Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2004 Nissan Sentra S Sedan 4-door 1.8l, One Owner, Good Condition, 146k Miles on 2040-cars

US $3,995.00
Year:2004 Mileage:146400
Location:

Paterson, New Jersey, United States

Paterson, New Jersey, United States

2004 Nissan Sentra 1.8S Manual
Reasonable offer will not be refused
146,400 Miles
One owner vehicle
New exhaust system (see picture)
New wheel bearing
All known issue with the vehicle has been fixed, car is ready for next owner
We welcome and encourage inspection and test drive prior to purchase
This case is EXCELLENT on GAS


Fuel Economy: City 24/ Hwy 32/Comb 27 MPG
Max Seating: 5
Doors: 4
Engine: 4-Cyl, 1.8 Liter
Drivetrain: FWD
Transmission: Manual, 5-Spd



Contact us if you have any questions:
Trusted Auto Sales
(973) 910-3138
You may contact us to view and test drive the vehicle
There are no hidden fees (NO DEALER FEES)

Warranty: The vehicle is being sold as is, with no warranty, expressed written or implied.   Any descriptions or representations are for identification purposes only and are not to be construed as a warranty of any type. It is the responsibility of the buyer to have thoroughly inspected the vehicle and to have themselves as to the condition and value and to bid based upon that judgment solely. We make reasonable effort to disclose any known defects associated with this vehicle at the buyer's request prior to the close of sale.

Bidding: Your bid constitutes a legally binding contract to purchase this vehicle. Please do not bid if you're not seriously interested or financially able to purchase this vehicle. Please read eBay's "User Agreement". If you do not pay for the item, you will be reported to eBay.

Buyer's Inspection: We try our best to disclose all information known about this vehicle for auction. I welcome and encourage buyers to inspect the vehicle prior to purchase. You may inspect the vehicle yourself or have a Buyer's Inspection, please make sure you have the vehicle inspected prior to the end of the auction. Inspection fees, if any, are the "Buyer's" sole responsibility.

Shipping and Delivery: All shipping charges are the "Buyer's" responsibility. We assume no responsibility for damages incurred after the vehicle leaves my home.

Payments: A deposit of $400 non-refundable by PayPal, or Cashier’s Check, or Cash must be paid within 48 hours of the close of the Auction.  The remaining balance must be paid within 5 days.

Taxes and Fees: "Buyer" is responsible for knowing their own states' laws regarding taxes and fees and also remitting the proper taxes, fees, and documents for their state. NJ buyers may pay the taxes to us.

Finalizing Your Purchase: Winning bidder must contact us within 24 hours of the end of the auction to make arrangements to complete the transaction.

Auto Services in New Jersey

Zambrand Auto Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 250 42nd St, Bloomfield
Phone: (718) 965-1903

W J Auto Top & Interiors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Seat Covers, Tops & Upholstery
Address: 2255 Wyandotte Rd Ste B, Pennsauken
Phone: (215) 659-5125

Vreeland Auto Body Co Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
Address: 330 Vreeland Ave, Haskell
Phone: (973) 684-1382

Used Tire Center ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 1070 Salem Rd, North-Plainfield
Phone: (908) 349-8027

Swartswood Service Station ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Gas Stations
Address: 902 Swartswood Rd, Tranquility
Phone: (973) 383-4345

Sunrise Motors ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile & Truck Brokers
Address: 430 Industrial Ave Ste 11P, Ridgefield
Phone: (201) 462-9000

Auto blog

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

NHTSA releases updated Takata airbag recalled cars list, but it still has errors

Wed, 22 Oct 2014



Unfortunately, the government's list still contains errors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has issued an updated list of vehicle models that it's urging owners to repair under the mushrooming Takata airbag inflator recall. The latest version adds vehicles from new automakers like Subaru and Ford that are missing from the original announcement, and it also removes erroneous entries from General Motors, leaving only the 2005 Saab 9-2X (a reskinned Subaru WRX), and the 2003-2005 Pontiac Vibe, a joint project with Toyota.

Nissan IDx Nismo and IDx Freeflow concepts are a bridge to the Datsun 510

Wed, 20 Nov 2013

We're not sure if someone from The Adjustment Bureau stopped by Nissan's PR department to explain the IDx Nismo and IDx Freeflow concepts, but the company's odd press release can't diminish our love for these two show favorites. We had been told to look out for an unnamed Datsun 510 BRE homage, and once we saw the brothers IDx, we knew we'd found them. But the press release doesn't mention anything about the Datsun 510 Brock Racing Enterprises, nor does it mention one Mr. Peter Brock, the man who won two Trans-Am championships in the Seventies for the nascent Japanese budget brand.
Instead, it declares that the cars were the result of a co-creation product development process with "digital natives," said natives being the whippersnappers born after 1990. Nissan says it worked with the young'uns to create two different expressions of "their desire for a basic, authentic configuration for a car." If that's true, it appears that what the kiddies really want are... two different homages to the Datsun 510 BRE that Peter Brock used to win two championships in the seventies for the nascent Japanese brand.
The IDx Freeflow - the "ID" is for "identification," the "x" is "the variable representing the new values and dreams born through communication" - takes the casual approach, with a light khaki exterior hue, a minimalist interior decked out in denim and a console shifter that works a continuously variable transmission. The IDx Nismo is out for blood, from its crimson interior to its five-point harness to its bolt-on flares and sidepipes. We aren't told what the digital natives requested for powerplants, but that's alright; if this is what "co-creation" looks like, we're not entirely against it except where that "CVT" is involved.