Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Nissan Altima 2.5 Sv on 2040-cars

US $23,272.00
Year:2014 Mileage:0 Color: Super Black
Location:

5815 Dixie Highway, Fairfield, Ohio, United States

5815 Dixie Highway, Fairfield, Ohio, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:2.5L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic CVT
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1N4AL3AP3EC199601
Stock Num: M8931
Make: Nissan
Model: Altima 2.5 SV
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Super Black
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Black grille w/chrome surround
  • Bluetooth wireless phone connectivity
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Digital Audio Input
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Four-wheel Independent Suspension
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Head Room: 40.0"
  • Front Hip Room
  • Front Leg Room: 45.0"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 56.4"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 18.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 27 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 38 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 4,211 lbs.
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Independent rear suspension
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 7.9 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 15 cu.ft.
  • MP3 player
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall height: 57.9"
  • Overall Length: 191.5"
  • Overall Width: 72.0"
  • Overhead console: Mini with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear bench
  • Rear Head Room: 37.1"
  • Rear Leg Room: 36.1"
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 56.4"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Stability control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Trip computer
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Video Monitor Location: Front
  • Wheelbase: 109.3"
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

Safety equipment includes: ABS, Traction control, Curtain airbags, Passenger Airbag...FEATURES INCLUDE: Bluetooth, Power locks, Power windows, CVT Transmission, Climate control...

Auto Services in Ohio

Weber Road Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1100 E Weber Rd, Grove-City
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Twinsburg Brake & Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 2266 E Aurora Rd, Chagrin-Falls
Phone: (330) 405-5156

Trost`s Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 4 S Main St, Bradford
Phone: (937) 676-5751

TransColonial Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 8228 Washington St, Pepper-Pike
Phone: (440) 543-3355

Top Tech Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3850 E 5th Ave, Pataskala
Phone: (614) 238-3603

Tire Discounters ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels
Address: 2039 E Dublin Granville Rd, New-Albany
Phone: (614) 888-7200

Auto blog

Next Nissan Rogue flaunts its new look

Fri, 14 Jun 2013

Remember last April, when Nissan told us it would be launching five new models over the course of 15 months? Well, we've seen the Altima, Pathfinder, Sentra and Versa Note, so that magical fifth model has to be the new Rogue, which our spy photographers recently caught testing. Despite looking like a hodge-podge of black duct tape and garbage bags, we can clearly see that the new Rogue takes a lot of its styling cues from the Hi-Cross concept that Nissan showed at the 2012 Geneva Motor Show. And that's fine - we found that CUV concept to be a decidedly handsome thing, and certainly more attractive than the weird little Rogue that currently roams the streets.
Details surrounding the next Rogue are still very unclear, though our spies suggest that it could be powered by a new 1.2-liter supercharged four-cylinder engine, good for something like 113 horsepower and 140 pound-feet of torque. We'll see about that, since those numbers represent a drastic drop in power versus the current Rogue - to the tune of 57 hp and 35 lb-ft. A diesel engine for other markets is expected to be on offer, and a plug-in hybrid version is also rumored to be in the works, though that won't show up at the vehicle's initial launch.
If Nissan sticks to its plan of showing these five new models in the course of 15 months, that means we should see the Rogue in July. Of course, since things don't always go as planned, it could be many more months before all that camouflage is taken away.

2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo to hit 60 mph in 2 seconds?

Wed, 31 Jul 2013

Here's your daily dose of incredulity - AutoExpress is reporting the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo will hit 60 miles per hour in two seconds. Okay. The report comes from an unnamed source that AE spoke with at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, and would mean that the GT-R Nismo, a car that will likely sit below $150,000, will be able to outsprint (over short distances) a 1200-horsepower, $2.58-million Bugatti Veyron Super Sport.
Citing a more potent version of the GT-R's twin-turbocharged V-6 along with a healthy drop in weight, AutoExpress says that the performance is the result of the same group that helped develop the Juke Nismo, Williams Advanced Engineering. An unnamed engineer for Williams (it's not made clear if this is the same source from Goodwood) notes that there are improvements to be had "even with a car like the GT-R."
As exciting as the GT-R Nismo is going to be, we're having a hard time accepting that it will be able to hit 60 in two seconds flat, at least on street tires. What do you think? Have your say in Comments.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.