTSA.