2013 Nissan Nv3500 V8 Silver Loaded Up With Tech/tow Sv Highroof on 2040-cars
Houston, Texas, United States
Body Type:Minivan, Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:V8
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Nissan
Model: NV
Trim: 3500 SV V8 Tech/Tow
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Drive Type: Rear Wheel Drive
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 6
Sub Model: V-8 Highroof
Exterior Color: Silver
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray
YOU ARE VIEWING A BRAND NEW 2013 NISSAN NV3500 SV V8 Highroof. Fully Loaded with Tech and Tow Package
Included Packages
Technology Package ($950) |
---|
|
Tow Package ($460) |
|
Rear Door Glass Package ($190) |
|
Additional Options
|
Convenience Features
1-touch down | |
---|---|
Tilt steering wheel | |
Power windows | |
Air conditioning | |
Passenger door bin | |
Overhead console |
Front beverage holders | |
---|---|
Remote keyless entry | |
Illuminated entry | |
Speed control | |
Driver door bin | |
Navigation system |
Off-Road Capability
Ground clearance (min) | 206mm (8.1") |
---|---|
Approach angle | 18 deg |
Departure angle | 17 deg |
Ramp breakover angle | 16 deg |
Entertainment Features
Radio data system | |
---|---|
Wireless phone connectivity | Bluetooth |
MP3 decoder | |
AM/FM radio | SiriusXM |
1st row LCD monitors | 1 |
Speakers | 4 |
Steering wheel mounted audio controls | |
CD player |
Warranty
Basic warranty | 36 months/36,000miles |
---|---|
Roadside assistance coverage | 60 months/60,000miles |
Corrosion perforation warranty | 60 months/ unlimited distance |
Powertrain warranty | 60 months/60,000miles |
Seats and Trim
Max seating capacity | 2 |
---|---|
Front seats | bucket |
Front center armrest | |
Power driver seat |
Body Exterior
Door mirrors | chrome |
---|---|
Trailer hitch receiver | |
Rear cargo | split swing-out |
Power door mirrors | |
Bumpers | chrome |
Heated door mirrors |
Specs and Dimensions
Compression ratio | 9.80 to 1 |
---|---|
Engine horsepower | 317hp @ 5,200RPM |
Front headroom | 1,615mm (63.6") |
Payload | 1,625kg (3,583lbs) |
Passenger volume | 2,874L (101.5 cu.ft.) |
Turning radius | 6.9m (22.6') |
Exterior height | 2,687mm (105.8") |
Curb weight | 2,786kg (6,143lbs) |
Front shoulder room | 1,669mm (65.7") |
Exterior body width | 2,029mm (79.9") |
Wheelbase | 3,711mm (146.1") |
---|---|
Towing capacity | 4,309kg (9,500lbs) |
Engine bore x stroke | 98.0mm x 92.0mm (3.86" x 3.62") |
Interior maximum cargo volume | 9,149 L (323 cu.ft.) |
Front legroom | 1,067mm (42.0") |
Engine displacement | 5.6 L |
Exterior length | 6,111mm (240.6") |
Engine torque | 385 lb.-ft. @ 3,400RPM |
Interior cargo volume | 9,149 L (323 cu.ft.) |
GVWR | 4,491kg (9,900lbs) |
Front hiproom | 1,539mm (60.6") |
Powertrain
Mode select transmission | |
---|---|
Horsepower | 317hp @ 5,200RPM |
Variable valve control | |
Transmission | 5 speed automatic |
Engine liters | 5.6 |
Sequential multi-point fuel injection | |
Fuel tank capacity | 28.0gal. |
Cylinder configuration | V-8 |
---|---|
Engine location | front |
Recommended fuel | regular unleaded |
Torque | 385 lb.-ft. @ 3,400RPM |
Number of valves | 32 |
Drive type | rear-wheel |
Limited slip differential |
Safety and Security
Traction control | |
---|---|
Brake assist | |
Electronic stability | |
ABS brakes | |
Security system |
Dual front side impact airbags | |
---|---|
4 wheel disc brakes | |
Panic alarm | |
Overhead airbag | |
Ignition disable | |
Dual front impact airbags |
Suspension/Handling
Front tires | 245/75SR17.0E |
---|---|
Rear tires | 245/75SR17.0E |
Wheel size | 17" |
Speed-sensing steering |
Single rear wheels | |
---|---|
Rear anti-roll bar | |
Front wheel independent suspension | |
Power steering | |
Front anti-roll bar |
Lighting, Visibility and Instrumentation
Outside temperature display | |
---|---|
Tachometer | |
Trip computer | |
Front reading lights | |
Variably intermittent wipers |
Parking sensors | rear with camera |
---|---|
Rear window defroster | |
Low tire pressure warning | |
Voltmeter | |
Speed sensitive wipers |
Nissan NV for Sale
- 2013 nissan nv2500 sv v6 sv side and rear glass! rare silver color! tech pkg(US $33,000.00)
- 2013 nissan nv3500 v8 graphite blue with tow package(US $32,100.00)
- 2013 nissan nv2500 s lowroof rare midnight garnet! fly in, drive it home!!!(US $28,000.00)
- 2013 nissan nv2500 s lowroof rare black beauty! fly in, drive it home!!!(US $28,000.00)
- 2012 nissan nv 2500 v6 4 liter cargo van high roof 2d(US $25,000.00)
- 2012 nissan nv2500 nv hd high top 4.0 v6 media input am fm cd vinyl seats 23k(US $20,900.00)
Auto Services in Texas
Yale Auto ★★★★★
World Car Mazda Service ★★★★★
Wilson`s Automotive ★★★★★
Whitakers Auto Body & Paint ★★★★★
Wetzel`s Automotive ★★★★★
Wetmore Master Lube Exp Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Did Amazon just deliver a car in a giant box?
