Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2010 Nissan Sentra on 2040-cars

US $8,975.00
Year:2010 Mileage:114395 Color: Gray
Location:

7371 Dixie Hwy, Fairfield, Ohio, United States

7371 Dixie Hwy, Fairfield, Ohio, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:2.0L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic CVT
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3N1AB6AP0AL670281
Stock Num: 03138
Make: Nissan
Model: Sentra
Year: 2010
Exterior Color: Gray
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • Black grille w/chrome surround
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Door pockets: Driver and passenger
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Driver Seat Head Restraint Whiplash Protection
  • Engine immobilizer
  • Flip forward cushion/seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Head Room: 40.6"
  • Front Hip Room: 54.1"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 42.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 56.9"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 14.5 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 3,950 lbs.
  • Head Restraint Whiplash Protection with Passenger Seat
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventi
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Max cargo capacity: 13 cu.ft.
  • Metal-look center console trim
  • Metal-look dash trim
  • Metal-look shift knob trim
  • Overall height: 59.5"
  • Overall Width: 70.5"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear Head Room: 37.3"
  • Rear Hip Room: 53.0"
  • Rear Leg Room: 34.5"
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 55.1"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Semi-independent rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Speed-proportional electric power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Speed Rating: H
  • Tires: Width: 205 mm
  • Torsion beam rear suspension
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Width: 6.5
  • Wheelbase: 105.7"
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 114395

GREAT cars at GREAT Prices for GREAT People! Home of the LIFETIME Warranty. As long as you own your car it's under warranty!

Auto Services in Ohio

Wired Right ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Alarms & Security Systems, Automobile Accessories
Address: 22350 Lorain Rd, Strongsville
Phone: (440) 734-3838

Wheel Medic Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2971 Silver Dr, Groveport
Phone: (614) 299-9866

Wheatley Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2195 N Cleve-Mass Rd, Bath
Phone: (330) 659-2022

Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: Mount-Healthy
Phone: (800) 325-7564

Walton Hills Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations, Convenience Stores
Address: 17975 Alexander Rd, Shaker-Heights
Phone: (440) 232-9728

Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 649 Leona St, Amherst
Phone: (440) 324-7484

Auto blog

Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with

Mon, 12 May 2014

Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.

Pickup sales may hit 2M units for first time since 2007

Sat, 21 Sep 2013

Even as fuel prices creep back up, trucks are still a hot item among new-vehicle shoppers. To see how popular pickup trucks still are, you don't have to look any further than how much effort automakers put into the continual one-upmanship of their trucks. Backing this fact up, USA Today is reporting that the segment could top two million sales this year - a total not matched since 2007, though still far from the pre-recession, three-million-unit levels.
Through August, the Ford F-Series continues to be the segment leader with almost 500,000 units sold, but the Chevy Silverado (328,269), Ram 1500 (234,642), GMC Sierra (122,232) and Toyota Tacoma (110,293) are all seeing at least 20-percent sales increases, helping to account for around 1.44 million truck sales so far this year - not including possible outliers like the Suzuki Equator and Chevy Avalanche.
This year alone, General Motors has completely redesigned its fullsize trucks, Ram and Toyota have significantly updated their offerings, the next-gen Ford F-150 will be out next year and Nissan is promising an all-new Titan around the same time with an eventual Cummins diesel under the hood. It would seem, then, that truck sales are poised to continue their upward trend.

IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving

Tue, Oct 11 2022

WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.