Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2000 Mercury Cougar Base Coupe 2-door 2.5l on 2040-cars

Year:2000 Mileage:119364 Color: Gray /
 Gray
Location:

Rolla, Missouri, United States

Rolla, Missouri, United States
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.5L 2450CC 155Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 1ZWFT61L2Y5623818 Year: 2000
Make: Mercury
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Cougar
Trim: V6 Coupe 2-Door
Options: CD Player
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Windows
Drive Type: FWD
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Doors: 2
Number of Cylinders: 6
Mileage: 119,364
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"This car was left at my house approximately 3 yrs ago by the girlfriend of one of my sons. She left it and we were unable to contact her. Recently I received a valid, original title of my own, with me as the owner. I have not run it at all for these 3 yrs. It has simply set there under my carport. This weekend I put a new battery in it. It started right up. The oil seems good. I have run it for approximately 60 min while I washed it. The tires are obviously bad from dry rot. Local dealer quoted about $320 for 4 of them. They are P205/60R15 tires. The brake discs are rusted from setting this long time. Probably need to be turned. When I drove it to have some repairs done on it while the girlfriend was still here, the front end was really wiggley. Have never seen anything quite like that. Thought maybe it was alignment problem. Mechanic told me it was just really bad tires. I don't know. Odometer says 119,364 miles. Don't believe AC is working. Radio not working."

Auto Services in Missouri

Wise Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1302 Erie St, Pleasant-Valley
Phone: (816) 474-3825

Wicke Auto Service & Body Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 453 N Newstead Ave, Breckenridge-Hills
Phone: (314) 533-0339

Vincel Infiniti ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 3500 E Sunshine St, Fair-Grove
Phone: (901) 745-9600

Union Tires & Wheels ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 2348 Central Ave, Independence
Phone: (913) 342-3599

Truck Centers Inc ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, New Truck Dealers
Address: 747 E Taylor Ave, Breckenridge-Hills
Phone: (314) 381-3800

Tri -Star Imports ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 16360 Truman Rd, Crescent
Phone: (636) 489-2532

Auto blog

NHTSA advances investigation of Ford Crown Victoria headlights

Sat, Aug 15 2015

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is opening a preliminary evaluation into reports of suddenly failing headlights on 517,945 examples of the 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis. The government started looking into this problem in April when the North Carolina Consumers Council filed a defect petition with the agency. Now, the inquiry has moved to the next step. According to NHTSA's documentation (as a PDF), it examined its own database and worked with Ford to come up with a total of 3,609 complaints of the front lighting control module suddenly failing. When this happens, drivers lose the low-beam headlights, but the high-beams can be used by holding the stalk. Sometimes turning the switch off and on fixes the issue. Additionally, there are 15 allegations of crashes, and one reported shoulder injury. NHTSA's preliminary evaluations "evaluate the scope, frequency, and consequence of the alleged defect" and don't necessarily lead to a recall. NHTSA looked into this problem once before in 2008 and 2009 and decided that a recall wasn't necessary. Ford also extended the warranty on the front lighting control module for these vehicles. INVESTIGATION Subject : Loss of headlights Date Investigation Opened: AUG 10, 2015 Date Investigation Closed: Open NHTSA Action Number: PE15028 Component(s): EXTERIOR LIGHTING All Products Associated with this Investigation Vehicle Make Model Model Year(s) FORD CROWN VICTORIA 2003-2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS 2003-2005 Details Manufacturer: Ford Motor Company SUMMARY: After receiving a defect petition (DP15002) concerning the loss of headlights and other exterior lighting in model year (MY) 2003-2005 Ford Crown Victoria and Mercury Grand Marquis vehicles, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) analyzed Vehicle Owner Questionnaire (VOQ) complaints received from consumers and identified a total of 605 reports (for all submission dates) alleging headlight failure. The complaints indicate failures of both low beam headlights typically while driving, a defect condition that was evaluated under a prior ODI investigation (PE08066). Most consumer VOQs indicate that the headlights failed suddenly and without warning leaving the driver with no forward lighting, however some report the headlights flickered or dimmed prior to turning off. In some cases drivers were able to turn the headlights back on after a period of time while others reported the headlights would not come back on at all.

Ford recalls Five Hundred, Mercury Montego sedans over fuel tank woes

Mon, 18 Jul 2011

Ford has announced through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it is recalling nearly 3,000 examples of its Five Hundred and Mercury Montego (pictured) sedans from the 2007 model year.
The action, which affects 2,945 vehicles, is due to potentially defective welds between the filler neck and the fuel tank, a condition that could result in a fuel leak or the smell of gasoline reaching the occupants. In the worst-case scenario, a leak could cause a fire. Cars with the affected fuel tank problem could see an illuminated dashboard warning light as a result of the evaporative emissions leak being detected.
Ford will inspect and replace the fuel tank at no cost to owners (those who have already had the procedure done at-cost can apply for reimbursement), and the Dearborn automaker will begin notifying Five Hundred and Montego owners beginning August 15. Check out the official NHTSA press release after the jump for further details.

Junkyard Gem: 1971 Mercury Comet 2-Door Sedan

Sat, Sep 10 2022

When Ford introduced the original Maverick for the 1970 model year, Dearborn tradition required that a Mercury-badged version be created. That car ended up being the Comet, built from the 1971 through 1977 model years. Here's one of those first-year Comets in rough but recognizable condition, found in a Denver self-service yard not long ago. The Comet name had spent the 1960s affixed to the flanks of Mercurized Ford Falcons (1960-1965) and Fairlanes (1966-1969). Since the Maverick was the successor of the Falcon — sales of which went into an irrecoverable downward spiral once its sportier Mustang first cousin hit the streets — it made sense to move the Comet name over to the Mercury version. Nearly every American Mercury model ever sold was a U.S.-market Ford model with a different name and some gingerbread slapped on. Notable exceptions to this tradition include the 1999-2002 Mercury Cougar (mechanically based on the Contour but with a unique body) and the 1991-1994 Mercury Capri (an Australian-built mashup of Mazda components borrowed from the Ford Laser). The Comet was by far the cheapest Mercury model available in 1971, though it was considered more prestigious than its Maverick counterpart. The price tag on the '71 Comet two-door sedan started at $2,217 (about $16,505 in 2022 dollars), while the '71 Maverick two-door sedan cost $2,175 ($16,193 today). Meanwhile, AMC would sell you a new Hornet two-door sedan for one dollar less than a Maverick, Chevrolet had the Nova coupe for a dollar more than the Maverick, and Plymouth offered the Valiant Duster for $2,313 ($17,220 now). Toyota had a Maverick competitor as well that year, with the Corona at $2,150 for the sedan and $2,310 for the coupe. Having driven every one of the aforementioned models, I'd take the Duster if I went back in time and had to choose one (as a 1969 Corona owner, I'm not a fan of the 1971 facelift, though the Corona's build quality beats the Duster's). The build sticker on this car tells us that it was built at the Kansas City Assembly Plant (where Transits and F-150s are made today) and sold through the Los Angeles district sales office (there was a DSO in Denver, so it's a near-certainty that this car didn't start out in Colorado). The paint started out as Bright Blue Metallic (it's neither bright nor metallic 51 years down the road) and the interior was done up in Medium Blue Cloth & Vinyl.