Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Nissan Sentra 1.8 S on 2040-cars

US $8,700.00
Year:2006 Mileage:66656 Color: Pewter /
 Gray
Location:

17667 State Highway 13, Branson West, Missouri, United States

17667 State Highway 13, Branson West, Missouri, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:1.8L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3N1CB51DX6L563707
Stock Num: 8319
Make: Nissan
Model: Sentra 1.8 S
Year: 2006
Exterior Color: Pewter
Interior Color: Gray
Options:
  • 4 Door
  • Black grille
  • Body-colored bumpers
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Diameter of tires: 15.0"
  • Door pockets: Driver and passenger
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Fixed antenna
  • Front Head Room: 39.9"
  • Front Hip Room: 52.1"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.6"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 52.5"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 13.2 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 28 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 3,549 lbs.
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Max cargo capacity: 12 cu.ft.
  • Mechanical remote trunk release
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Non-independent rear suspension
  • Overall height: 55.5"
  • Overall Length: 177.5"
  • Overall Width: 67.3"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Plastic/vinyl steering wheel trim
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear bench
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Trunk
  • Rear Head Room: 37.0"
  • Rear Hip Room: 52.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 33.7"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 52.6"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Profile: 60
  • Tires: Speed Rating: H
  • Tires: Width: 195 mm
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV
  • Wheel Diameter: 15
  • Wheel Width: 6
  • Wheelbase: 99.8"
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 66656

Only 66000 Actual Miles, 1.8S Pkg, 4 Cyl, Automatic, Air, AM/FM/CD Player, Front Wheel Drive, Non Smoker, Excellent Fuel Mileage, Ready For Delivery!!!! Visit us at www.oakleyautoworld.com to see more information & pictures on the vehicle or call 866-316-6078 to set up an appointment to test drive!!! Remember to Like us on facebook... For more information and pictures please visit us at www.oakleyautoworld.com. Bring this ad in and recieve a full tank of gas with purchase of a vehicle. Must be present at time of purchse. No cash value.

Auto Services in Missouri

Westport Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 2171 W Port Plaza Dr, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 576-7339

Sterling Ave Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1841 E Main St, Warsaw
Phone: (660) 438-4599

Santa Fe Glass Co Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 1306 S Commercial St, Strasburg
Phone: (866) 449-9818

Osage Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 6215 Fire Station Rd, Osage-Beach
Phone: (573) 348-4073

North West Auto Body & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 12990 Saint Charles Rock Rd, Bridgeton
Phone: (314) 770-2700

Napa Auto Parts - Horn`S Auto Supply ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Engines-Supplies, Equipment & Parts, Truck Equipment & Parts
Address: 217 S 169 Hwy, Gower
Phone: (816) 424-6479

Auto blog

Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test

Tue, Oct 25 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video:

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

Jeremy Clarkson names 10 worst cars for 2015 and 2016

Wed, Aug 24 2016

When Jeremy Clarkson, outspoken automotive journalist, ex- Top Gear host, and co-host on The Grand Tour, drives a car he doesn't like he doesn't pull his punches. As Jezza harshly puts it, cars shouldn't just be a form of transportation. These 10 cars made Clarkson's "the terrible 10" list on his column in The Sunday Times for lacking imagination and not giving the journalist "the Fizz," which his list of top 10 cars did. In typical Clarkson fashion, the list is controversial. Some of the cars on Clarkson's list have received praise from other outlets, which shouldn't really come as a surprise since he usually goes against the majority's opinion. Nonetheless, there's at least one car that will catch you off guard. To get a glimpse at Clarkson's reviews and the entire list of cars, head over to his column in The Sunday Times. Vauxhall Astra SRi Nav Infiniti Q30 Premium Tech Skoda Superb SE L Executive Zenos E10 S Renault Kadjar Signature Nav BMW X1 xDRIVE25d SEAT Leon X-Perience SE Technology Nissan GT-R Track Edition Volkswagen Scirocco 2.0 TDi Hyundai i800 Related Video: Featured Gallery Jeremy Clarkson's Terrible 10 For 2015 and 2016 View 11 Photos News Source: The Sunday TimesImage Credit: Clive Brunskill / Getty Images Celebrities BMW Hyundai Infiniti Nissan Toyota Performance bmw x1 infiniti q30