Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2012 Nissan Frontier Pro 4x Extra Cab on 2040-cars

Year:2012 Mileage:22000
Location:

Grand Junction, Colorado, United States

Grand Junction, Colorado, United States

We have Three(3) of these Frontier PRO 4X Trucks, All have similar milage and are for sale.
As seen in the photo, there is some damage to this one from a fender bender.  We are accounting for this as noticed by the great price and no reserve. This would make a great addition to any Security or Safety fleet, as it did for us. Fleet Maintained, Records available
Upon purchase of this vehicle, we will require a $1000.00 nonrefundable deposit and we will remove the company logo graphic. Current odometer reads 22,123 but may be slightly higher, as it is being periodically driven. This auction may be ended at any time and this truck is being offered for sale locally. 
  

Auto Services in Colorado

Windsor Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Wash, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 9640 E Alameda Ave, Aurora
Phone: (303) 343-8200

West Side Auto Body & Towing ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supply-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Towing
Address: 9719 W Coal Mine Ave Suite P, Lowry
Phone: (720) 255-0343

Toyexus Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 700 S Broadway, Lone-Tree
Phone: (303) 722-0234

Tito`s Cash for Cars ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Towing
Address: Foxton
Phone: (303) 250-5079

Suzuki-Mccloskey ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 6710 N Academy Blvd, Green-Mountain-Falls
Phone: (719) 685-7030

Red Rock Auto Clinic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 1840 W Uintah St, Colo-Spgs
Phone: (719) 471-3311

Auto blog

Did Nissan send a ringer GT-R to run the 'Ring? [w/video]

Mon, 25 Nov 2013

It turns out that after toting a 7:08 time around the fearsome Nürburgring Nordschleife for the new Nismo-tuned GT-R, Nissan might not have been entirely honest about the car it was using. From what we've been hearing from a few different publications, the GT-R featured in the video isn't what we're going to see on the production model.
PistonHeads reported on the so-called "Time Attack" GT-R while it was in Japan for the Tokyo Motor Show, going so far as to detail the differences between it and the standard GT-R Nismo. And friends, this isn't just a matter of swapping tires. The mods made to the Time Attack car are far more comprehensive.
For a start, the TA produces more downforce thanks to larger aerodynamic pieces. It's some 110 pounds lighter than the standard car, thanks to new bucket seats. The ECU and dampers have been swapped for new units, and the brake pads are different as well. If you've read this far, you might be feeling slightly angry or betrayed that Nissan is toting numbers for a modified car. Don't be.

2014 Nissan GT-R [w/video]

Thu, 11 Jul 2013

Chasing The Legend
There are only a handful of vehicles in existence that can change you permanently - ones that have the power to rewire your concept of speed to fit their definition. Some five years after the Nissan GT-R legally touched down here in the US for the first time, the coupe is still bending perceptions of what it means to be a supercar in the modern age. For 2014, engineers reworked the GT-R's twin-turbocharged 3.8-liter V6 engine for more power, tweaked the transmission and massaged the suspension for ever more speed. Yes, that's right, I said more speed.
The changes have sharpened one of the best performance buys on the market into a weapons-grade track assault vehicle that just so happens to be street legal. More than ever, this is a car that rankles established supercar players with names like Lamborghini, Ferrari and Porsche, and does so with a Nissan badge on the hood.

Cadillac tops Tesla in Consumer Reports semi-automated driving test

Thu, Oct 4 2018

General Motors' Cadillac outscored Tesla in a new ranking of partially automated driving systems tested by Consumer Reports and released on Thursday. The highly influential nonprofit organization, which tests and rates a variety of consumer products from appliances to vehicles, said it compared Cadillac's Super Cruise and Tesla's Autopilot with similar systems from Nissan and Volvo. Nissan's ProPilot Assist was ranked third and Volvo's Pilot Assist fourth. Consumer Reports said it has been testing partially automated driving systems for several years but elected to conduct a formal study intended for publication, because "we are at a tipping point where they are now going mainstream," according to Jake Fisher, director of auto testing. The organization said its tests, conducted on a private track and on public roads in Connecticut, were designed to measure the systems' ability to automatically control steering and speed in certain situations, while helping drivers pay attention and regain manual control of the vehicle when required. CR noted that any of these systems can increase driving risk if used in inappropriate situations, or if drivers become inattentive or over-reliant on them. While they can help relieve driver stress and fatigue, Consumer Reports said, the partially automated systems are "not intended to be self-driving features." The systems typically use cameras, radar and other sensors, as well as mapping data, to monitor location and traffic conditions and help keep a vehicle centered in the lane at a safe distance behind other cars. Each system has limitations. Cadillac's Super Cruise, for instance, only functions on divided highways that have been mapped by GM. In contrast, Tesla's Autopilot can be used even on small, curvy roads with poor lane markings, but "operates erratically in those situations," Consumer Reports said.The organization tested Super Cruise on the Cadillac CT6; Autopilot on the Tesla Model 3, Model X and Model S; ProPilot Assist on the Nissan Leaf and Infiniti QX50; and Pilot Assist on the Volvo XC40 and XC60. Consumer Reports said Cadillac's Super Cruise did "the best job of balancing high-tech capabilities with ensuring the car is operated safely and the driver is paying attention." Tesla's Autopilot was cited for its capability and ease of use, while Nissan's ProPilot Assist did a better job than Autopilot or Volvo's Pilot Assist in keeping drivers engaged.