2006 Nissan Xterra X 4wd on 2040-cars
5200 Dixie Hwy, Fairfield, Ohio, United States
Engine:Gas V6 4.0L/241
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5N1AN08WX6C543518
Stock Num: FP041445
Make: Nissan
Model: Xterra X 4WD
Year: 2006
Exterior Color: Silver Lightning Metallic
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 124407
2006 NISSAN XTERRA 4WD**2 OWNERS**NO ACCIDENTS, OR DAMAGE**9 SERVICE RECORDS AVAILABLE!! 4.0L V6, 4WD, POWER WINDOWS, LOCKS, TILT, CRUISE, AM/FM/CD. SUPER CLEAN!! Internet special. Price reflects discount for cash buyers. Traditional and special financing is available for qualified buyers. Please contact us first for availability as our cars go fast at near wholesale prices. Prices are subject to change. Sales Tax, Title, License Fee, Registration Fee, Dealer Documentary Fee, Finance Charges, Emission Testing Fees and Compliance Fees are additional to the advertised price. All options and conditions of the vehicles must be verified with the dealer, any descriptions or options that are listed maybe incorrect due to automatic data transfer. Options Installed 4WD/AWD,ABS Brakes,Air Conditioning,AM/FM Radio,Cargo Area Tiedowns,CD Player,Child Safety Door Locks,Deep Tinted Glass,Driver Airbag,Full Size Spare Tire,Interval Wipers,Load Bearing Exterior Rack,Passenger Airbag,Rear Window Defogger,Rear Wiper,Second Row Folding Seat,Skid Plate,Steel Wheels,Tachometer,Tilt Steering,Tilt Steering Column,Tire Pressure Monitor,Traction Control,Vehicle Stability Control System,GAS,
Nissan Xterra for Sale
- 2004 nissan xterra(US $10,881.00)
- 2012 nissan xterra s(US $19,880.00)
- 2007 nissan xterra(US $11,880.00)
- 2014 nissan xterra x(US $24,490.00)
- 2014 nissan xterra x(US $24,655.00)
- 2003 nissan xterra se(US $7,495.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
Westerville Automotive ★★★★★
West Chester Autobody ★★★★★
Unique Auto Painting ★★★★★
Thrifty Mufflers ★★★★★
The Right Place Automotive ★★★★★
Superior Automotive & Truck Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
DC fast charging not as damaging to EV batteries as expected
Mon, Mar 17 2014As convenient as DC fast charging is, there have been lots of warnings that repeated dumping of so many electrons into an electric vehicle's battery pack in such a short time would reduce the battery's life. While everyone agrees that DC fast charging does have some effect on battery life, it may not be as bad as previously expected. Over on SimanaitisSays, Dennis Simanaitis, writes about a recent presentation by Matt Shirk of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) called DC Fast, Wireless, And Conductive Charging Evaluation Projects (PDF) that describes an ongoing test of four 2012 Nissan Leaf EVs that are being charged in two pairs of two. One pair only recharges from 50-kW DC fast chargers, which the other two sip from 3.3-kW Level 2 chargers exclusively. Otherwise, the cars are operated pretty much the same: climate is automatically set to 72 degrees, are driven on public roads around Phoenix, AZ and have the same set of dedicated drivers is rotated through the four cars. "Degradation depends more on the miles traveled than on the nature of recharging." What's most interesting are the charts on page seven of Shirk's presentation (click the image above to enlarge), which show the energy capacity of each of the four vehicles. When they were new, the four batteries were each tested to measure their energy capacity and given a 0 capacity loss baseline. They were then tested at 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 and 40,000 miles, and at each point, the DC-only EVs had roughly the same amount of battery loss as the Level 2 test subjects. The DC cars did lose a bit more at each test, but only around a 25-percent overall loss after 40k, compared to 23 percent for the Level 2 cars. Simanaitis' takeaway is that, "INL data suggest that the amount of degradation depends more on the miles traveled than on the nature of recharging." The tests are part of the INLs' Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity work and a final report is forthcoming. These initial numbers from IPL do mesh with other research into DC fast charging, though. Mitsubishi said daily fast charging wouldn't really hurt the battery in the i-MiEV and MIT tests of a Fisker Karma battery showed just 10-percent loss over 1,500 rapid charge-discharge cycles.
Nissan GT-R Nismo 'Ring time makes it track's 'fastest volume production car' [w/video]
Tue, 19 Nov 2013Performance cars are fun to drive and all, but at the end of the day ,owners drop big bucks on what are often ridiculously unpractical vehicles for the bragging rights. And when it comes to ultimate bragging rights, few get more publicized than lap times for everyone's favorite stretch of German pavement, the Nürburgring. Enter the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo.
After rumors about a 7:08 lap time appeared yesterday, Nissan confirmed has confirmed the news today with video footage of the run, which took place on September 30. The official lap time is just seven minutes and 8.679 seconds, putting the GT-R Nismo about 11 seconds off the pace of the Porsche 918 Spyder - some six seconds quicker than the far costlier Lexus LFA. Some admitted - but hard-to-spot - missteps by Nissan driver Michael Krumm would indicate that the car actually left some time on the table.
With this time, Nissan claims that the 595-horsepower GT-R Nismo is the "fastest volume production car" around the track. The definition of "volume" could surely be contested here, though, considering the small numbers in which the GT-R is sold. While we don't have global GT-R sales figures, this year has only seen 1,063 units sold through October, and there were close to 1,300 sold in all of 2011 and about 1,200 in 2012. While this loosely defined claim will only add to the Nürburgring lap time squabbling, it is no less impressive. Check out the record run for yourself in the video below, which is accompanied by an official press release.
Formula Drift kicks off 11th season on Streets of Long Beach
Tue, 08 Apr 2014The 2014 Formula Drift series kicked off last weekend in Long Beach, and saw Chris Forsberg, who you'll recall went mad and drifted around a warehouse in an Infiniti M, take the title behind the wheel of his Hankook Tire Nissan 370Z (shown above).
Forsberg really ran away with the first round of competition, outscoring his closest opponent, second-place finisher Kenneth Moen and his Bridges Racing Nissan 240SX, by 20 points. Third place was 2013 championship winner Michael Essa and his Yokohama BMW M3, 30.5 points behind Forsberg.
In the manufacturers' title, Nissan took an early lead with 122 points, which isn't a huge surprise considering five of the top ten drifters were piloting either a Z or a product of the brand's S platform. Ford, which had two drivers (Justin Pawlak and Vaughn Gittin, Jr.) in the top ten, took home second place, while BMW is currently third in the manufacturers' standings.