Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Nissan Frontier Sv on 2040-cars

US $27,156.00
Year:2014 Mileage:12 Color: Glacier
Location:

3707 Summerhill Rd, Texarkana, Texas, United States

3707 Summerhill Rd, Texarkana, Texas, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:4.0L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1N6AD0ER8EN739964
Stock Num: M5964
Make: Nissan
Model: Frontier SV
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Glacier
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Bluetooth wireless phone connectivity
  • Bucket front seats
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Driver Seat Head Restraint Whiplash Protection
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 40.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 55.6"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 42.4"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 58.3"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 21.1 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 16 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 22 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Head Restraint Whiplash Protection with Passenger Seat
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Metal-look dash trim
  • Overall height: 70.1"
  • Overall Width: 72.8"
  • Overhead console: Mini with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • passenger and rear
  • Privacy glass: Deep
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 38.7"
  • Rear Hip Room: 58.0"
  • Rear Leg Room: 33.6"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 58.3"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatback storage: 1
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Speed Rating: T
  • Tires: Width: 265 mm
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 12

Pete Mankins Nissan has been proudly serving the community for over fifty years. Ask around about us!! Our Internet client managers are here to serve your needs.

Auto Services in Texas

Yale Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2510 Yale St, Houston
Phone: (713) 862-3509

World Car Mazda Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 132 N Balcones Rd, Lackland
Phone: (210) 735-8500

Wilson`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5121 E Parkway St, Pinehurst
Phone: (409) 963-1289

Whitakers Auto Body & Paint ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 15303 Pheasant Ln, Mc-Neil
Phone: (512) 402-8392

Wetzel`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 24441 Fm 2090 Rd, Patton
Phone: (281) 689-1313

Wetmore Master Lube Exp Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 503 Bluff Trl, Live-Oak
Phone: (210) 693-1780

Auto blog

Autoblog's Editors' Picks: Our complete list of the best new vehicles

Mon, May 13 2024

It's not easy to earn an “EditorsÂ’ Picks” at Autoblog as part of the rating and review process that every new vehicle goes through. Our editors have been at it a long time, which means weÂ’ve driven and reviewed virtually every new car you can go buy on the dealer lot. There are disagreements, of course, and all vehicles have their strengths and weaknesses, but this list features what we think are the best new vehicles chosen by Autoblog editors. We started this formal review process back in 2018, so there's quite of few of them now. So what does it mean to be an EditorsÂ’ Pick? In short, it means itÂ’s a car that we can highly recommend purchasing. There may be one, multiple, or even zero vehicles in any given segment that we give the green light to. What really matters is that itÂ’s a vehicle that weÂ’d tell a friend or family member to go buy if theyÂ’re considering it, because itÂ’s a very good car. The best way to use this list is is with the navigation links below. Click on a segment, and you'll quickly arrive at the top rated pickup truck or SUV, for example. Use the back button to return to these links and search in another segment, like sedans. If youÂ’ve been keeping up with our monthly series of the latest vehicles to earn EditorsÂ’ Pick status, youÂ’re likely going to be familiar with this list already. If not, welcome to the complete list that weÂ’ll be keeping updated as vehicles enter (and others perhaps exit) the good graces of our editorial team. We rate a new car — giving it a numerical score out of 10 — every time thereÂ’s a significant refresh or if it happens to be an all-new model. Any given vehicle may be impressive on a first drive, but we wait until itÂ’s in the hands of our editors to put it through the same type of testing as every other vehicle that rolls through our test fleet before giving it the EditorsÂ’ Pick badge. This ensures consistency and allows more voices to be heard on each individual model. And just so you donÂ’t think weÂ’ve skipped trims or variants of a model, we hand out the EditorsÂ’ Pick based on the overarching model to keep things consistent. So, when you read that the 3 Series is an EditorsÂ’ Pick, yes, that includes the 330i to the M3 and all the variants in between. If thereÂ’s a particular version of that car we vehemently disagree with, we make sure to call that out.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

These EVs are the worst when it comes to depreciation

Mon, Jul 20 2015

The Renault Fluence Z.E. tops the list of the worst depreciating cars according to a ranking compiled by Glass' Information Services, holding just 27.21 percent of its value after a year of ownership and 12,000 miles on the clock. Just as well that you can't buy the sedan anymore in either electric or ICE versions, since it was discontinued last year. This car took a particularly rough hit when Better Place declared bankrutpcy, since the electric Fluence was a specific fit for the aspirations of the battery-swapping company. The Citroen C-Zero hits the list at number four, the Nissan Leaf E at number five, both holding onto just a third of their value after a year. The C-Zero is a rebadged Mitsubishi i-MiEV, and if you bought one stock for the full UK on-the-road price of 26,766 pounds, you'd have a car worth 8,583.86 pounds twelve months later, according to Glass. We're not sure about the wording of the press release, though - it states that those three cars "lost more than three-quarters of their value." Yet the Fluence E Z.E. is the worst offender, and it doesn't dip below 25 percent of its original value. As with those electrics, the rest of the list is made up of aged or barebones ICE models, some of them touted elsewhere for their popularity. You can find the full list and the valuations in the press release below. ELECTRIC CARS AMONG WORST FIRST YEAR DEPRECIATORS Fluence, C-Zero and LEAF all lose more than three-quarters of their value 15/07/15 - Three electric cars are among the worst first year depreciators in a "Bottom 10" released by motor trade valuation market leaders Glass's. The Renault Fluence, Citroen C-Zero and Nissan LEAF E have all lost more than three-quarters of their value after covering 12,000 miles during the last 12 months. Rupert Pontin, head of valuations at Glass, said: "The motor trade and the used car buying public remain interested in electric cars but are still reticent to actually buy them in numbers – and these depreciation figures reflect that fact. "To be fair, these three EVs are among some of the least attractive on the market – the Fluence and C-Zero both have a 'last generation' feel while the LEAF E is on the bottom rung of the LEAF range – but their presence does reflect the fact that the EV sector remains sluggish." Other models in the list include the lowest-powered, entry level versions of some generally popular but aging models such as the Vauxhall Insignia and Renault Megane.