Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1992 300zx Base Coupe With A V8 350 Chevy Engine on 2040-cars

US $7,500.00
Year:1992 Mileage:143000 Color: Silver /
 Gray
Location:

Berthoud, Colorado, United States

Berthoud, Colorado, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:2 dr coupe T tops
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:chevy 350 v8
Fuel Type:gas
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: jn1rz24h9nx520028 Year: 1992
Make: Nissan
Model: 300ZX
Trim: basr 2 dr coupe
Options: CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: rear wheel drive
Power Options: Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Mileage: 143,000
Sub Model: Z32
Exterior Color: Silver
Disability Equipped: Ac is disabled
Interior Color: Gray
A z32 z car with a v8 its fast: 1992
Number of Cylinders: 8
300ZX: 7500.00
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Up for sale due to health a 1992 300zx 2 dr coupe with T tops and converted to a chevy  built  rattical cam,350 engine 4 barrel carb 350 turbo transmission, B&M shifter, custom headers, and exhaust, cloth seats nice custom stereo with nice upper end speakers, every thing works , eccept the Ac , has the power steeering rack and the hood still closes with the v8 in there.

magnaflow mufflers.,all custom done by certified tech of 35 years, started as  just as shop a project and has been a blast to do

but hard times and health force the issue to sell it now.

The tachometer and speedometer need to be calibrated but do work.

all new suspension new struts, trailing adjustabe arms, neoprine,

new oil pan and harmonic balancer, neoprine motor mounts, electric fans to many parts and time in this car to list them all.

email to ask more ?s.

the only thing left to do to this car is fix a small hole in frvers seat, program and calibrate the speedo, and tach,

and paint the drivers door someone scratched it pretty deep see pics or paint complete car, has  no rust very nice  straight body.

 

 

Auto Services in Colorado

Tim`s Paintless Dent Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 462 Laredo St, Aurora
Phone: (303) 872-7918

Three G Body & Paint Incorporated ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 8136 W Brandon Dr, Greenwood-Village
Phone: (303) 470-0000

Sun Valley Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 899 S Kipling Pkwy, Indian-Hills
Phone: (303) 986-5214

Sanitaire Parts & Service ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 5995 E Evans Ave, Centennial
Phone: (303) 872-7918

Sabaru Import Motors Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 320 S 14th St, Fountain
Phone: (719) 632-5807

Rickenbaugh Cadillac-Volvo ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 777 Broadway, Aurora
Phone: (303) 573-7773

Auto blog

NHTSA, IIHS, and 20 automakers to make auto braking standard by 2022

Thu, Mar 17 2016

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and virtually every automaker in the US domestic market have announced a pact to make automatic emergency braking standard by 2022. Here's the full rundown of companies involved: BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru, Tesla, Toyota, Volkswagen, and Volvo (not to mention the brands that fall under each automaker's respective umbrella). Like we reported yesterday, AEB will be as ubiquitous in the future as traction and stability control are today. But the thing to note here is that this is not a governmental mandate. It's truly an agreement between automakers and the government, a fact that NHTSA claims will lead to widespread adoption three years sooner than a formal rule. That fact in itself should prevent up to 28,000 crashes and 12,000 injuries. The agreement will come into effect in two waves. For the majority of vehicles on the road – those with gross vehicle weights below 8,500 pounds – AEB will need to be standard equipment by September 1, 2022. Vehicles between 8,501 and 10,000 pounds will have an extra three years to offer AEB. "It's an exciting time for vehicle safety. By proactively making emergency braking systems standard equipment on their vehicles, these 20 automakers will help prevent thousands of crashes and save lives," said Secretary of Transportation Anthony Foxx said in an official statement. "It's a win for safety and a win for consumers." Read on for the official press release from NHTSA. Related Video: U.S. DOT and IIHS announce historic commitment of 20 automakers to make automatic emergency braking standard on new vehicles McLEAN, Va. – The U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety announced today a historic commitment by 20 automakers representing more than 99 percent of the U.S. auto market to make automatic emergency braking a standard feature on virtually all new cars no later than NHTSA's 2022 reporting year, which begins Sept 1, 2022. Automakers making the commitment are Audi, BMW, FCA US LLC, Ford, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Kia, Maserati, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi Motors, Nissan, Porsche, Subaru, Tesla Motors Inc., Toyota, Volkswagen and Volvo Car USA.

DC fast charging not as damaging to EV batteries as expected

Mon, Mar 17 2014

As convenient as DC fast charging is, there have been lots of warnings that repeated dumping of so many electrons into an electric vehicle's battery pack in such a short time would reduce the battery's life. While everyone agrees that DC fast charging does have some effect on battery life, it may not be as bad as previously expected. Over on SimanaitisSays, Dennis Simanaitis, writes about a recent presentation by Matt Shirk of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) called DC Fast, Wireless, And Conductive Charging Evaluation Projects (PDF) that describes an ongoing test of four 2012 Nissan Leaf EVs that are being charged in two pairs of two. One pair only recharges from 50-kW DC fast chargers, which the other two sip from 3.3-kW Level 2 chargers exclusively. Otherwise, the cars are operated pretty much the same: climate is automatically set to 72 degrees, are driven on public roads around Phoenix, AZ and have the same set of dedicated drivers is rotated through the four cars. "Degradation depends more on the miles traveled than on the nature of recharging." What's most interesting are the charts on page seven of Shirk's presentation (click the image above to enlarge), which show the energy capacity of each of the four vehicles. When they were new, the four batteries were each tested to measure their energy capacity and given a 0 capacity loss baseline. They were then tested at 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 and 40,000 miles, and at each point, the DC-only EVs had roughly the same amount of battery loss as the Level 2 test subjects. The DC cars did lose a bit more at each test, but only around a 25-percent overall loss after 40k, compared to 23 percent for the Level 2 cars. Simanaitis' takeaway is that, "INL data suggest that the amount of degradation depends more on the miles traveled than on the nature of recharging." The tests are part of the INLs' Advanced Vehicle Testing Activity work and a final report is forthcoming. These initial numbers from IPL do mesh with other research into DC fast charging, though. Mitsubishi said daily fast charging wouldn't really hurt the battery in the i-MiEV and MIT tests of a Fisker Karma battery showed just 10-percent loss over 1,500 rapid charge-discharge cycles.

Nissan won't downsize the next Armada

Wed, 28 Aug 2013

The Nissan Armada is aptly named, because in relative automotive terms, it's not just the size of a ship - it's the size of a whole fleet. And that, according to reports, isn't about to change.
While many of the larger SUVs on the market are gradually being phased out or replaced by smaller crossovers, Nissan apparently plans on keeping the Armada right where it is. And that means a large, truck-based, eight-passenger colossus, because there are buyers out there who expect no less and Nissan isn't about to lose them to the likes of the Toyota Sequoia, Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator, or a General Motors lineup that includes the Chevy Suburban and Tahoe, GMC Yukon and Cadillac Escalade.
That doesn't mean that the next Armada - which Edmunds expects will arrive in 2015 or 2016 - will be immune to constricting environmental regulations, so Nissan will have to get creative. A vehicle the size of the Armada has all the aerodynamic efficiency of the side of a barn, but Nissan is reportedly aiming to streamline that in order to boost efficiency, for starters.