1967 Mercury Cougar on 2040-cars
La Grange, Kentucky, United States
Engine:302
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Private Seller
Exterior Color: Maroon
Make: Mercury
Interior Color: Black
Model: Cougar
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: N/a
Drive Type: C4 Automatic
Mileage: 0
67 cougar. 302 with a small cam aluminum intake , Holley carb. New headers with new dual exhaust. C4 trams. Has all new floor pans , strut towers , new front suspension, control arms, ball joints bushings, sway bar links. New paint, dash pad , seats have been recovered, new vinyl top, new magnum wheels, car runs and drives great. When all body work was done any rust was cut out and new metal welded in. Have pics of threw out the restoration. E mail with any questions and for more photos. Very nice car
Mercury Cougar for Sale
- 1969 mercury cougar xr-7 5.8l convertible(US $22,500.00)
- 1976 mercury cougar xr-7 hardtop 2-door 5.8l(US $8,000.00)
- 347 ci stroker, tremec 5-speed, 4:10 w/trac-lok, power steering, front disc, a/c(US $22,995.00)
- 1972 mercury cougar xr7
- 1967 mercury cougar low reserve! no rust, runs/drives great, 97k original miles!
Auto Services in Kentucky
Wathen`s Service Center ★★★★★
Tri-State Auto Outlet ★★★★★
Tire Discounters ★★★★★
Tim Frye`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Taylor County Muffler Shop ★★★★★
South Broadway Collision Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford announces bevy of recalls, 2 of which are recalls on recalls
Tue, 04 Nov 2014
Ford has announced five separate recalls, affecting 202,000 vehicles built between 2005 and 2014.
It's not been a great couple of weeks for Ford. On October 30, the company announced a 205,000-unit recall, and yesterday, it was revealed that the Ford brand's year-over-year sales were down over 5,000 units while the company itself was down 3,000 units over through October. Now, the company has announced five separate recalls affecting 202,000 vehicles built between 2005 and 2014.
Ford finds flex-fuel engine design plays big role in emissions output
Mon, Jan 6 2014How bad is ethanol for your engine? There's been a lot of debate on this issue as the US considers upping the biofuel content in the national gasoline supply from 10 percent (E10) to 15 percent (E15). The ethanol industry and some scientists say higher ethanol blends show no "meaningful differences" in new engines while the oil industry says ethanol creates health risks. Researchers working at the Ford Research and Innovation Center decided to take a closer look at how a wide range of gas-ethanol blends - E0, E10, E20, E30, E40, E55 and E80 - affected the emissions coming out of a flex-fuel 2006 Mercury Grand Marquis. To see the full report, printed in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, requires payment, but there is an abstract and Green Car Congress has some more details. The gist is that, "with increasing ethanol content in the fuel, the tailpipe emissions of ethanol, acetaldehyde, formaldehyde, methane, and ammonia increased." At least NOx and NMHC emissions decreased. The researchers say that the effects are due to the fuel and "are expected for all FFVs," but that the way that a manufacturer calibrates the engine will affect NOx, THC, and NMOG emissions. It's this last bit that's important, since the researchers found, "Higher ethanol content in gasoline affects several fundamental fuel properties that can impact emissions. ... These changes can have positive or negative effects that can depend on engine design, hardware, and control strategy. In addition to direct emissions impacts, higher ethanol content fuel can also provide more efficient combustion and overall engine operation under part-load conditions and under knock-limited higher-load conditions." So, as we head towards more ethanol in our fuel supply (maybe), manufacturers are going to need to learn how to burn it most efficiently.
Ford recalls Five Hundred, Mercury Montego sedans over fuel tank woes
Mon, 18 Jul 2011Ford has announced through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration that it is recalling nearly 3,000 examples of its Five Hundred and Mercury Montego (pictured) sedans from the 2007 model year.
The action, which affects 2,945 vehicles, is due to potentially defective welds between the filler neck and the fuel tank, a condition that could result in a fuel leak or the smell of gasoline reaching the occupants. In the worst-case scenario, a leak could cause a fire. Cars with the affected fuel tank problem could see an illuminated dashboard warning light as a result of the evaporative emissions leak being detected.
Ford will inspect and replace the fuel tank at no cost to owners (those who have already had the procedure done at-cost can apply for reimbursement), and the Dearborn automaker will begin notifying Five Hundred and Montego owners beginning August 15. Check out the official NHTSA press release after the jump for further details.