1997 Nissan Quest Gxe Mini Passenger Van 3-door 3.0l on 2040-cars
Olive Branch, Mississippi, United States
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L 2960CC 181Cu. In. V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Nissan
Model: Quest
Trim: GXE Mini Passenger Van 3-Door
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 167,171
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: GXE
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Gray
I purchased this van to drive around with and I do not need another car so I am offering it to someone looking for an older and reliable car. The van looks good, starts well, runs well, drive well, stops well with no problems at all. It runs pretty good considering it’s age. This van would make a great work van, daily transportation van, and weekend worker. These vans are known for their longevity and are known to run well for over 250,000 miles. For a 19 year old vehicle you will be impressed with this van and it is fun to drive and different. The Only problem with the van is the dent on the front bumper that happen because someone back up when the van was park at work. The other problem is the front windshield on the front has a couple crack but that easily replaced for a cheap price.
Upon purchasing the vehicle the following have been professionally performed since the van had sat around for a while: New Battery, New oil pan (old one looked rusty), gasket and fresh oil change. New Wipers front and back, 2 brand new 17,000-mile tires and a red front rear bumper. The transmission has been fully serviced with new filter, synthetic fluid and front seal (the old one was dried out somewhat). The van performs very well and I have occasionally been driving it 7 miles each way back and forth to work. The engine runs strong and the transmission shifts smoothly, as would be expected from a vehicle with 167,171 miles. Well good luck on the bid and if y'all have any question feel free to text or call me 662-306-0034. (I rather you text first before y'all call me because i don't answer unknown phone numbers)
Nissan Quest for Sale
- 2007 nissan quest s fwd cdchanger powerliftgate 3rdrow we finance!!(US $8,940.00)
- Nissan quest mini van dvd no reserve clean low miles power everything seats 8!!
- 2007 nissan quest(US $10,600.00)
- 2000 nissan quest red low miles loaded well maintained
- Nissan quest 2007 charcoal grey 81,625 smoke free pet free great condition(US $9,200.00)
- No reserve runs great cold a/c nissan quest
Auto Services in Mississippi
Wise Choice Audio ★★★★★
Vantage Auto ★★★★★
Petro Nissan ★★★★★
Personal Touch Bodywerks ★★★★★
Performance Window Tinting ★★★★★
Novelty Machine Works ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Nissan Leaf EVs recalled for missing welds
Mon, May 19 2014The Nissan Leaf has been recalled before, for problems with the passenger-side airbags. Early models of the car has also had start-up issues, but those did not lead to a recall. Today, we're learning about another problem with the world's most popular electric vehicle. In April, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a recall of a small number of 2014 model year Leaf EVs - just 211 units that were made between February 28 and March 12 of this year – and reminded the world about it this morning with a Tweet. The problem, NHTSA says, is that, "the front structural member assembly may be missing welds," and that means that the car's structural integrity could be compromised in a crash. You don't say. Starting in the middle of June, Nissan will look at the vehicles that could be missing welds and offer replacements for free. If you have a potentially affected vehicle, Nissan should be contacting you soon, or you can call the automaker at the number listed below. Report Receipt Date: APR 16, 2014 NHTSA Campaign Number: 14V192000 Component(s): Potential Number of Units Affected: 211 Manufacturer: Nissan North America, Inc. SUMMARY: Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2014 LEAF vehicles manufactured February 28, 2014, through March 12, 2014. The front structural member assembly may be missing welds, which could reduce the structural integrity of the vehicle if the vehicle is involved in a crash. As such, these vehicles fail to meet the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 208, "Occupant Crash Protection," and 305, "Electric-Powered Vehicles: Electrolyte Spillage and Electrical Shock Protection." CONSEQUENCE: Missing welds may effect the vehicle's integrity in the event of a crash, increasing the risk of injury to the vehicle's occupants. REMEDY: Nissan will notify owners, and dealers will inspect to see if any of the welds are missing. Any vehicle missing welds will be replaced, free of charge. The recall is expected to begin by mid-June 2014. Owners may contact Nissan at 1-800-647-7261. NOTES: Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov.
2015 Nissan Murano is the Sport Sedan Concept of crossovers [w/video]
Wed, 16 Apr 2014The edgy new Nissan Murano has just been officially unveiled at today's New York Auto Show following its online debut earlier this week. Wearing sheetmetal clearly inspired by the Japanese brand's creatively named Sport Sedan Concept, the third-generation Murano continues the tradition of offering dramatic styling and surprisingly premium interiors.
With headlights and a grille that look lifted from the Detroit Auto Show concept, the Murano arguably has more design presence than it's ever had before, thanks to its sharply styled headlights and in-your-face grille. The profile is highlighted by an aggressive kink in the beltline behind the C-pillar, while the rear of the crossover sports a smallish rear window and strongly styled C-shaped taillights.
The redesigned interior isn't quite as dramatic a departure as the exterior, with a layout reminiscent of the larger Pathfinder. The material quality, though, looks to be significantly improved for 2015. There are also no shortage of optional, upmarket interior items, like heated and cooled front seats, a heated rear bench and an upsized panoramic sunroof.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.