1986 Nissan 300zx 2+2 on 2040-cars
Grasonville, Maryland, United States
You are looking at my 1986 Nissan 300zx 2+2 that I picked up locally around 4 years ago with 97,000 miles on it. At the time the car ran fine but needed a clutch, most of the interior was apart or missing pieces. I took my time looking thru Ebay and finding all missing pieces, I replaced all rear bushings, springs and shocks to get the cars ride height right. I fixed the fuel gauge, all the dash light bulbs, After I put the car to together I took it thru Maryland inspection where it passed with flying colors. I cleaned it up and parked it in my garage for the next 4 years and drove it less than 12 times a year for a total of around 4000 miles. The car is a great driver and only needs a few more things to make it perfect. I bought a lot of things that still need to be installed and they go with the car including all new bushings for the front, new struts, new stainless exhaust. and lost of small parts. The car has a slight oil leak on the valve cover. It has a 1 small spot of minor rust in the left rear quarter panel. The car always starts up and drives straight down the road. Feel free to ask any questions. |
Nissan 300ZX for Sale
- 1987 nissan 300zx 3.0l 5-speed t-tops original 70k miles **rare** ...no reserve!
- Spectacular state of the art 365hp stillen smz custom - sharp - fast- immaculate(US $22,900.00)
- 1986 white nissan 300zx two door hatchback with digital interface
- Blue nissan 300zx coupe
- 1991 nissan 300zx twin turbo coupe - california car(US $5,500.00)
- 1996 nissan 300zx 1 owner slicktop 5speed manual super low 46k miles rare sporty(US $15,950.00)
Auto Services in Maryland
Tyre`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Sterling Glass ★★★★★
R & A Auto Body ★★★★★
Potomac Auto Body ★★★★★
Meineke Car Care Center ★★★★★
John`s Rv & Trailer Ctr ★★★★★
Auto blog
Porsche 911 GT3 dukes it out with MP4-12C on track and GT-R on spectacular roads
Thu, 22 Aug 2013The Porsche 911 GT3 has always been a favorite among auto journalists and car enthusiasts alike, but with the introduction of the new 991-generation GT3, which is the first GT3 with electric power steering and no manual gearbox option, how does it stack up to the competition from McLaren and Nissan?
Evo's Jethro Bovingdon attempts to answer that question by pitting the rear-engine Porsche against the mid-engine McLaren MP4-12C on a racetrack and the front-engine, all-wheel-drive Nissan GT-R on some amazing, twisty European back roads. We won't give away the victor of either comparison, but we will say that, in Evo's test, the McLaren's 141-horsepower advantage doesn't give it as much of an edge over the Porsche on a racetrack as one might think, and the lack of a manual gearbox and the inclusion of electric power steering on the GT3 isn't detrimental to enjoying the car on a back road.
Watch the video below to find out which car Bovingdon prefers on road and track - we think you'll be happy to see him drift around turns every chance he gets.
2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo to hit 60 mph in 2 seconds?
Wed, 31 Jul 2013Here's your daily dose of incredulity - AutoExpress is reporting the 2015 Nissan GT-R Nismo will hit 60 miles per hour in two seconds. Okay. The report comes from an unnamed source that AE spoke with at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, and would mean that the GT-R Nismo, a car that will likely sit below $150,000, will be able to outsprint (over short distances) a 1200-horsepower, $2.58-million Bugatti Veyron Super Sport.
Citing a more potent version of the GT-R's twin-turbocharged V-6 along with a healthy drop in weight, AutoExpress says that the performance is the result of the same group that helped develop the Juke Nismo, Williams Advanced Engineering. An unnamed engineer for Williams (it's not made clear if this is the same source from Goodwood) notes that there are improvements to be had "even with a car like the GT-R."
As exciting as the GT-R Nismo is going to be, we're having a hard time accepting that it will be able to hit 60 in two seconds flat, at least on street tires. What do you think? Have your say in Comments.
Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test
Tue, Oct 25 2016The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video: