2004 Nissan Maxima Se Leather Moonroof Pearl White A/t Priced To Sell on 2040-cars
Farmingdale, New York, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Engine:3.5L 3498CC V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Year: 2004
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Nissan
Model: Maxima
Trim: SE Sedan 4-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: FWD
Options: Sunroof, Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player
Mileage: 117,000
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Sub Model: SE
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
Here is a 2004 Nissan Maxima SE. This was the first year of this body style. It is pearl white and has most factory options. Power moonroof, automatic transmission, power windows, power drivers seat, power mirrors, cruise control, alloy wheels, air bags, anti lock brakes, fog lights, turning lights, keyless entry, and AM-FM-CD-Cassette. Exterior:. The paint holds a nice shine and is very presentable. The paint is the original factory paint. However the car does have some bumps and bruises from parking lots. The rear quarter panels have some damage which is shown in the pictures. Interior: The interior is in great condition. The leather seats look great. The center arm rest has some damage Mechanical: The engine has plenty of power. The transmission shifts properly in all gears. The car drives smooth and straight on the highway. The heat and A/C work correctly. All power accessories operate correctly.The tires have about 60% thread remaining. Just had some recent work done to the car: new front brakes, new tension pulley and belt, oil change, battery, Payment: There is a $400 good faith deposit required to bid. It is fully refundable if you are not satisfied for any legitimate reason. Sorry it has to be that way but the reason is there are too many non paying bidders on Ebay. . If you are a serious bidder than the deposit should not be an issue and it is fully refundable. The balance is due within five days via certified check or cash in person. Please have your finances in order prior to bidding. Shipping/Delivery: I will deliver the car within a 250 mile radius for a fee. Fee to be determined by distance, tolls, fuel, and time. It can also be brought to local airports or train stations. Naturally full payment is required before shipping or delivery. The only exceptions are airports or train stations where you may pay in person with CASH(no certified checks at airports/trains). I will also assist you with shipping arrangements that you make. Questions: You may use the Ebay system. For a quicker response send me a phone number and I will call you ASAP. Title: I have clear title in hand. Disclaimer: You are purchasing a ten year old car with 117K miles. The car is by NO means new or in pristine condition. Please have realistic expectations. Also because of the age and miles it is sold AS-IS. The car is also priced to sell. |
Nissan Maxima for Sale
- 2009 nissan maxima 3.5 sv tech leather sunroof nav 44k texas direct auto(US $20,980.00)
- 2012 nissan maxima 3.5 s power sunroof roof bluetooth cd alloys---free shipping(US $15,450.00)
- 2012 nissan maxima s sedan 4-door 3.5l(US $24,500.00)
- 2011 nissan maxima sv - black on black, excellent condition(US $22,500.00)
- 1999 nissan maxima gle(US $2,000.00)
- We finance!! 2010 nissan maxima sv premium pano roof nav heated seats texas auto(US $22,998.00)
Auto Services in New York
Wayne`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Vk Auto Repair ★★★★★
Village Auto Body Works Inc ★★★★★
TOWING BROOKLYN TODAY.COM ★★★★★
Total Performance Incorporated ★★★★★
Tom & Arties Automotive Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
These EVs are the worst when it comes to depreciation
Mon, Jul 20 2015The Renault Fluence Z.E. tops the list of the worst depreciating cars according to a ranking compiled by Glass' Information Services, holding just 27.21 percent of its value after a year of ownership and 12,000 miles on the clock. Just as well that you can't buy the sedan anymore in either electric or ICE versions, since it was discontinued last year. This car took a particularly rough hit when Better Place declared bankrutpcy, since the electric Fluence was a specific fit for the aspirations of the battery-swapping company. The Citroen C-Zero hits the list at number four, the Nissan Leaf E at number five, both holding onto just a third of their value after a year. The C-Zero is a rebadged Mitsubishi i-MiEV, and if you bought one stock for the full UK on-the-road price of 26,766 pounds, you'd have a car worth 8,583.86 pounds twelve months later, according to Glass. We're not sure about the wording of the press release, though - it states that those three cars "lost more than three-quarters of their value." Yet the Fluence E Z.E. is the worst offender, and it doesn't dip below 25 percent of its original value. As with those electrics, the rest of the list is made up of aged or barebones ICE models, some of them touted elsewhere for their popularity. You can find the full list and the valuations in the press release below. ELECTRIC CARS AMONG WORST FIRST YEAR DEPRECIATORS Fluence, C-Zero and LEAF all lose more than three-quarters of their value 15/07/15 - Three electric cars are among the worst first year depreciators in a "Bottom 10" released by motor trade valuation market leaders Glass's. The Renault Fluence, Citroen C-Zero and Nissan LEAF E have all lost more than three-quarters of their value after covering 12,000 miles during the last 12 months. Rupert Pontin, head of valuations at Glass, said: "The motor trade and the used car buying public remain interested in electric cars but are still reticent to actually buy them in numbers – and these depreciation figures reflect that fact. "To be fair, these three EVs are among some of the least attractive on the market – the Fluence and C-Zero both have a 'last generation' feel while the LEAF E is on the bottom rung of the LEAF range – but their presence does reflect the fact that the EV sector remains sluggish." Other models in the list include the lowest-powered, entry level versions of some generally popular but aging models such as the Vauxhall Insignia and Renault Megane.
Is your new-car warranty good at the race track?
Mon, Feb 27 2017We've all heard the horror stories. Your buddy knows a girl that was dating a guy whose best friend's brother once broke his brand-new, recently purchased performance car while making runs at a drag strip or laps at a track day, and the manufacturer wouldn't cover the repair under warranty. True story? Urban legend? Complete crap? Yes, no, maybe. One thing's for sure: Automotive warranties have always come with caveats. In 1908, an ad in the Trenton Evening Times clearly stated: "All Ford Cars Guaranteed for One Year." Although it changed over time, by 1925 the Ford New Car Guarantee only covered 90 days on material and 30 days on labor, and it clearly stated that that there was "No guarantee whatever on Fan Belts, Glass, Bulbs, Wiring, Transmission, Bands, Hose Connections, Commutator Shells, Rollers, Spark Plugs or Gaskets." Whether or not Ol' Henry would pay to fix your Model T if you broke it shaving a tenth off your lap time at the local board track seems to be lost to history. We're guessing no. But what about today? Do new-car warranties in 2017 cover cars when they are driven on race tracks? We researched the warranties of 14 auto brands to find out, and the answer is yes, no, maybe, depending on the brand, in some cases the model, and whether or not your car is modified from stock. Acura has been out of the high-performance car game for a number of years, but jumps back into the party in 2017 with its hybrid-powered $173,000 NSX supercar. And Acura's warranty, as well as Honda's, clearly states that it does not cover "the use of the vehicle in competition or racing events." View 33 Photos So we asked Sage Marie, Senior Manager of Public Relations for Honda and Acura. "If the car is stock, the warranty covers it on a track just as it does on the street. No question," he told us. "However, if the car is modified, say with slick tires or other components that would put higher stresses on the vehicle's parts and systems, then we would have to investigate the circumstances further." Marie went on to say the same would be true for any Acura model or Honda vehicle, including the new 2017 Honda Civic Si. This became a common theme. Chevrolet actually started this practice with the fifth-generation Camaro on the high-performance ZL1 and Z/28 models.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.029 s, 7696 u