Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Nissan Frontier Sl on 2040-cars

US $21,285.00
Year:2011 Mileage:64589 Color: Silver /
 Steel
Location:

27758 US-19, Clearwater, Florida, United States

27758 US-19, Clearwater, Florida, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:4.0L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1N6AD0ER5BC428919
Stock Num: NT428919
Make: Nissan
Model: Frontier SL
Year: 2011
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Steel
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Bucket front seats
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front and rear
  • Door pockets: Driver
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Driver Seat Head Restraint Whiplash Protection
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front Head Room: 40.0"
  • Front Hip Room: 55.6"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 42.4"
  • Front Shoulder Room: 58.3"
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 21.1 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 20 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Head Restraint Whiplash Protection with Passenger Seat
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Manual front air conditioning
  • Metal-look dash trim
  • Overall Width: 72.8"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • passenger and rear
  • Privacy glass: Deep
  • Rear center seatbelt: 3-point belt
  • Rear door type: Tailgate
  • Rear Head Room: 38.7"
  • Rear Hip Room: 58.0"
  • Rear Leg Room: 33.6"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 58.3"
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Conventional
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Seatbelt pretensioners: Front
  • Side airbag
  • SiriusXM Satellite Radio
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Tires: Prefix: P
  • Tires: Speed Rating: T
  • Tires: Width: 265 mm
  • Two 12V DC power outlets
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 64589

Auto Services in Florida

Zip Auto Glass Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 4103 S Orlando Dr, Debary
Phone: (877) 659-0818

World Of Auto Tinting Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 1608 NW 20th St, Biscayne-Park
Phone: (305) 324-0753

Wilson Bimmer Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1701 Ridgewood Ave, Allandale
Phone: (386) 673-2269

Willy`s Paint And Body Shop Of Miami Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 9493 NW 12th St, Village-Of-Palmetto-Bay
Phone: (305) 471-9881

William Wade Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 2708 NE Waldo Rd, Melrose
Phone: (352) 226-8688

Wheel Innovations & Wheel Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Wheels, Hub Caps
Address: 5920 University Blvd W, Green-Cove-Springs
Phone: (904) 731-0867

Auto blog

This map reveals the cleanest vehicles based on location

Thu, Apr 28 2016

Naysayers love to point out how dirty the electricity grid mix is when it comes to charging electric vehicles. Curmudgeons are eager to jump into any conversation about EVs to enlighten the lucky listeners about how plug-in cars contribute to pollution, sometimes even throwing in a dash of climate-change denial for good measure. (Thanks, buddy. Pray, tell me more about the plight of oppressed SUV owners.) Unless someone buys an EV just because they think they're cool (which, yeah, they often are), they probably have at least a passable understanding of their environmental pros and cons. As many EV owners are already aware, location has a lot to do with any particular plug-in car's carbon footprint. Still, there's always more to know, and knowledge is not a bad thing, especially if one uses it to do the right thing. That's why this handy-dandy map from Carnegie Mellon University is so interesting. CMU researchers have compiled information about the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of various EVs based on where they're charged, as compared to gasoline-powered vehicles. The researchers looked at the Nissan Leaf, Chevrolet Volt, and Prius Plug-In Hybrid versus the gasoline-dependent Toyota Prius hybrid and the stop-start-equipped Mazda3 with i-ELOOP and compared grams of CO2 emitted per mile. CMU takes into account the grid mix, ambient temperature, and driving patterns. CMU takes into account the grid mix based on county, as well as ambient temperature and driving patterns in terms of miles traveled on the highway or in the city. For instance, if you drive a Nissan Leaf in urban areas of California, Texas, or Florida, your carbon footprint is lower than it would be if you were driving a standard Toyota Prius. However, if you charge your Leaf in the Midwest or the South, for the most part, you've got a larger carbon footprint than the Prius. If you live in the rural Midwest, you'd probably even be better off driving a Mazda3. Throughout the country, the Chevrolet Volt has a larger carbon footprint than the Toyota Prius, but a smaller one than the Mazda3 in a lot of urban counties in the US. The Prius and Prius Plug-In are relatively equal across the US. Having trouble keeping it straight? That's not surprising. The comparisons between plug-in and gasoline vehicles are much more nuanced than the loudest voices usually let on.

Tesla about to sell 50,000th Model S

Wed, Oct 22 2014

Nissan sold its 50,000th Leaf a total of two years and two months after introducing the EV to dealerships. Tesla isn't as established as Nissan, and its Model S - with its higher levels of luxury and performance - costs multiple times more than the Leaf. Consider the Tesla's starting price of $70,000-plus (and easily much more with a bigger battery and a few upgrades), and compare that to the Leaf's base MSRP of just a bit over $30,000 before its 2013 price cut. It would make sense, then, that it would take the Model S longer to hit 50,000 unit sales. But, no. The Model S could meet the 50,000 sales milestone before the end of October (in fact, it may already have done so). This is just two years and three months after it launched in late June 2012. The Model S could meet the 50,000 sales milestone before the end of October. Tesla hasn't released its sales report for the third quarter, but the Palo Alto-based automaker sold 39,128 units of the Model S through June. Previously, Tesla estimated it would have 7,800 third quarter sales (putting it at 46,928 through September), other independent estimates put Tesla at 50,000 sales in late October. The Model S may not have beat the Nissan Leaf to 50K, but it's not hard to see how this is a win for the California automaker. Arguably, this is a case where we all win. Anytime some buys an EV instead of a traditionally powered vehicle - regardless of marque - that's less energy consumed while driving, fewer emissions and an example set to others who have yet to make the switch. It's hard not to be impressed by Tesla's relative success. Furthermore, Tesla coming so close to Nissan in selling 50,000 EVs is, above all, a testament to the desirability of the Model S, despite the Leaf's clear advantage in terms of attainability.

Strains between France and Italy risk Renault-FCA merger

Thu, May 30 2019

PARIS/ROME — Fiat Chrysler's proposed $35 billion merger with Renault has cheered investors, won conditional support from Paris and Rome and even earned cautious backing from trade unions. Beneath this veneer, however, the bold attempt to create the world's third-largest carmaker risks becoming rapidly embroiled in the fraught relationship between France's europhile President Emmanuel Macron and Italy's euroskeptic leaders. For while Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini hailed the proposal as a "brilliant operation," Italy's creaking, state-subsidized Fiat factories are likely to bear the brunt of any production-related cost savings. FCA and Renault said this week that more than 5 billion euros ($5.6 billion) of annual savings would come mainly from combining platforms, consolidating powertrain and electrification investments and the benefits of increased scale. Salvini and France's Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire, who called the deal a "good opportunity" to build a European industrial champion able to compete with China and the United States, have both said they want guarantees on local jobs. "It's not every day that I agree with Salvini," said Le Maire, whose government appears to hold the trump cards. When it comes to where any job cuts fall, France will be helped by its existing 15 percent holding in Renault, whose superior efficiency at its five French plants makes it better placed to handle a supply glut, the demise of the petrol engine and the investments needed for electric and autonomous vehicles. "It will take many, many years to find real savings, and ugly political and operational realities can often swamp the potential of such new entities," Bernstein analyst Max Warburton said of the FCA-Renault plan to rival Japan's Toyota and Germany's Volkswagen. Advantage France? As well as Italy's government having to cope with the aftermath of European elections, which coincided with news of the FCA-Renault plans, political leaders in Rome were only informed shortly before the deal was made public, an FCA source said. This contrasted with the way the French government was treated, with Fiat Chrysler Chairman John Elkann, a fluent French speaker, letting it know of his merger proposal to Renault weeks ago, a French government official said.