Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2010 Mercury Grand Marquis Ls on 2040-cars

US $13,900.00
Year:2010 Mileage:17916 Color: Light Blue /
 Light Camel
Location:

400 N 20th St, Ozark, Missouri, United States

400 N 20th St, Ozark, Missouri, United States
Fuel Type:E-85/Gasoline
Engine:4.6L V8 16V MPFI SOHC Flexible Fuel
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 2MEBM7FV0AX624259
Stock Num: 4212P
Make: Mercury
Model: Grand Marquis LS
Year: 2010
Exterior Color: Light Blue
Interior Color: Light Camel
Options:
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • AM/FM stereo
  • Automatic front air conditioning
  • Braking Assist
  • Cargo area light
  • Chrome grille
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cornering Lights
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Curb weight: 4,118 lbs.
  • digital keypad power door locks
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • Dusk sensing headlights
  • Electrochromatic rearview mirror
  • External temperature display
  • Front and rear reading lights
  • Front Head Room: 39.5"
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front Leg Room: 41.6"
  • Front Shoulder
  • Front split-bench
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 19.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 16 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 24 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Flexible
  • Headlights off auto delay
  • Heated driver mirror
  • Heated passenger mirror
  • In-Dash single CD player
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Leather seat upholstery
  • Leather steering wheel trim
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 8.3 s
  • Max cargo capacity: 21 cu.ft.
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall height: 56.3"
  • Overall Length: 212.0"
  • Overall Width: 78.3"
  • Painted aluminum rims
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power remote trunk release
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Light
  • Rear bench
  • Rear Head Room: 37.8"
  • Rear Leg Room: 38.0"
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Short and long arm front suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Simulated wood dash trim
  • Simulated wood door trim
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Inside
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Steel spare wheel rim
  • Suspension class: Regular
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Total Number of Speakers: 4
  • Trip computer
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: ULEV II
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 7
  • Wheelbase: 114.6"
Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 17916

VERY LOW MILEAGE! VERY CLEAN! Visit Campbell Ford & Mercury Inc. online at www.campbellfordrv.com to see more pictures of this vehicle or call us at 877-236-1639 today to schedule your test drive. "Family owned and operated since 1945"

Auto Services in Missouri

Xpert Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2818 Forest Ridge Ln, Westphalia
Phone: (573) 638-2666

Wrench Teach GV ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 315 S Main St, Grain-Valley
Phone: (816) 847-7117

Twin City Toyota ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 301 Autumn Ridge Dr, Mapaville
Phone: (636) 931-0555

Trux Unlimited Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 1015 S Bethany St, Sugar-Creek
Phone: (816) 463-9907

The Tint Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting, Glass Coating & Tinting
Address: 53 Norwood Trailer Ct, Washington
Phone: (636) 390-8828

The Automotive Shop of Melbourne ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1152 E Main St, Jefferson-Cty
Phone: (870) 368-3133

Auto blog

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.

NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"

Ford recalling 450,000 Fusion, Mercury Milan sedans

Tue, Nov 24 2015

Ford has announced a pair of recalls, and both are critical safety issues. The exponentially larger of the two recall campaigns affects over 450,000 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan sedans manufactured at the Hermosillo plant between July 21, 2008, and March 4, 2011. The canister purge valve in the fuel tank could malfunction and could cause the top of the tank to crack and leak fuel. That could cause a fire, although Ford "is not aware of any accidents, injuries or fires" resulting from the issue. Affected vehicles will have their ECU software updated and their fuel tanks inspected for potential replacement. The company estimates there are 411,205 affected units in the United States (and its federalized territories), plus another 33,605 in Canada, and 7,055 in Mexico. The second recall affects 13 F-650 trucks. The column shifter's park position mechanism may fracture and let the truck roll away unexpectedly. Those 2016 models built in Ohio between July 29 and September 3, 2015 are all located in the US. Fixing the problem will require replacing the steering column and reconfiguring the instrument panel. FORD ISSUES TWO SAFETY RECALLS IN NORTH AMERICA DEARBORN, Mich., Nov. 23, 2015 – Ford Motor Company is issuing two safety recalls in North America. Ford is not aware of any accidents, injuries or fires related to these conditions. Details are as follows: Ford issues safety recall for certain 2010-2011 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles in North America for potential fuel tank issue Ford Motor Company is issuing a safety recall for approximately 450,000 2010-2011 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles for a potential issue with the fuel tank. Some of these vehicles might have a canister purge valve that does not work properly, causing internal pressure changes inside the fuel tank. Repeated pressure changes inside the tank could result in a crack on the top of the tank, possibly allowing fuel to leak. A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source can lead to a fire. Ford is not aware of any accidents, injuries or fires related to this condition. Affected vehicles include certain 2010-2011 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant from July 21, 2008 through March 4, 2011. There are a total of approximately 451,865 vehicles that might be affected in North America, including 411,205 vehicles in the United States and federalized territories, 33,605 in Canada and 7,055 in Mexico.