Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1967 Cougar Xr7 Original 129k Actual Miles on 2040-cars

US $9,000.00
Year:1967 Mileage:129 Color: cinnamon frost /
 Tan
Location:

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Wichita, Kansas, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:289
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Condition:

Used

Make
: Mercury
Exterior Color: cinnamon frost
Model: Cougar
Interior Color: Tan
Year: 1967
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: cougar xr7
Drive Type: automatic c4
Mileage: 129
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Sub Model: XR7

I have a beautiful original 1967 Cougar XR7 for sale. Here is the story: Was with grandma, the 4th documented owner, for the past 7 years. Car was in the garage and rarely driven. With grandmas house sale the Cougar lost its home. The Xr7 has 129k actual miles. I have driven the car 200 miles over the past 2 days, runs drives as it should. Gauges, tach, sequential tail lights, blower motor, wipers, it all works. The air blows, but not cold, the headlight doors open but do not shut unless you do it manually. The car was fun to drive and plenty of thumbs up when I was behind the wheel. The car is an unrestored original. The underside is very good, solid, trunk has the houndstooth mat with the cardboard still there. The car looks good, with a ding and donk here and there, but very presentable. The car has a 289 with a Dan Gurney chrome dress up kit, C 4 trans and dual exhaust. The Cougar starts right up and drives straight and solid. The brakes are non power drums, so they stop the car like non power drum brakes do. This is a really nice original classic. I took a great number of pictures so you can judge yourself. I am selling at no reserve with a very fair starting price. A 500 dollar deposit is due at 48 hours after auctions end. Any and all questions will be answered quickly. The car is sold as is where is how is. It is as I have said. I will supply any potential buyers a contact number, so you will be happy with WHAT YOU BID ON, WHAT YOU WIN.  Goal is to keep everybody HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY! BID BABY BID!!!! GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS!!!

Auto Services in Kansas

X-Treme Automotive L.L.C. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 424 N Washington St, Eastborough
Phone: (316) 265-6245

Vilela Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Windshield Repair
Address: 103 S Elm St, Carona
Phone: (620) 231-6350

Salazar Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 917 Herald St, Pierceville
Phone: (620) 275-2104

Roe Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4715 Roe Pkwy, Westwood
Phone: (913) 722-2545

Rich Industries Auto Parts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 4120 Winchester Ave, Tonganoxie
Phone: (816) 482-3672

Ray`s Muffler & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 4602 NW Gateway Ave, Mission
Phone: (816) 587-9101

Auto blog

Ford finally issues recall for 230K minivans over rust problems

Sun, 10 Mar 2013

The rust issue in the rear wheel wells of 2004-2007 Ford Freestar and Mercury Monterey minivans has finally led to a recall. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration began an investigation into the matter in 2011, said investigation being upgraded to an engineering analysis a year later while NHTSA tried to figure out how many model years should be included in the assessment.
Ford has decided to recall all of the 230,000 minivans potentially affected, namely those sold in salt-belt states and countries like Canada. The excess rust in the rear wheel wells was also able to prevent the third-row seats from locking to the floor of the minivan. To repair the problem, owners can take their minivans to dealers, and the dealers will place new panels in the wheel wells, replace the third-row seat mounting brackets and relocate the latches to an area away from any corrosion.
Ford says it will begin notifying owners during the last week of March.

Junkyard Gem: 1971 Mercury Comet 2-Door Sedan

Sat, Sep 10 2022

When Ford introduced the original Maverick for the 1970 model year, Dearborn tradition required that a Mercury-badged version be created. That car ended up being the Comet, built from the 1971 through 1977 model years. Here's one of those first-year Comets in rough but recognizable condition, found in a Denver self-service yard not long ago. The Comet name had spent the 1960s affixed to the flanks of Mercurized Ford Falcons (1960-1965) and Fairlanes (1966-1969). Since the Maverick was the successor of the Falcon — sales of which went into an irrecoverable downward spiral once its sportier Mustang first cousin hit the streets — it made sense to move the Comet name over to the Mercury version. Nearly every American Mercury model ever sold was a U.S.-market Ford model with a different name and some gingerbread slapped on. Notable exceptions to this tradition include the 1999-2002 Mercury Cougar (mechanically based on the Contour but with a unique body) and the 1991-1994 Mercury Capri (an Australian-built mashup of Mazda components borrowed from the Ford Laser). The Comet was by far the cheapest Mercury model available in 1971, though it was considered more prestigious than its Maverick counterpart. The price tag on the '71 Comet two-door sedan started at $2,217 (about $16,505 in 2022 dollars), while the '71 Maverick two-door sedan cost $2,175 ($16,193 today). Meanwhile, AMC would sell you a new Hornet two-door sedan for one dollar less than a Maverick, Chevrolet had the Nova coupe for a dollar more than the Maverick, and Plymouth offered the Valiant Duster for $2,313 ($17,220 now). Toyota had a Maverick competitor as well that year, with the Corona at $2,150 for the sedan and $2,310 for the coupe. Having driven every one of the aforementioned models, I'd take the Duster if I went back in time and had to choose one (as a 1969 Corona owner, I'm not a fan of the 1971 facelift, though the Corona's build quality beats the Duster's). The build sticker on this car tells us that it was built at the Kansas City Assembly Plant (where Transits and F-150s are made today) and sold through the Los Angeles district sales office (there was a DSO in Denver, so it's a near-certainty that this car didn't start out in Colorado). The paint started out as Bright Blue Metallic (it's neither bright nor metallic 51 years down the road) and the interior was done up in Medium Blue Cloth & Vinyl.

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.