Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Nissan Pathfinder Sl on 2040-cars

US $36,980.00
Year:2014 Mileage:0 Color: Moonlight
Location:

1700 Siebarth Dr, Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

1700 Siebarth Dr, Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:3.5L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic CVT
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 5N1AR2MN0EC703255
Stock Num: 25293
Make: Nissan
Model: Pathfinder SL
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Moonlight
Options:
  • 1st
  • 2nd and 3rd row head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • 50-50 Third Row Seat
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Audio controls on steering wheel
  • Automatic front air conditioning
  • Black grille w/chrome surround
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Dual front air conditioning zones
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Four-wheel Independent Suspension
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Head Room: 42.2"
  • Front Leg Room: 42.3",
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 19.5 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 20 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 26 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 5,986 lbs.
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Independent rear suspension
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Manual Folding Third Row Seat
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 7.6 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 80 cu.ft.
  • MP3 player
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall height: 69.6"
  • Overall Length: 197.2"
  • Overall Width: 77.2"
  • Overhead console: Mini with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Deep
  • Rear air conditioning with separate controls
  • Rear Head Room: 39.4"
  • Rear heat ducts with separate controls
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear spoiler: Lip
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote power door locks
  • Remote window operation
  • Side airbag
  • Silver aluminum rims
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Trip computer
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Video Monitor Location: Front
  • Wheel Width: 7.5
  • Wheelbase: 114.2"
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors

We're Making Deals Everyday!

Auto Services in Louisiana

Yokem Toyota ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1199 E Bert Kouns, Benton
Phone: (318) 798-3773

Welch & Son Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 715 Little Farms Ave, Good-Hope
Phone: (504) 737-6900

Terry`s Truck & Diesel Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 2005 W Summers Dr, Abbeville
Phone: (337) 893-7569

Ryan`s Paint and Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 126 Verdin Ln, Thibodaux
Phone: (985) 448-3450

Ray Brandt Toyota ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 2460 Veterans Memorial Blvd, Montz
Phone: (504) 464-4500

Ragusa`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 2714 Government St, Port-Allen
Phone: (225) 234-0842

Auto blog

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd

IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving

Tue, Oct 11 2022

WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.

PickupTrucks.com's latest test results in a familiar winner [w/video]

Wed, 19 Jun 2013

PickupTrucks.com has gone and thrown the latest batch of half-ton pickups into a cage match to see who would come out on top. The site put the 2014 Chevrolet Silverado 1500, GMC Sierra 1500, 2013 Ford F-150, Ram 1500, Toyota Tundra and Nissan Titan through a battery of tests. Those included 0-60 miles per hour acceleration, 60-0 mph deceleration, fuel economy, a hill climb, and payload and towing. They even threw the rigs on an autocross course to evaluate overall handling. Each truck was given points based on how it scored in each evaluation.
Who came out on top? Somewhat surprisingly, the 2013 Ford F-150 walked away with the gold, though fewer than 50 points separated first and fourth place. Head over to PickupTrucks.com to read the full evaluation and the final results. You may be shocked to see exactly where some of the segment's newest additions placed. You can also watch a video on the test below.