Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Mercury Sable Ls Premium on 2040-cars

US $5,500.00
Year:2002 Mileage:135215 Color: French Blue Clearcoat Metallic /
 Medium Graphite
Location:

235 W. Mitchell Ave., Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

235 W. Mitchell Ave., Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:3.0L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1MEFM55SX2A634482
Stock Num: P2133
Make: Mercury
Model: Sable LS Premium
Year: 2002
Exterior Color: French Blue Clearcoat Metallic
Interior Color: Medium Graphite
Options:
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Anti-theft alarm system
  • Automatic front air conditioning
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Cassette player with auto-reverse
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Chrome grille
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Cloth seat upholstery
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Compass
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Curb weight: 3,313 lbs.
  • digital keypad power door locks
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Electrochromatic rearview mirror
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Four-wheel Independent Suspension
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 18.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 18 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 27 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • Heated driver mirror
  • Heated passenger mirror
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Independent rear suspension
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Leather steering wheel trim
  • Machined aluminum rims
  • Max cargo capacity: 16 cu.ft.
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall
  • Overall Length: 199.8"
  • Overall Width: 73.0"
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Plastic/rubber shift knob trim
  • Power Adjustable Pedals
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear bench
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Simulated wood center console trim
  • Simulated wood dash trim
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside under cargo
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Strut front suspension
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV
  • Wheel Diameter: 16
  • Wheel Width: 6
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 135215

All Cars.Com customers who purchase a new or used vehicle from Woody Sander Ford will receive a preferred customer card good for 5 free oil changes and a complimentary service loaner.

Auto Services in Ohio

West Chester Autobody Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 9366 Cincinnati Columbus Rd, Trenton
Phone: (513) 777-3857

West Chester Autobody ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Windshield Repair
Address: 9366 Cincinnati Columbus Rd, Goshen
Phone: (513) 268-0219

USA Tire & Auto Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: 1501 E Dorothy Ln, Springboro
Phone: (937) 310-5354

Trans-Master Transmissions ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 725 N Main St, Dayton
Phone: (937) 746-5620

Tom & Jerry Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1701 Kenny Rd, Amlin
Phone: (614) 488-8507

Tint Works, LLC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Customizing, Automobile Detailing
Address: 189 W Olentangy St Suite C, Richwood
Phone: (614) 649-5878

Auto blog

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.

Ringbrothers shows off Coyote-powered 1968 Mercury Cougar

Thu, Feb 25 2021

We'll openly admit that not every SEMA build is our cup of tea. But this? A tastefully resto-modded 1968 Mercury Cougar with a 460-horsepower Ford Mustang V8? Yeah, this is right in our wheelhouse. Sadly, there was no in-pwerson SEMA show in 2020, so we missed out on gems like this one. SEMA or no SEMA, the aftermarket carries on, and co-owners Jim and Mike Ring of Ringbrothers (get it?) saw no reason to let their time and effort go to waste.  When they're not building wild customs (see: 1,100-horsepower 1972 AMC Javelin AMX) or more subtle showcases (such as this Cougar or their 1971 K5 Chevy Blazer build from 2018), the folks at Ringbrothers crank out factory reproduction parts, whether for old-fashioned restoration or modification purposes. While '60s muscle cars are recurring build subjects for the two, the Cougar was the first of its kind they tackled.  Keeping it in the family, Ringbrothers sourced a Ford 5.0-liter "Coyote" V8 and a 10-Speed Automatic (lifted from an F-150 Raptor, incidentally) for the build. They didn't stop with the driveline, of course. The suspension was overhauled with a little help from DSE and a set of HRE Series C1 C103 Forged 3-Piece wheels were thrown over upgraded brakes.  "We put our heart into each car we build, and this Cougar is no exception," Jim said. "The finished product is mild and classy, yet any enthusiast instantly knows it's not stock. I imagine this is what Mercury designers would have come up with if they were building the Cougar today." "While we couldn't bring the car to the SEMA Show, we hope it can be shown to the public soon," Mike said. "We had never done a Cougar before, so this was a fun build. I love working with new shapes and coming up with new ideas." There's plenty to appreciate about this Cougar apart from the mechanicals, too. The finish is Augusta Green Metallic (courtesy of BASF), which was a factory color in 1968. You may know it by another name: Highland Green. There are a few custom exterior touches, but they're quite subtle and styled to be period-correct. The interior was also restored and updated, and it's where you'll find the only thing we're not fond of: that big, fat truck shifter. Gearbox choices notwithstanding, it's a bit of an eyesore. But considering how gorgeous the rest is, we'll give it a pass.  Related Video:

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.