2008 Nissan Maxima Low Reserve Navigation Sunroof Ac Cd Chicago Clean on 2040-cars
Glenview, Illinois, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Nissan
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Model: Maxima
Mileage: 29,003
Options: Sunroof
Sub Model: 4dr Sdn V6 C
Safety Features: Driver Airbag
Exterior Color: Other
Power Options: Power Windows
Interior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 6
Nissan Maxima for Sale
- 10 sv carfax certified 1-owner leather sunroof heated seats and steering used
- 2012 nissan maxima 4 door sedan v6 cvt 3.5 s / dual climate / sunroof
- 1986 nissan maxima, no reserve
- 2011 nissan maxima 3.5 sv sunroof nav rear cam 19's 46k texas direct auto(US $23,780.00)
- 2009 nissan maxima sv keyless go sunroof leather 18" wheels bluetooth automatic
- 2010 radiant silver, all leather nissan maxima s sedan 4-door 3.5l
Auto Services in Illinois
Wheels of Chicago ★★★★★
Vern`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Transmissions To Go ★★★★★
Transmatic Transmission Specialists ★★★★★
Total Auto Glass ★★★★★
Sunderland Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
Nissan teases new pickup on Twitter [w/video]
Tue, 03 Jun 2014Nissan is celebrating 80 years of building pickup trucks by teasing its latest one on Twitter ahead of a June 11 reveal. Official information about the new vehicle is essentially nonexistent at the moment, but there are some clues to extrapolate from.
There's a special member of the #Nissan family on the way. Due date: June 11th. pic.twitter.com/OkQ0GkXypV
- Nissan (@Nissan) June 2, 2014
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.
DC fast charging not as damaging to EV batteries as expected
Mon, Mar 17 2014As convenient as DC fast charging is, there have been lots of warnings that repeated dumping of so many electrons into an electric vehicle's battery pack in such a short time would reduce the battery's life. While everyone agrees that DC fast charging does have some effect on battery life, it may not be as bad as previously expected. Over on SimanaitisSays, Dennis Simanaitis, writes about a recent presentation by Matt Shirk of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) called DC Fast, Wireless, And Conductive Charging Evaluation Projects (PDF) that describes an ongoing test of four 2012 Nissan Leaf EVs that are being charged in two pairs of two. One pair only recharges from 50-kW DC fast chargers, which the other two sip from 3.3-kW Level 2 chargers exclusively. Otherwise, the cars are operated pretty much the same: climate is automatically set to 72 degrees, are driven on public roads around Phoenix, AZ and have the same set of dedicated drivers is rotated through the four cars. "Degradation depends more on the miles traveled than on the nature of recharging." What's most interesting are the charts on page seven of Shirk's presentation (click the image above to enlarge), which show the energy capacity of each of the four vehicles. When they were new, the four batteries were each tested to measure their energy capacity and given a 0 capacity loss baseline. They were then tested at 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 and 40,000 miles, and at each point, the DC-only EVs had roughly the same amount of battery loss as the Level 2 test subjects. The DC cars did lose a bit more at each test, but only around a 25-percent overall loss after 40k, compared to 23 percent for the Level 2 cars. Simanaitis' takeaway is that, "INL data suggest that the amount of degradation depends more on the miles traveled than on the nature of recharging." The tests are part of the INLs' Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity work and a final report is forthcoming. These initial numbers from IPL do mesh with other research into DC fast charging, though. Mitsubishi said daily fast charging wouldn't really hurt the battery in the i-MiEV and MIT tests of a Fisker Karma battery showed just 10-percent loss over 1,500 rapid charge-discharge cycles.