Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Nissan Frontier 4wd Crew Cab Lwb With Sunroof & Leather on 2040-cars

Year:2007 Mileage:74580 Color: Blue /
 Tan
Location:

Tampa, Florida, United States

Tampa, Florida, United States
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 1N6AD09WX7C463494 Year: 2007
Make: Nissan
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Other
Model: Frontier
Mileage: 74,580
Sub Model: LE 4X4 Leath
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: Blue
Doors: 4
Interior Color: Tan
Drive Train: Four Wheel Drive
Inspection: Vehicle has been inspected
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Florida

Zip Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 5630 Maloney Ave, Sugarloaf
Phone: (305) 292-6915

X-Lent Auto Body, Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1422 9th St W, Siesta-Key
Phone: (941) 747-0686

Wilde Jaguar of Sarasota ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 4821 Clark Road, Tallevast
Phone: (941) 924-3019

Wheeler Power Products ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Machine Shop
Address: Julington-Creek
Phone: (904) 317-8099

Westland Motors R C P Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 3699 NW 79th St, Miramar
Phone: (305) 696-1116

West Coast Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supply-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 1444 Alternate Hwy 19, Holiday
Phone: (727) 937-5196

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

Andy Palmer leaves Renault-Nissan to serve as CEO of Aston Martin

Tue, 02 Sep 2014

Aston Martin has been without a helmsman since Ulrich Bez stepped down from the chief executive office at the end of last year, stepping back to serve as non-executive chairman in a semi-retired ambassadorial capacity. The British automaker, now on the cusp of a new era, has been running without a CEO since, but has now named Bez's replacement in Andy Palmer.
If you don't recognize the name, you should: Palmer has worked under the Renault-Nissan Alliance for decades now, rising through the ranks to become one of the top executives under Carlos Ghosn. Most recently he was serving as executive vice president of the entire group and chairman of the Infiniti brand, but like Carlos Tavares, who recently left Renault to run Peugeot, Palmer is now embarking on a new mission as CEO of Aston Martin.
Once the transition period is complete at the start of October, Palmer's role as Chief Planning Officer at Renault-Nissan will be assumed by Philippe Klein, who steps up from his current role as executive vice president of product planning for Renault. Read the statements from both companies below.

Tesla, BMW and Nissan meeting in secret to discuss charging tech

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's interesting what's happening in the electric vehicle field. It used to be that BMW and Tesla were competitors. Then – and of course they're still competing, especially in the public mind – they were working together on ... something. Maybe. And now, the Financial Times reports that the two luxury automakers are meeting with Nissan. Again, maybe. The scuttlebutt is that the three companies are interested in working together on something to do with charging electric vehicles, potentially a global recharging standard. Currently, when it comes to fast charging, BMW uses the SAE Combo standard, Nissan uses CHAdeMO and Tesla uses its own Superchargers. The meeting was prompted by Tesla opening of all of its patents the other day, FT says. Speaking during the recent annual shareholder meeting, Musk said he was "more than happy to have other manufacturers" use Tesla's Superchargers but that, "there is no other electric car that can accept anything close to 135 kilowatts." Let's assume the technical hurdle can be overcome. With any potential patent/licensing problems out of the way, these discussions with BMW and Nissan might be revolving around this other angle that Musk mentioned: "They (other automakers) just have to contribute to the capital cost, so figure out what percentage of the time are their cars using the Supercharger network and then they can make a contribution proportionate to their customer usage of the Supercharger network." That certainly sounds like something that could take some time to figure out. News Source: Financial TimesImage Credit: Elbilforeningen / Flickr Green BMW Nissan Tesla Electric supercharger chademo sae combo