Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Mercury Grand Marquis Ls on 2040-cars

US $9,993.00
Year:2008 Mileage:67229 Color: Light Ice Blue Metallic /
 Medium Light Stone
Location:

3800 S East St, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

3800 S East St, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:E-85/Gasoline
Engine:4.6L V8 16V MPFI SOHC Flexible Fuel
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 2MEFM75V78X605561
Stock Num: T4204
Make: Mercury
Model: Grand Marquis LS
Year: 2008
Exterior Color: Light Ice Blue Metallic
Interior Color: Medium Light Stone
Options:
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Automatic front air conditioning
  • Braking Assist
  • Cargo area light
  • Chrome grille
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Compass
  • Cornering Lights
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Curb weight: 4,118 lbs.
  • digital keypad power door locks
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Electrochromatic rearview mirror
  • External temperature display
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front split-bench
  • Front suspension stabilizer bar
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 19.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 15 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 23 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Flexible
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • Heated driver mirror
  • Heated passenger mirror
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Leather seat upholstery
  • Leather steering wheel trim
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 8.4 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 21 cu.ft.
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall height: 56.3"
  • Overall Length: 212.0"
  • Overall Width: 78.3"
  • Overhead console: Full
  • Painted aluminum rims
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power Adjustable Pedals
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear bench
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Simulated wood dash trim
  • Simulated wood door trim
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Trip computer
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 7
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 67229

LS trim. Very Nice, GREAT MILES 67,229! PRICE DROP FROM $10,777, PRICED TO MOVE $1,000 below NADA Retail! Leather Interior, CD Player, Flex Fuel Capability, Aluminum Wheels, JDPower.com - 5 Power Circle Rated. AND MORE!======KEY FEATURES INCLUDE: Leather Seats, Flex Fuel Capability, CD Player. Aluminum Wheels, Keyless Entry, Remote Trunk Release, Child Safety Locks, Heated Mirrors. LS with Light Ice Blue Metallic exterior and Medium Light Stone interior features a 8 Cylinder Engine with 224 HP at 4800 RPM*. Non-Smoker vehicle, New tires installed. ======EXPERTS REPORT: Edmunds.com's review says Hiproom and shoulder room are particularly impressive.. 5 Star Driver Front Crash Rating. 5 Star Driver Side Crash Rating. JDPower.com Power Circle Ratings - Predicted Reliability - 5 Power Circles, Overall Initial Quality Study - 4.5 Power Circles (www.jdpower.com) ======A GREAT TIME TO BUY: Reduced from $10, 777. This Grand Marquis is priced $1, 000 below NADA Retail. ======WHO WE ARE: After more than 50 years in business, The Hubler Auto Group, through the power of ten central Indiana locations, has literally sold hundreds of thousands of vehicles and is one of the oldest and most prolific auto dealers in the State employing 550 people. The Hubler Auto Group can claim the title for selling more G.M. vehicles in the State of Indiana than any other dealer or dealer group, and has earned the right to brag of having the largest and most loyal customer Pricing analysis performed on 5/16/2014. Horsepower calculations based on trim engine configuration. Please confirm the accuracy of the included equipment by calling us prior to purchase.

Auto Services in Indiana

Westfalls Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 1729 E 650 N, West-Lafayette
Phone: (765) 463-4968

Trinity Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 2402 E Washington St, Indianapolis
Phone: (317) 631-2777

Tri-County Collision Center & Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing
Address: 903 State Road 46 W, New-Point
Phone: (812) 934-4629

Tom O`Brien Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram-In ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 4630 E 96th St, Westfield
Phone: (317) 805-4400

TJ`s Auto Salvage ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Junk Dealers
Address: Indianapolis
Phone: (317) 450-2777

Tire Central and Service Southern Plaza ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 437 E Hanna Ave, Indianapolis
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Auto blog

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.

Ford finds flex-fuel engine design plays big role in emissions output

Mon, Jan 6 2014

How bad is ethanol for your engine? There's been a lot of debate on this issue as the US considers upping the biofuel content in the national gasoline supply from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The ethanol industry and some scientists say higher ethanol blends show no "meaningful differences" in new engines while the oil industry says ethanol creates health risks. Researchers working at the Ford Research and Innovation Center decided to take a closer look at how a wide range of gas-ethanol blends - E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E55 and E80 - affected the emissions coming out of a flex-fuel 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. To see the full report, printed in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, requires payment, but there is an abstract and Green Car Congress has some more details. The gist is that, "with increasing ethanol content in the fuel, the tailpipe emissions of ethanol, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methane, and ammonia increased." At least NOx and NMHC emissions decreased. The researchers say that the effects are due to the fuel and "are expected for all FFVs," but that the way that a manufacturer calibrates the engine will affect NOx, THC, and NMOG emissions. It's this last bit that's important, since the researchers found, "Higher ethanol content in gasoline affects several fundamental fuel properties that can impact emissions. ... These changes can have positive or negative effects that can depend on engine design, hardware, and control strategy. In addition to direct emissions impacts, higher ethanol content fuel can also provide more efficient combustion and overall engine operation under part-load conditions and under knock-limited higher-load conditions." So, as we head towards more ethanol in our fuel supply (maybe), manufacturers are going to need to learn how to burn it most efficiently.

NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

Sat, Aug 15 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.