Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Nissan Sentra S on 2040-cars

US $17,862.00
Year:2014 Mileage:7 Color: Brilliant Silver /
 Charcoal
Location:

4302 Lafayette Rd., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

4302 Lafayette Rd., Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:1.8L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic CVT
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3N1AB7AP5EY249607
Stock Num: C4287
Make: Nissan
Model: Sentra S
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Brilliant Silver
Interior Color: Charcoal
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Dual vanity mirrors
  • Engine immobilizer
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Head Room: 39.4"
  • Front Hip Room: 50.9"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 42.5"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 54.7"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 13.2 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Max cargo capacity: 15 cu.ft.
  • MP3 player
  • One 12V DC power outlet
  • Overall height: 58.9"
  • Overall Width: 69.3"
  • Overhead console: Mini with storage
  • passenge
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Radio Data System
  • Rear bench
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear Head Room: 36.7"
  • Rear Hip Room: 50.1"
  • Rear Leg Room: 37.4"
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 53.9"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Semi-independent rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Speed Sensitive Audio Volume Control
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Stability control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Torsion beam rear suspension
  • Trip computer
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Width: 6.5
  • Wheelbase: 106.3"
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 7

Please call 877-648-9846 and ask for the Internet department.

Auto Services in Indiana

Zang`s Collision Consultants ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4165 Harrison Ave, Lawrenceburg
Phone: (513) 574-5330

Woody`s Hot Rodz ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Customizing
Address: Cross-Plains
Phone: (812) 637-1933

Wilson`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 210 E South St, Perrysville
Phone: (217) 442-3382

Vrabic Car Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive, Brake Repair
Address: 1300 Lafayette Ave, Staunton
Phone: (812) 232-0681

Vorderman Autobody ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 5515 Industrial Rd, Churubusco
Phone: (260) 482-7775

Voelz Body Shop Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 3471 Market St, Clifford
Phone: (812) 376-8868

Auto blog

Nissan's Ghosn called out by Deltawing's Panoz in print ad

Wed, 25 Jun 2014

When the Nissan ZEOD RC limped to the side of the Circuit de la Sarthe a mere five laps into this year's 24 Hours of Le Mans, we imagine that a certain American motorsports figure at least smirked a little. Don Panoz's ongoing feud with Nissan probably means he wasn't sorry to see the arrow-shaped racecar's poor showing, and now he's stepping up his campaign against his former racing partner.
For those who need a refresher, back in 2012, Panoz and Nissan teamed up to field the DeltaWing, an innovative, wedge-shaped racer, as the first entry in the 24 Hours of Le Mans' experimental Garage 56 concept. The car rapidly became a fan favorite. The Panoz/Nissan alliance didn't last, though, and before long, the DeltaWing's designer was getting a paycheck from Nissan and the ZEOD RC racer arrived. Shortly after that, Panoz began mulling over a lawsuit alleging intellectual property infringement. The American motorsports icon would eventually pull the trigger on a suit back in December of 2013.
Panoz's latest move in the ongoing feud involves an open letter in both The Nashville Tennessean, the paper that serves Nissan's US headquarters, and trade paper Automotive News. The letter calls out Renault-Nissan CEO Carlos Ghosn directly, and points out some of the similarities between the DeltaWing and the ZEOD RC, going so far as to quote the original car's designer, Ben Bowlby.

Porsche 911 GT3 dukes it out with MP4-12C on track and GT-R on spectacular roads

Thu, 22 Aug 2013

The Porsche 911 GT3 has always been a favorite among auto journalists and car enthusiasts alike, but with the introduction of the new 991-generation GT3, which is the first GT3 with electric power steering and no manual gearbox option, how does it stack up to the competition from McLaren and Nissan?
Evo's Jethro Bovingdon attempts to answer that question by pitting the rear-engine Porsche against the mid-engine McLaren MP4-12C on a racetrack and the front-engine, all-wheel-drive Nissan GT-R on some amazing, twisty European back roads. We won't give away the victor of either comparison, but we will say that, in Evo's test, the McLaren's 141-horsepower advantage doesn't give it as much of an edge over the Porsche on a racetrack as one might think, and the lack of a manual gearbox and the inclusion of electric power steering on the GT3 isn't detrimental to enjoying the car on a back road.
Watch the video below to find out which car Bovingdon prefers on road and track - we think you'll be happy to see him drift around turns every chance he gets.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.