2014 Nissan Titan Sv on 2040-cars
1123 Freeway Dr, Reidsville, North Carolina, United States
Engine:5.6L V8 32V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1N6BA0CC5EN503879
Stock Num: 8121
Make: Nissan
Model: Titan SV
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Galaxy Black Metallic
Interior Color: Charcoal
Options: Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 6
POSTED PRICE IS *****MSRP***** and *****DOES NOT***** include available Manufacturer Rebates or other Dealership Incentives or Discounts. ***Please CALL 888-619-2812 and ask for DUANE for our INTERNET $ALE$ NEW CAR DI$COUNT and BEST PRICE!!!!***Reidsville Nissan is proud to be THE Triad Automotive Leader providing a small town atmosphere that BEATS big town prices! Also serving Greensboro, Winston Salem, High Point, Danville, and Martinsville! Our commitment to customer service here at Reidsville Nissan is like no other! Each New Car purchasing customer will receive their 1ST OIL CHANGE FREE and 6 FREE DETAILS as part of our commitment to long term customer satisfaction! ***REFUSE TO LOSE NEW CAR SALES EVENT*** Bring us a written deal from ANY other Nissan Dealership and we will beat their offer by at least $500 or you will get $1,000 CASH. Offer valid until 06/30/2014. Posted prices *****DO NOT***** include available Manufacturer Rebates or other Dealership Incentives or Discounts. ***Please CALL 888-619-2812 and ask for DUANE for our INTERNET $ALE$ NEW CAR DI$COUNT and BEST PRICE!!!!*** ***CARS.COM NEW CAR SPECIAL*** Here at Reidsville Nissan we would like to thank you for shopping online at CARS.COM. To receive a special CARS.COM DISCOUNT PRICE, please call DUANE @ 888-619-2812 and mention this special!!!
Nissan Titan for Sale
- 2014 nissan titan sv(US $40,020.00)
- 2013 nissan titan pro-4x(US $44,975.00)
- 2012 nissan titan sl(US $32,197.00)
- 2014 nissan titan sv(US $37,500.00)
- 2014 nissan titan sv(US $40,120.00)
- 2014 nissan titan sl(US $45,595.00)
Auto Services in North Carolina
Xpress Lube ★★★★★
Wrightsboro Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Wilburn Auto Body Shop - Lake Norman ★★★★★
Wheeler Troy Honda Car Service ★★★★★
Truck Alterations ★★★★★
Troy`s Auto & Machine Shop ★★★★★
Auto blog
Nissan quietly, quickly installing more CHAdeMO stations
Wed, Jul 2 2014Nissan Leaf electric-vehicle sales continue to grow. And the number of US fast-charging stations that the Leaf can use are growing, well, faster. As it should be. Nissan has made good on its early-2013 vow to help ensure that the number of CHAdeMO stations in the US tripled by mid-2014, with Atlanta, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Dallas emerging as the most prevalent US markets, Green Car Reports says. In fact, the number of such stations, which can charge a Leaf to 80-percent battery capacity in about a half hour, has jumped to 633 from about 160 as of January 2013. About 180 are at Nissan dealerships, and that number should continue to surge since Nissan plans to aggressively add fast-charging stations through next March. Nissan spokesman Brian Brockman, in an e-mail to AutoblogGreen, confirmed those numbers and added that companies such as NRG, through its eVgo program, are also adding fast chargers throughout the country. The continued increase is good news for drivers of the Mitsubishi i (okay, we admit, there are not that many of them out there) and future drivers of the Kia Soul EV, as both of the models are CHAdeMO-compatible. Granted, the US has nothing on Europe, where the number of CHAdeMO stations has jumped to more than 1,000 from about 600 stations early last year. Nissan expects the continent to have about 1,800 fast-charging stations by year end. Still, the number of US CHAdeMO stations dwarfs the number of Tesla Motors' Supercharger stations, which total about 100.
Here's how to follow this weekend's 24 Hours of Le Mans
Thu, Jun 11 2015In the pantheon of motorsports, the 24 Hours of Le Mans stands as one of the great endurance challenges to man and machine. This year's event in France already looks to be one for the ages with Porsche setting record-breaking times in practice and the competition debut of Nissan's front-engine, hybrid racer. Thankfully, there's a massive list of ways to follow this automotive attraction. Reilly Brennan, the Executive Director of the Revs Automotive Research Program at Stanford University, and a friend of Autoblog, has once again assembled a helpful couch-kit to organize many of the options. Unfortunately, the old-school way of just turning on the television might be the most frustrating way to watch Le Mans this year. Fox Sports 1 and 2 are carrying about half the race, but the coverage bounces between them seemingly at random. The broadcast begins on Fox Sports 2 at 8:30 AM Eastern ahead of the 9:00 AM start and lasts there until 12:00 PM. Things don't pick up again until 7:00 PM Eastern on Fox Sports 1 for an hour, and the channels swap back and forth more from there. The Fox Sports Go streaming app offers more, but even it stops showing the race a few times. Thankfully, streaming Le Mans is easy. If you can't dedicate 24-hours on the couch, Radio Le Mans lets you listen to audio commentary anywhere with some of the best announcers in the biz. The Automobile Club de l'Ouest, the governing body for the race, also offers an official video stream in an app for $9.99. For a really low-tech solution, the official Twitter is another choice. Brennan is keeping his list updated with coverage changes. You can also check out and download the spotter's guide (from Nissan) in the gallery above. Enjoy this year's race. If you miss anything, don't worry; expect a full report from Autoblog. In fact, editor-in-chief Mike Austin is attending Le Mans this year, so follow him on Twitter for on-the-fly impressions. Featured Gallery 2015 24 Hours of Le Mans Spotter's Guide News Source: Reilly BrennanImage Credit: Nissan Motorsports Audi Nissan Porsche Toyota Hybrid Racing Vehicles
BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index
Mon, Oct 10 2016While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.