Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2011 Nissan Frontier Crew Cab 4x4 Roof Rack Alloy Wheels I Pod Leather Fosgate on 2040-cars

US $27,588.00
Year:2011 Mileage:24496 Color: Black /
 Gray
Location:

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:4.0L DOHC 24-valve V6 engine
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: 1N6AD0EV4BC445370 Year: 2011
Make: Nissan
Model: Frontier
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Crew Cab
Mileage: 24,496
Sub Model: SL
Exterior Color: Black
Number of Doors: 4
Interior Color: Gray
Drivetrain: 4 Wheel Drive
Number of Cylinders: 6
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Nissan Frontier for Sale

Auto Services in Arkansas

Tint Pro & Accessories ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Window Tinting
Address: 2900 Towson Ave, Bonanza
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Tim`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 17 Fayetteville St, Van-Buren
Phone: (479) 474-2100

Swain`s Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3214 Bernice Ave, Dardanelle
Phone: (479) 968-4931

Seeburg Muffler & Brake ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 2880 W Walnut St, Tontitown
Phone: (479) 636-6900

Seeburg Muffler & Brake ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 1599 N College Ave, Prairie-Grove
Phone: (479) 442-4242

River City Motors II ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 3030 Thomas St, Marion
Phone: (901) 358-9000

Auto blog

Should heavy-duty pickup trucks have window stickers with fuel mileage estimates?

Sat, Sep 23 2017

If you were to stroll into your nearest Chevrolet, Ford, GMC, Nissan, or Ram dealership, you'd find a bunch of pickup trucks. Most of those would have proper window stickers labeled with things like base prices, options prices, location of manufacture, and, crucially, fuel economy estimates. But you'd also run across a number of heavy-duty trucks with no such fuel mileage data from the Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA doesn't require automakers to publish the valuable miles-per-gallon measurement for vehicles with gross weight ratings that exceed 8,500 pounds. That makes it difficult for consumers to compare behemoths powered by turbocharged diesel engines – between one another, and between smaller, gasoline-fueled trucks. Consumer Reports doesn't think it should be this way, and it's spearheading an effort (PDF link) to get the government to require manufacturers to publish fuel economy estimates. In its own testing, CR found that heavy-duty pickups powered by Ford's Power Stroke, GM's Duramax, and FCA's Cummins diesel engines (which doesn't include the Ram's EcoDiesel) get worse fuel mileage than their lighter-duty gas-powered siblings. We're not so sure HD-truck buyers are unaware of this fact – big diesels don't really come into their own until big loads are placed in their beds or attached to their trailer hitches. Under heavy workloads, the diesel trucks will almost certainly return greater efficiency than a similar gas-powered truck. What's more, HD trucks with lumbering diesels in general make the driver feel more confident while towing due to greater torque at low engine RPM than gas trucks. They also offer greater max-weight limits. Still, we agree EPA fuel mileage estimates should be offered for heavy-duty pickups. And we think the comparisons provided by Consumer Reports might be interesting to potential buyers. Click here to see the results of CR's tests, and let us know what you think using the poll below. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Consumer Reports Government/Legal Green Read This Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan RAM Fuel Efficiency Truck Commercial Vehicles Diesel Vehicles poll gmc sierra hd chevy silverado hd

Nissan Rogue redesigned with three rows for 2014

Tue, 10 Sep 2013

Nissan has been on a roll lately, redesigning its core model line with all-new versions of the Altima, Pathfinder, Sentra and Versa Note released this year. But the Japanese automaker wouldn't leave out the Rogue, its second-best-selling model in the US.
Like the Range Rover Sport, Mitsubishi Outlander and Ford Explorer, the second-generation Nissan Rogue has gained an optional third row of seats for seven-passenger capability. Along with the middle and rear rows, the front passenger seat can also be folded flat for the benefit of cargo capacity, and the cabin has been redesigned for an airier look and feel.
Despite the added space inside, the new Rogue is only marginally larger than the model it replaces, with a 0.6-inch longer wheelbase offset by shorter overhangs front and rear. A lower drag coefficient ought to help reduce wind noise and improve fuel consumption as well.

Roller coaster or racecar, which pulls more Gs?

Tue, 15 Jul 2014

Looking for a thrill? You're not the only one. You'll find kindred spirits at airfields going up for a skydive, atop bridges and towers with bungees attached to their feet and standing in line for roller coasters at the local amusement park. But you'll also find them in the paddock at the racing circuit.
So what's the commonality? G-force. It's like gravity, only in each of these cases, it's experienced by human invention. But which activity subjects your body to the greatest amount of g-force? That's what Nissan set to find out.
Before putting them back in the cockpit, Nismo sent out two of its young hot-shoes - Jann Mardenborough and Mark Shulzhitskiy - to an amusement park in the UK with a camera and a g-force meter to find out if any of the coasters could produce as much lateral gravitational force as an LMP2 racing car. See what they found in the pair of videos, below.