Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1974 Mercury Comet Original Survivor Grandmothers Car on 2040-cars

US $7,495.00
Year:1974 Mileage:36033
Location:

Newtown, Connecticut, United States

Newtown, Connecticut, United States

  • 1974 MERCURY COMET THIS CAR IS A SURVIVOR! LOOKING AT IT I WOULD SAY ITS 98% ORIGINAL PAINT, BODY, ORIGINAL STYLE INTERIOR YOU COULD EAT OFF OF. 
  • THIS LITTLE OLD LADY CAR HAS BEEN GARAGED ALL ITS LIFE.
  • THIS CAR HAS A TOTAL OF ONLY 36,033 MILES ON IT, NOT WELL I THINK IT FLIPPED BUT I REBUILT IT OVER ( ITS FOR REAL)
  • CAR RUNS PERFECT YOU CAN DRIVE IT ANYWHERE WE RECENTLY TOOK IT ON A TWO HOUR TRIP WITH NO PROBLEMS.
  • THE CAR GETS LOOKS EVERYWHERE WE GO 
  • THE BABY BLUE COLOR IS AWESOME YOU WILL LOVE IT
  • DETAILED ENGINE COMPARTMENT LOOKS NEW 
  • THERE ARE SMALL SPOTS OF SURFACE RUST DOWN LOW FROM SITTING
  • A COUPLE OF DOOR DINGS,  THEY COULD BE POPPED OUT BY DENT WIZARD
  • THERE WERE THREE OWNERS A OLDER LADY, A MIDDLE AGE MAN AND THEN ME I'AM A ADULT ALSO
  • THERE IS ONE AD ON A CHERRY BOMB MUFFLER BY OWNER TWO, IT SOUNDS OK NOT LOUD
  • THE KIDS AND I HATE TO SELL IT ( BIG FIGHT OVER IT), ITS SO MUCH FUN. BUT I BOUGHT A RED 1957 CHEVY AND I LOVE IT ALSO SO ONE MUST GO. 
  • MIKE AT (203) 395-6732

Auto Services in Connecticut

Warburtons Automobile Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 913 Main St, Oneco
Phone: (401) 828-6574

Vail Buick GMC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 606 Bedford Rd, Ridgefield
Phone: (914) 666-7537

Saf-T Auto Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Gas Stations
Address: 986 S Main St, Cheshire
Phone: (203) 271-0899

Ren Sales & Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 98 Linwood Ave, North-Grosvenordale
Phone: (508) 234-9651

Pop`s Exhaust ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 53 Slater St, Coventry
Phone: (860) 645-6095

Paul`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 804 Stanley St, New-Britain
Phone: (860) 223-3324

Auto blog

Ford announces free brake pad offer if customers stop by dealers

Mon, 04 Aug 2014

These days, when you buy a new car, it's not unreasonable to expect a certain period of free maintenance to come along as well. Sometimes this is through the life of the warranty, in other cases a little less. But Ford Motor Company is going beyond those deals for at least one part of its cars. As of now, if you buy a set of Motorcraft brake pads for a Ford, Lincoln or Mercury model, you get free replacements for as long as you own the vehicle. The offer is good at Ford or Lincoln dealers and Quick Lane Tire & Auto Centers.
"We will replace the pads for as long as you own the vehicle," said Elizabeth Weigandt to Autoblog. She did clarify that the Motorcraft pads are generally for models from the '90s or newer. Also, to take advantage of this program, a person must return to the same dealer each time to get the free parts.
Of course, Ford isn't just handing out brake pads to anyone who walks by; there are certain stipulations. First, the components have to be worn down to less than three millimeters to be eligible, and the buyer still has to pay for the labor to install them. If the model is used as a fleet vehicle for commercial purposes like as a taxi or limousine, this offer also doesn't apply; the same thing for racecars. On the plus side, if you recently bought a set of pads from one of the participating locations, you're still in luck. The deal covers parts purchased as of July 1.

Impala SS vs. Marauder: Recalling Detroit’s muscle sedans 

Thu, Apr 30 2020

Impala SS vs. Marauder — it was comparo that only really happened in theory. ChevyÂ’s muscle sedan ran from 1994-96, while MercuryÂ’s answer arrived in 2003 and only lasted until 2004. TheyÂ’re linked inextricably, as there were few options for powerful American sedans during that milquetoast period for enthusiasts. The debate was reignited recently among Autoblog editors when a pristine 1996 Chevy Impala SS with just 2,173 miles on the odometer hit the market on Bring a Trailer. Most of the staff favored the Impala for its sinister looks and said that it lived up to its billing as a legit muscle car. Nearly two-thirds of you agree. We ran an unscientific Twitter poll that generated 851 votes, 63.9 percent of which backed the Impala. Muscle sedans, take your pick: — Greg Migliore (@GregMigliore) April 14, 2020 Then and now enthusiasts felt the Impala was a more complete execution with guts. The Marauder, despite coming along later, felt more hacked together, according to prevailing sentiments. Why? On purpose and on paper theyÂ’re similar. The ImpalaÂ’s 5.7-liter LT1 V8 making 260 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque was impressive for a two-ton sedan in the mid-Â’90s. The Marauder was actually more powerful — its 4.6-liter V8 was rated at 302 hp and 318 lb-ft. The ImpalaÂ’s engine was also used in the C4 Corvette. The MarauderÂ’s mill was shared with the Mustang Mach 1. You can see why they resonated so deeply with Boomers longing for a bygone era and also captured the attention of coming-of-age Gen Xers. Car and DriverÂ’s staff gave the Marauder a lukewarm review back in ‘03, citing its solid handling and features, yet knocking the sedan for being slow off the line. In a Hemmings article appropriately called “Autopsy” from 2004, the ImpalaÂ’s stronger low-end torque and smooth shifting transmission earned praise, separating it from the more sluggish Mercury. All of this was captured in the carsÂ’ acceleration times, highlighting metrically the differences in their character. The Impala hit 60 miles per hour in 6.5 seconds, while the Marauder was a half-second slower, according to C/D testing. Other sites have them closer together, which reinforces the premise it really was the little things that separated these muscle cars. Both made the most of their genetics, riding on ancient platforms (FordÂ’s Panther and General MotorsÂ’ B-body) that preceded these cars by decades. Both had iconic names.

NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"