Tue, 07 Jan 2014Back in September, reports started rolling in that Amazon would get into the auto sales business after a promo for the Nissan Versa Note appeared on the online retailer's page. That link didn't actually sell a car, but instead acted as a referral service for potential customers, linking them up with dealers. A recent image that's been floating around on Reddit and that was picked up by The Huffington Post, though, has us wondering if Amazon has dove into the actual business of selling cars, rather than just referring people to dealers.
The image, above, shows an enormous Amazon box on the back of a flatbed tow truck. According to HuffPo, this could be one of the cars sold through the earlier promotion for the Versa Note (which was sweetened with the addition a $1,000 Amazon gift card). Apparently, three of the Versas purchased would arrive in such a fashion. Then again, this could all be nothing more than an elaborate publicity stunt. Amazon is, after all, the company has been touting drone delivery of its goods.
What do you think is in the box? Let us know down in Comments. Bonus points for those that come up with an idea as absurd as the bulk order of banana slicers HuffPo mentioned.
A car writer's year in new vehicles [w/video]
Thu, Dec 18 2014Christmas is only a week away. The New Year is just around the corner. As 2014 draws to a close, I'm not the only one taking stock of the year that's we're almost shut of. Depending on who you are or what you do, the end of the year can bring to mind tax bills, school semesters or scheduling dental appointments. For me, for the last eight or nine years, at least a small part of this transitory time is occupied with recalling the cars I've driven over the preceding 12 months. Since I started writing about and reviewing cars in 2006, I've done an uneven job of tracking every vehicle I've been in, each year. Last year I made a resolution to be better about it, and the result is a spreadsheet with model names, dates, notes and some basic facts and figures. Armed with this basic data and a yen for year-end stories, I figured it would be interesting to parse the figures and quantify my year in cars in a way I'd never done before. The results are, well, they're a little bizarre, honestly. And I think they'll affect how I approach this gig in 2015. {C} My tally for the year is 68 cars, as of this writing. Before the calendar flips to 2015 it'll be as high as 73. Let me give you a tiny bit of background about how automotive journalists typically get cars to test. There are basically two pools of vehicles I drive on a regular basis: media fleet vehicles and those available on "first drive" programs. The latter group is pretty self-explanatory. Journalists are gathered in one location (sometimes local, sometimes far-flung) with a new model(s), there's usually a day of driving, then we report back to you with our impressions. Media fleet vehicles are different. These are distributed to publications and individual journalists far and wide, and the test period goes from a few days to a week or more. Whereas first drives almost always result in a piece of review content, fleet loans only sometimes do. Other times they serve to give context about brands, segments, technology and the like, to editors and writers. So, adding up the loans I've had out of the press fleet and things I've driven at events, my tally for the year is 68 cars, as of this writing. Before the calendar flips to 2015, it'll be as high as 73. At one of the buff books like Car and Driver or Motor Trend, reviewers might rotate through five cars a week, or more. I know that number sounds high, but as best I can tell, it's pretty average for the full-time professionals in this business.
DC fast charging not as damaging to EV batteries as expected
Mon, Mar 17 2014As convenient as DC fast charging is, there have been lots of warnings that repeated dumping of so many electrons into an electric vehicle's battery pack in such a short time would reduce the battery's life. While everyone agrees that DC fast charging does have some effect on battery life, it may not be as bad as previously expected. Over on SimanaitisSays, Dennis Simanaitis, writes about a recent presentation by Matt Shirk of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) called DC Fast, Wireless, And Conductive Charging Evaluation Projects (PDF) that describes an ongoing test of four 2012 Nissan Leaf EVs that are being charged in two pairs of two. One pair only recharges from 50-kW DC fast chargers, which the other two sip from 3.3-kW Level 2 chargers exclusively. Otherwise, the cars are operated pretty much the same: climate is automatically set to 72 degrees, are driven on public roads around Phoenix, AZ and have the same set of dedicated drivers is rotated through the four cars. "Degradation depends more on the miles traveled than on the nature of recharging." What's most interesting are the charts on page seven of Shirk's presentation (click the image above to enlarge), which show the energy capacity of each of the four vehicles. When they were new, the four batteries were each tested to measure their energy capacity and given a 0 capacity loss baseline. They were then tested at 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 and 40,000 miles, and at each point, the DC-only EVs had roughly the same amount of battery loss as the Level 2 test subjects. The DC cars did lose a bit more at each test, but only around a 25-percent overall loss after 40k, compared to 23 percent for the Level 2 cars. Simanaitis' takeaway is that, "INL data suggest that the amount of degradation depends more on the miles traveled than on the nature of recharging." The tests are part of the INLs' Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity work and a final report is forthcoming. These initial numbers from IPL do mesh with other research into DC fast charging, though. Mitsubishi said daily fast charging wouldn't really hurt the battery in the i-MiEV and MIT tests of a Fisker Karma battery showed just 10-percent loss over 1,500 rapid charge-discharge cycles.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.04 s, 7611 u